Skip to main content

More Than Two Players

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Scissors and Rock

Abstract

If there are more than two players in a game, then there is a potential for forming coalitions. The Core is the most prominent solution concept in this case. It assigns payoff vectors to the players. However, the Core of an n-person game can be empty or contain an infinite number of possible outcome vectors. In this chapter, applying the Core to a network game illustrates this problem. As a consequence, alternative solution concepts are briefly discussed: the Stable Set concept, proposed by von Neumannand Morgenstern, as the Solution; Bargaining Sets that are based on objections and (successful) counterobjections; the Kernel and the Nucleolus. Results are confronted with the problem of competition and cooperation in the triad.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    If the game between S and N\S cannot be reduced to a zero-sum game, we differentiate between value \(v_{\upalpha} \left(\text{S} \right)\) that S may secure against resistance of coalition N\S, and value \(v_{\upbeta} \left(\text{S} \right)\) for S that coalition N\S cannot prevent, thus defining the \(\upalpha\)- and \(\upbeta\)-characteristic function.

  2. 2.

    Max Weber (1948 [1924]: 180) suggests that “…we understand by ‘power’ the chance of a man or of a number of men to realize their own will in a communal action even against the resistance of others who are participating in the action.”

  3. 3.

    Faulhaber (1995) writes on network effects in supplying water, while Holler (1991), referring to Faulhaber’s contribution, discusses the model with respect to “fair and efficient public pricing” in sewage farming.

  4. 4.

    Anyone wanting to see the details, please turn the book such that (0, 1000, 0) and thereafter (0, 0, 1000) is on top. The parallel restriction lines regarding the fees of communities 2 and 3 are easily recognized.

  5. 5.

    The English translation “The Prince” reduces Machiavelli’s use of “Il Principe” to a certain extent; he calls the institution holding the power in the state “Principe,” irrespective of whether it is a monarchy, a tyranny or a republic. This becomes clear in his second main work: the “Discorsi.” It refers to the Roman Republic. Its subtitle is “Thoughts about Politics and Governing.” However, the following quotations are taken from “Il Principe.”

References

  • Faulhaber, G. R. (1995). Cross-subsidization. Pricing in public enterprises. American Economic Review,65, 966–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follesdal, A. (2015). Machiavelli at 500: From cynic to vigilant supporter of international law. Ratio Juris,28, 242–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, D. (1994). Competition in the network industry: The telephone industry, 1894–1910. Journal of Economic History,54, 543–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildenbrand, W., & Kirman, A. P. (1976). Introduction to equilibrium analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M. J. (1991). Fair and efficient public pricing: An application to sewage farming. Journal of Regional Policy,11, 543–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M. J. (2003). On the regulation of telecommunications markets. In EURAS Yearbook of Standardization (Vol. 4) (Homo Oeconomicus 20). München: Accedo-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M. J., & Widgrén, M. (1999). The value of a coalition is power. Homo Oeconomicus,15, 497–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knieps, G. (1983). Is technological revolution a sufficient reason for changing the system of regulation? The case of telecommunications. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft (Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics),13, 578–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (1882 [1532]). The Prince. The historical, political, and diplomatic writings of Niccolò Machiavelli (Vol. 4) (C. E. Detmold, Trans.). Boston: James R. Osgood and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). The theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. (1995). Game theory (3rd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnino, P. (Ed.). (1982 [1740]). Frederick of Prussia: The refutation of Machiavelli’s Prince or Anti-Machiavel, Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1948 [1924]). Class, status and party. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), Essays from Max Weber, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manfred J. Holler .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Holler, M.J., Klose-Ullmann, B. (2020). More Than Two Players. In: Scissors and Rock. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44823-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics