Skip to main content

Bail Reform in Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking Bail

Abstract

Many progressive reforms and initiatives are happening in criminal courts at a time when the imprisonment rate is rising. This chapter locates these developments as part of debates that started in the eighteenth century on whether the criminal justice system should be concerned with punishing rational offenders or assisting those not responsible for their actions. Restorative justice involves defendants being diverted to conferences in which they apologize to victims. Therapeutic jurisprudence gives judicial officers a healing role in conducting legal proceedings. A third movement, pretrial services, is less well known but has even greater potential to transform the criminal justice system. This chapter provides a critical overview, considering costs and benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Wacquant (2009) makes a stronger argument in relation to African Americans, a larger proportion of the population in the USA. Tough laws have been targeted against offending in this “underclass”, while at the same time welfare benefits have been removed.

  2. 2.

    For an introduction to this extensive literature, see Johnstone (2013).

  3. 3.

    For an overview, see Daly and Hayes (1997).

  4. 4.

    Criminologists often attribute greater punitiveness in the UK criminal justice system to neo-liberalism (Bell 2011). There has, arguably, been a missed opportunity for bail reform as a consequence of austerity measures that started before the 2007–08 Global Financial Crisis, although at the same time an expansion in restorative justice programs.

  5. 5.

    See VanNostrand and Rose (2009). It is sometimes difficult to identify from these studies the extent to which the remand rate has fallen or whether this has reduced the overall imprisonment rate.

References

  • Baughman, S. 2018 The Bail Book: A Comprehensive Look at Bail in America’s Criminal Justice System. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beccaria, C. 1995/1764 On Crimes and Punishment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E. 2011 Criminal Justice and Neoliberalism. Palgrave, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. 1989 Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, S. and Peyrot, M. 2003. “‘Tough love’: Nurturing and coercing responsibility and recovery in California drug courts”. Social Problems. Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 416–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, T. and Allnutt, S. 2003 Mental Health among NSW Prisoners. Corrections Health Service, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellano, U. 2011 Outsourcing Justice: The Role of Non-profit Caseworkers in Pretrial Release Programs. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. and Henry, D. 2003 Pretrial Services Programming at the Start of the 21st Century. US Department of Justice, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clear, T. and Frost, N. 2014 The Punishment Imperative: The Rise and Failure of Mass Incarceration in America. New York University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C. and White, R. 2007 Juvenile Justice: Youth and Crime in Australia. 3rd Edition. Oxford University Press, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C., Baldry, E., Brown, D. and Schwartz, M. 2013 Penal Culture and Hyperincarceration: The Revival of the Prison. UNSW Law Research Paper No. 2014–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. and Hayes, H. 1997 “Restorative justice and conferencing”. In A. Graycar and P. Grabosky (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Australian Criminology. Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, pp. 294–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Human Services 2005 The CREDIT Bail Support Program. Victorian Government, Melbourne. http://docs.health.vic.gov.au/docs/doc/A69711BC8E6A78DFCA25789600025ADF/$FILE/credit-bail-support.pdf. Accessed November 2018.

  • Donnelly, K. 2015 Adolphe Quetelet, Social Physics and the Average Men of Science 1796–1874. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, N. and Corben, S. 2018 Evaluation of the Bail Assessment Officer (BAO) Intervention. Crime and Justice Bulletin No. 209. NSW Bureau of Crime and Statistics and Research, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, J. 2014. Transforming Criminal Justice? Problem-Solving and Court Specialisation. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drakeford, M., Haines, K., Cotton, B. and Octigan, M. 2001 Pre-trial Services and the Future of Probation. University of Wales Press, Cardiff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 2014/1873 The Division of Labour in Society. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. and Welsh, B. 2012 The Oxford Handbook of Crime Prevention: Towards a New Crime Policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1995/1975 Discipline and Punish. Vintage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freiberg, A. 2010 Post-adversarial and post-inquisitorial justice: Transcending traditional penological paradigms. Monash University Research Paper No. 2010/17. Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. 2001 The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. 2018/1985 Punishment and Welfare: A History of Penal Strategies. Quid Pro Books, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah-Moffat, K. and Maurutto, P. 2013 “Shifting and targeted forms of penal governance: Bail, punishment and specialized courts”. Theoretical Criminology. Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 201–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, D. 2003 The Criminal Body: Lombroso and the Anatomy of Deviance. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hucklesby, A. 2003 Bail Support Schemes for Adults. Policy Press, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, G. 2013 A Restorative Justice Reader. 2nd Edition. Willan, Cullompton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magistrates Court of Tasmania 2008 Tasmania’s Court Mandated Drug Diversion Program: Evaluation Report. Magistrates Court of Tasmania, Hobart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, R. 1974 “What works? Questions and answers about prison reform”. The Public Interest. Vol. 35, pp. 22–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice 2012 Restorative Justice Action Plan. Ministry of Justice, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, D. 2001 Reinventing Justice: The American Drug Court Movement. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A and Bartkowiak-Théron, I. 2014. “Policing Youth Curfews: the ‘Wee Willie Winkie’ model of enforcing bail conditions”. Australasian Policing. Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturz, H. 1963. “The Manhattan Bail Project: An Interim Report on the Use of Pre-Trial Parole”. New York University Law Review. Vol. 38, pp. 67–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, M. 2012 The Sentencing of Children: Professional Work and Perspectives. New Academia Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanNostrand, M. and Keebler, G. 2009 “Pretrial risk assessment in the Federal Court”. Federal Probation. Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanNostrand, M. and Rose, K. 2009 The Virginia Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument. Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services, Virginia. http://www.pretrial.org/download/risk-assessment/VA%20Risk%20Report%202009.pdf. Accessed November 2018.

  • Wacquant, L. 2009 Punishing the Poor. Duke University Press, Durham NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnick, B. and Wexler, B. 2003 Judging in a Therapeutic Key: Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Courts. Carolina Press, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Travers .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Travers, M., Colvin, E., Bartkowiak-Théron, I., Sarre, R., Day, A., Bond, C. (2020). Bail Reform in Context. In: Rethinking Bail. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44881-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44881-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44880-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44881-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics