Abstract
The existing literature highlights that Denmark’s Arctic policy is driven by Denmark’s wish to maintain good relationships with the United States and Greenland. This chapter examines if this is the case. It argues that while the relationship to Washington and Nuuk are arguably the most important driving forces behind Denmark’s Arctic policy, other factors, such as the institutional set-up in the Arctic, have also shaped Danish policy. The chapter also shows that the United States has recently become more interested in Greenland, as it has come to see the Arctic as an arena for geopolitical competition with other great powers. This creates new challenges for Denmark’s Arctic policy that differs from the situation during the Cold War, because of Greenland’s enhanced autonomy and the creation of new regional institutions in the past decades.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Danish Institute for International Affairs 1997: 407–21, quote is on p. 409, our translation, JRC & LJN.
References
Ackren, M., & Jakobsen, U. (2015). Greenland as a self-governing sub-national territory in international relations: past, current and future perspectives. Polar Record, 51(4), 404–412.
Anderson, E. (2019). Danish PM: Trump’s Interest in Buying Greenland is ‘Absurd’. https://www.politico.eu/article/danish-pm-trumps-interest-in-buying-greenland-is-absurd/.
Archer, C. (2003). Greenland, US bases and missile defence: New two-level negotiations? Cooperation and Conflict, 38(2), 125–147.
Associated Press. (2019). Greenland leader again rejects Trump’s buying idea. https://www.businessinsider.com/greenland-leader-again-rejects-trump-buying-idea-2019-8?r=US&IR=T.
Berbrick, W. A., & Pincus, R. (2018, October 24). Gray zones in a blue Arctic: Grappling with China’s growing influence. https://warontherocks.com/2018/10/gray-zones-in-a-blue-arctic-grappling-with-chinas-growing-influence/.
Berry, D. A. (2012). Cryolite, the Canadian aluminum industry and the American occupation of Greenland during the Second World War. The Polar Journal, 2(2), 219–235.
Beukel, E., Jensen, F. P., & Rytter, J. E. (2010). Phasing out the colonial status of greenland, 1945–54. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Breum, M. (2018, June 30). How a dispute over China and Greenland’s airports worked its way toward a solution. https://www.arctictoday.com/dispute-china-greenlands-airports-worked-way-toward-solution/?wallit_nosession=1.
Christensen, S. A., & Kristensen, K. S. (2009). Greenlanders displaced by the Cold War: Relocation and compensation. In B. Schaefer & M. Berg (Eds.), Historical justice in international perspective: How societies are trying to right the wrongs of the past (pp. 111–131). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Danish Defence Intelligence Service. (2018). Intelligence risk assessment 2018. An assessment of developments abroad impacting on Danish security. Copenhagen: Danish Defence Intelligence Service.
Danish Institute for International Affairs. (1997). Grønland under den Kolde Krig, Dansk og Amerikansk Sikkerhedspolitik 1945–68. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.
Defense of Greenland. (1941). https://www.loc.gov/law/help/us-treaties/bevans/b-dk-ust000007-0107.pdf.
Department of Defense. (2019). Department of defense Arctic strategy. Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
Department of Defense. (2016). Report to congress on strategy to protect United States national security interests in the Arctic region. Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
Douglas, N. C. (2015). The Arctic council: Governance within the far north. Abingdon: Routledge.
Economic Council of Greenland. (2016). Greenland economy 2016. Nuuk: The Economic Council.
English, J. (2013). Ice and water: Politics, peoples, and the Arctic council. Toronto: Allen Lane.
Gad, F. (1967). Grønlands historie: 1700–1782. Bind 1–2. Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag.
Gad, U. P. (2017). National identity politics and postcolonial sovereignty games: Greenland, Denmark, and the European Union. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanums Forlag.
Greenland’s Self-Government Act. (2009). http://www.stm.dk/_p_13090.html.
Greenlandic-Danish Self-Goverment Commission. (2008). Grønlandsk-dansk selvstyrekommissions betænkning om selvstyre i Grønland. Nuuk: Greenlandic-Danish Self-Goverment Commission.
Hamre, J. J., & Conley, H. A. (2017). The centrality of the north Atlantic to NATO and US strategic interests. In J. A. Olsen (Ed.), NATO and the north Atlantic (pp. 43–58). London: RUSI.
Heinrich, J. (2012). Eske Brun og det moderne Grønlands Tilblivelse 1932–64. Copenhagen: Atuagkat.
Heinrich, J. (2017). Independence through international affairs: How foreign relations shaped Greenlandic identity before 1979. In K. S. Kristensen & J. Rahbek-Clemmensen (Eds.), Greenland and the international politics of a changing Arctic—Postcolonial paradiplomacy between high and low politics. Abingdon: Routledge.
Henriksen, A., & Rahbek-Clemmensen, J. (2017). The Greenland card: prospects for and challenges to Danish Arctic diplomacy in Washington. In Danish foreign policy yearbook, 2017. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.
Jacobsen, M., (2016). Denmark’s strategic interests in the Arctic: It’s the Greenlandic connection, stupid! The Arctic Institute. http://www.thearcticinstitute.org/denmarks-strategic-interests-in-the-arctic-its-the-greenlandic-connection-stupid/. Accessed March 24, 2017.
Juel, K., Engholm, G., & Storm, H. (2005). Registerundersøgelse af dødelighed og kræftforekomst blandt thulearbejdere. Copenhagen: Ministry for the Interior and Health.
Keskitalo, C. (2004). Negotiating the Arctic: The construction of an international region. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kongstad, J., & Maressa, J. E. (2019, December 4). Grønlandsk vrede over, at Mette Frederiksen mødes alene med Trump. https://jyllands-posten.dk/indland/ECE11800181/groenlandsk-vrede-over-at-mette-frederiksen-moedes-alene-med-trump/.
Kristensen, K. S. (2005). Negotiating base rights for Missile Defence—The case of Thule air base in Greenland. In B. Heurlin & S. Rynning (Eds.), Missile Defence—International, regional and national implications, (pp. 183–207). Abingdon: Routledge.
Kristensen, K. S. & Rahbek-Clemmensen, J. (2018). Introduction: Greenland and the international Politics changing Arctic: Postcolonial paradiplomacy between high and low Politics. In K. S. Kristensen & J. Rahbek-Clemmensen (Eds.), Greenland and the international politics of a changing Arctic—Postcolonial paradiplomacy between high and low Politics. Abingdon: Routledge.
Lidegaard, B. (1996). I Kongens Navn: Henrik Kaufmann i dansk diplomati 1919–1958. Copenhagen: Samleren.
Mouritzen, H. (2007). Denmark’s super Atlanticism. Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 5(2), 155–167.
Mouritzen, K. (2019, October 22). Trump har sendt Pompeos “bulldog” til Grønland—og det er eksplosivt. https://www.berlingske.dk/globalt/trump-har-sendt-pompeos-bulldog-til-groenland-og-det-er-eksplosivt.
Mouritzen, K. & Kruse, S. (2019, October 26). Nu stiller politikerne skarpt på Grønland: Jeg er bekymret for, at USA kommer aggressivt ind i det grønlandske samfund. https://www.berlingske.dk/globalt/nu-stiller-politikerne-skarpt-pa-gronland-jeg-er-bekymret-for-at-usa.
Nielsen, J. S. (2016, August 10). Camp Century—en iskold gyser om fortidens synder. https://www.information.dk/indland/2016/08/camp-century-iskold-gyser-fortidens-synder.
Nielsen, H., & Nielsen, K. H. (2016). Camp century—Cold War city under the ice. In R. E. Doel, K. C. Harper, & M. Heymann (Eds.), Exploring Greenland: Cold War science and technology on ice, (pp. 195–216). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nikolaj, P. (2009). The Arctic as a new arena for Danish foreign policy: The Ilulissat initiative and its implications. In N. Hvidt & H. Mouritzen (Eds.), Danish foreign policy yearbook 2009 (pp. 35–78). Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.
Petersen, N. (2008). Arktis: Den nye dimension i dansk sikkerhedspolitik. Oekonomi Og Politik, 81(4), 3–25.
Petersen, N. (2011). SAC at Thule: Greenland in US polar strategy. Journal of Cold War Studies, 13(2), 90–115.
Petersen, N. (2013). The politics of US military research in Greenland in the early Cold War. Centaurus, 55(3), 294–318.
Pompeo, M. R. (2019, May 6). Looking north: Sharpening America’s Arctic focus. https://www.state.gov/looking-north-sharpening-americas-arctic-focus/.
Rahbek-Clemmensen, J. (2014). “Arctic-vism” in practice: The challenges facing Denmark’s political-military strategy in the high North. Arctic Yearbook, 2014, 399–414.
Rahbek-Clemmensen, J. (2017). The Arctic turn—How did the high North become a foreign and security policy priority for Denmark? In K. S. Kristensen & J. Rahbek-Clemmensen (Eds.), Greenland and the international politics of a changing Arctic—Postcolonial paradiplomacy between high and low Politics, Abongdon: Routledge.
Rahbek-Clemmensen, R. & Thomasen, G. (2018). Learning from the ilulissat initiative. State power, institutional legitimacy, and governance in the Arctic Ocean 2007–18. Centre for Military Studies. University of Copenhagen.
Rahbek-Clemmensen, J. (2019, August 28). Let’s (not) make a deal: Geopolitics and Greenland. https://warontherocks.com/2019/08/lets-not-make-a-deal-geopolitics-and-greenland/.
Rahbek-Clemmensen, J. (2020). Denmark and Greenland’s Changing sovereignty and security challenges in the Arctic. In G. H. Gjørv, M. Lanteigne, & H. Sam-Aggrey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Arctic security (2019). Abingdon: Routledge (forthcoming).
Rahbek-Clemmensen, J. (forthcoming). Arctic by Proxy: How Denmark’s bilateral relationship to Greenland shapes Its Arctic policy. In A. D. Nuttall & M. Nuttall (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Arctic politics, Abingdon: Routledge (forthcoming).
Ringsmose, J. (2008). Frihedens assurancepræmie: Danmark, NATO og forsvarsbudgetterne. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Ringsmose, J., & Rynning, S. (2008). The impeccable ally? Denmark, NATO, and the uncertain future of top tier membership. Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook, 2008, 55–84.
Rodman, L. L. (2019, September 25). Iceberg dead ahead. deconstructing the pentagon’s Arctic strategies. https://warontherocks.com/2019/09/iceberg-dead-ahead-deconstructing-the-pentagons-arctic-strategies/.
Rud, S. (2017). Colonialism in Greenland. Tradition, governance and legacy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Salama, V., Ballhaus, R., Restuccia, A., & Bender, M. C. (2019, August 16). President Trump eyes a new real-estate purchase: Greenland. https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-eyes-a-new-real-estate-purchase-greenland-11565904223.
Stashwick, S. (2016, November 4). US navy upgrading undersea sub-detecting sensor network. https://thediplomat.com/2016/11/us-navy-upgrading-undersea-sub-detecting-sensor-network/.
Turnowsky, W. (2018, September 17). Amerikansk forsvar vil investere i grønlandske lufthavne. https://sermitsiaq.ag/node/208366.
Villaume, P. (1997). Henrik Kauffmann, den kolde krig og de falske toner. Historisk Tidsskrift, 16(6), 493–511.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rahbek-Clemmensen, J., Nielsen, L.J. (2020). The Middleman—The Driving Forces Behind Denmark’s Arctic Policy. In: Weber, J. (eds) Handbook on Geopolitics and Security in the Arctic. Frontiers in International Relations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45005-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45005-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45004-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45005-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)