Abstract
This chapter contains a short review on evaluation models and an introduction into structure oriented evaluation.
The chapter starts with the basic definitions and gives an overview on recent evaluation models in chronological order. The following models are considered: the object-/goal-oriented model, Kirkpatrick’s four-level model, the consumer-oriented model, the CIPP model, Taba’s model, the discrepancy model, the CIRO model, the goal-free model, the transactional model, Eisner’s connoisseurship model, the logic model, the five level ROI model, the decision-making model, Kaufman’s five level model, the P3 model, the unfolding model, the PDPP model, the expertise-oriented model, the participant-oriented model, and the theory-driven model.
The second part of this chapter introduces into structure oriented evaluation model. Thereby the main concept is presented of structure oriented evaluation and the single steps of this model are explained based on an abstract example.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bayar-Erdene, L. (2019). Evaluation of faculty members by structure oriented evaluation. Doctoral Thesis, Mongolian University of Science and Technology, Ulaanbaatar.
Boulmetis, J., & Dutwin, P. (2011). The ABCs of evaluation: Timeless techniques for program and project managers (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Coryn, C. L. S., Noakes, L. A., Westine, C. D., & Schröter, D. C. (2011). A systematic review of theory-driven evaluation practice from 1990 to 2009. American Journal of Evaluation, 32(2), 199–226. Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010389321
Deller, J. (2019a). The Complete Philips ROI Model Tutorial for Beginners. Available from https://kodosurvey.com/blog/complete-philips-roi-model-tutorial-beginners
Deller, J. (2019b). Kaufman’s Model of Learning Evaluation: Key Concepts and Tutorial. Available from https://kodosurvey.com/blog/kaufmans-model-learning-evaluation-key-concepts-and-tutorial
Donaldson, S. I. (2012). Evaluation theory and practice. Connections: European Evaluation Society, 2, 8–12.
Donmoyer, R. (2014). Elliot Eisner’s lost legacy. Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214014537398
Eisner, E. W. (1975). The perceptive eye: Toward the reformation of educational evaluation. Washington: American Educational Research Association.
Eisner, E. W. (1985). The art of educational evaluation: a personal view. London: Falmer Press.
Fitzpatrick, J., Sanders, J., & Worthen, B. (2004). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Fitzpatrick, J., Sanders, J., & Worthen, B. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Fred, C. L. (2011). Curriculum development: Inductive models. Schooling, 2(1), 1–8.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Heller, A. (2013). Systemeigenschaft Robustheit - Ein Ansatz zur Bewertung und Maximierung von Robustheit eingebetteter Systeme. PhD Thesis, Win. Schriftenreihe ‘Eingebettete, Selbstorganisierende Systeme’ (Vol. 12). Universitätsverlag Chemnitz.
Kaufman, R., Keller, J., & Watkins, R. (2007). What works and what doesn’t: Evaluation beyond Kirkpatrick. Performance and Instruction, 35(2), 8–12. Available from http://home.gwu.edu/~rwatkins/articles/whatwork.PDF
Khan, B. H. (2004). The People, process and product continuum in e-learning: The e-learning P3 model. Educational Technology, 44(5), 33–40. Available from http://asianvu.com/bookstoread/etp/elearning-p3model.pdf
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs. The four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Madaus, G. G., Scriven, M. S., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1984). Educational evaluation and accountability: A review of quality assurance efforts. American Behavioral Scientist, 27(5), 649–673.
Phillips, J. J. (1991). Handbook of evaluation and measurement methods. London: Gulf Press.
Provus, M. M. (1969). The discrepancy evaluation model: An approach to local program improvement and development (124 pp.). Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh Public Schools.
Rippey, R. M. (1973). Studies in transactional evaluation. Berkeley: McCutchan.
Rossi, P. H., & Wright, S. R. (1979). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Ruhe, V., & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Evaluation in distance education and E-learning: The unfolding model (206 pp.). New York: Guilford. ISBN: 978-1-59385-872-8.
Scriven, M. S. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation, AERA monograph series on curriculum evaluation (Vol. 1, pp. 39–81). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Scriven, M. (1973). Goal-free evaluation. In E. R. House (Ed.), School evaluation: The politics and process (pp. 319–328). Berkeley: McCutchan.
Scriven, M. S. (1991). Pros and cons about goal-free evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 12(1), 55–76.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1968). Evaluation as enlightenment for decision making. Columbus: Evaluation Center, Ohio State University.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. Evaluation in Education and Human Service, 6, 117–141.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1994). Empowerment evaluation, objectivist evaluation, and evaluation standards: Where the future of evaluation should not go and where it needs to go. American Journal of Evaluation, 15, 321–338.
Suchman, E. A. (1967). Evaluative research: Principles and practice in public service and social action programs. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Tudevdagva, U., & Hardt, W. (2011). A new evaluation model for e-learning programs. Technical Report CSR-11-03, Chemnitz University of Technology.
Tudevdagva, U., & Hardt, W. (2012). A measure theoretical evaluation model for e-learning programs. In Proceedings of the IADIS on e-Society, Berlin (pp. 44–52).
Tudevdagva, U., Hardt, W., Tsoy, E. B., & Grif, M. G. (2012). New approach for E-learning evaluation. In Proceedings of the 7th International Forum on Strategic Technology 2012, Tomsk, September 17–21, 2012 (pp. 712–715).
Tudevdagva, U., Heller, A., & Hardt, W. (2013a). A model for robustness evaluation of embedded systems. In Proceedings of the IFOST 2013 Conference, Ulaanbaatar (pp. 288–292).
Tudevdagva, U., Hardt, W., & Jargalmaa, D. (2013b). The development of logical structures for e-learning evaluation. In Proceedings of the IADIS on e-learning 2013, Prag, Czech Republic (pp. 431–435).
Tudevdagva, U., Tomorchodor, L., & Hardt, W. (2014a). The beta version of implementation tool for SURE model. 11th Joint Conference on Knowledge-Based Software Engineering (JCKBSE 2014), Volgograd, September 17–20, 2014. Washington: IEEE Computer Society. In Journal of Communications in Computer and Information Science, 466, 243–251.
Tudevdagva, U., Hardt, W., & Bayar-Erdene, L. (2014b). The SURE model for evaluation of complex processes and tool for implementation. In The 9th International Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST 2014), Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Chittagong, October 21–23, 2014. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
Tudevdagva, U., Bayar-Erdene, L., & Hardt, W. (2014c). A self-assessment system for faculty based on the evaluation SURE model. In Proceedings of The 5th International Conference on Industrial Convergence Technology, ICICT2014, May 10–11, 2014 (pp. 266–269). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society. ISBN 978-99973-46-29-2.
Tudevdagva, U., Jargalmaa, D. & Bayar-Erdene, L., (2014d), Case Study of Structure Oriented Evaluation Model, in Proceedings of The International Summer School on E-learning, Embedded system and International cooperation, SS2014, 7–13 July, 2014, Laubusch, Germany (pp. 41–44). ISSN 0947-5125.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic model development guide: Using logic models to bring together planning, evaluation, and action. Battle Creek: W. K. Kellogg Foundation.
Warr, P., Bird, M., & Rackham, N. (1970). Evaluation of management training: A practical framework with cases, for evaluating training needs and results (112 pp.). London: Gower Press.
Weiss, C. (1998). Evaluation (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Wholey, J. S. (1979). Evaluation: Promise and performance. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Zhang, W., & Cheng, Y. L. (2012). Quality assurance in E-learning: PDPP evaluation model and its application. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(3), 66–82. Available from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1001012.pdf. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1181
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tudevdagva, U. (2020). Introduction. In: Structure-Oriented Evaluation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44806-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44806-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44805-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44806-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)