Skip to main content

Sustainable Transmission Investment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 391 Accesses

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 292))

Abstract

In Chaps. 46, we treated operational and investment problems from the perspective of power companies. In particular, these firms’ decisions concern generation-capacity expansion and offerings to the electricity market given a particular transmission network. Consequently, the impact of various environmental policies could be examined while taking into account the physical constraints of the network, which are often paramount to the exertion of market power. However, since some environmental policies, e.g., renewable portfolio standards (RPS), aim to incentivize investment in renewable energy (RE) technologies, either expansions to or reinforcements of the transmission grid are necessary. Yet, as discussed in Chap. 1, the restructured nature of the power sector in most OECD countries means that transmission planning is typically conducted by a welfare-maximizing transmission system operator (TSO), whereas generation expansion and operations are carried out by profit-maximizing power companies. Thus, a credible assessment of policy proposals requires a suitable framework that models this distinction between decision makers’ motives directly. Toward that end, we propose a bi-level modeling approach in this chapter in which a TSO at the upper level makes transmission-expansion decisions while constrained by the generators’ decisions at the lower level. After a discussion of the role of the TSO and a survey of the literature, we develop two types of models. Initially, we formulate a benchmark central-planning model that abstracts from the realities of restructured power sectors to provide first-best policy insights stemming from optimal generation and transmission investment in response to the cost of damage from CO\(_2\) emissions. Next, a bi-level modeling approach is taken in which the TSO at the upper level must anticipate the response of industry’s generation-capacity investment and operations. The effectiveness of a carbon tax in inducing socially optimal behavior by industry is investigated. We conclude the chapter with a summary of its content and extensions to the models therein. GAMS codes for implementing the approaches are provided at the end of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baldick, R., Kahn, E.: Transmission planning issues in a competitive economic environment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 8, 1497–1503 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baringo, L., Conejo, A.J.: Transmission and wind power investment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27, 885–893 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Borenstein, S., Bushnell, J., Stoft, S.: The competitive effects of transmission capacity in a deregulated electricity industry. RAND J. Econ. 31, 294–325 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bravo, D., Sauma, E.E., Contreras, J., de la Torre, S., Aguado, J.A., Pozo, D.: Impact of network payment schemes on transmission expansion planning with variable renewable generation. Ener. Econ. 56, 410–421 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bylling, H., Gabriel, S.A., Boomsma, T.K.: A parametric programming approach to bilevel optimisation with lower-level variables in the upper level. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Forthcoming (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Conejo, A.J., Baringo, L., Kazempour, S.J., Siddiqui, A.S.: Investment in Electricity Generation and Transmission: Decision Making under Uncertainty. Springer International, Cham, Switzerland (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. de Arce, M.P., Sauma, E.E.: Comparison of incentive policies for renewable energy in an oligopolistic market with price-responsive demand. The Ener. J. 37, 159–198 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dorn, W.S.: Duality in quadratic programming. Q. Appl. Math. 18, 155–162 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Downward, A.: Carbon charges in electricity markets with strategic behavior and transmission. Ener. J. 31, 159–166 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fortuny-Amat, J., McCarl, B.: A representation and economic interpretation of a two-level programming problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 9, 783–792 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcés, L.P., Conejo, A.J., García-Bertrand, R., Romero, R.: A bilevel approach to the transmission expansion planning within a market environment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 24, 1513–1522 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gabriel, S.A., Conejo, A.J., Fuller, J.D., Hobbs, B.F., Ruiz, C.: Complementarity Modeling in Energy Markets. Springer, New York (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Garver, L.L.: Transmission network estimation using linear programming. IEEE Trans. Power Apparat. Syst. 89, 1688–1697 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hashimoto, H.: A spatial Nash equilibrium model. In: Harker, P.T. (ed.) Spatial Price Equilibria: Advances in Theory, Computation, and Application. Springer (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hobbs, B.F.: Optimization methods for electric utility resource planning. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 83, 1–20 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hobbs, B.F.: Linear complementarity models of Nash-Cournot competition in bilateral and POOLCO power markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 16, 194–202 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huppmann, D., Egerer, J.: National-strategic investment in European power transmission capacity. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 247, 191–203 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kazempour, S.J., Conejo, A.J.: Strategic generation investment under uncertainty via Benders decomposition. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27, 424–432 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maurovich-Horvat, L., Boomsma, T.K., Siddiqui, A.S.: Transmission and wind investment in a deregulated electricity industry. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30, 1633–1643 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Munoz, F.D., Sauma, E.E., Hobbs, B.F.: Approximations in power transmission planning: implications for the cost and performance of renewable portfolio standards. J. Reg. Econ. 43, 305–338 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reta-Hernández, M.: Transmission line parameters. In: Grigsby, L.L. (ed.) Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution. CRC Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sauma, E.E., Oren, S.S.: Proactive planning and valuation of transmission investments in restructured electricity markets. J. Reg. Econ. 30, 261–290 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sauma, E.E., Oren, S.S.: Economic criteria for planning transmission investment in restructured electricity markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22, 1394–1405 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sauma, E.E., Oren, S.S.: Do generation firms in restructured electricity markets have incentives to support social-welfare-improving transmission investments? Ener. Econ. 31, 676–689 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Siddiqui, A.S., Tanaka, M., Chen, Y.: Sustainable transmission planning in imperfectly competitive electricity industries: balancing economic and environmental outcomes. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 275, 208–223 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wogrin, S., Hobbs, B.F., Ralph, D., Centeno, E., Barquin, J.: Open versus closed loop capacity equilibria in electricity markets under perfect and oligopolistic competition. Math. Prog. 140, 295–322 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yihsu Chen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chen, Y., Siddiqui, A.S., Tanaka, M. (2020). Sustainable Transmission Investment. In: Analysis of Environmental Policy in the Power Sector. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 292. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44866-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics