Skip to main content

The Influence of Cognitive Biases on Supply Chain Risk Management in the Context of Digitalization Projects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Logistics ((LNLO))

Abstract

Supply chains became more complex, widespread and vulnerable to disruptions over the past years, above all else due to an increasing digitalization in all industries. An effective supply chain risk management (SCRM) requires human decision-making in all phases, especially when it comes to manage the risks of digital applications. However, researchers in various disciplines showed that human decisions are often biased and hence not fully rational as typically assumed in SCRM research and practice. This leads to potential risks being missed completely, their likelihood being underestimated or to insufficient mitigation strategies being applied. We contribute to this issue by combining a systematic literature review on SCRM and cognitive biases (CB) with insights from practice. We present several use cases of digitalization projects in different industries to show the influence of CB on the risk identification, risk assessment and risk mitigation. Based on this, we provide first guidelines for theory and practice on how to consider CB in designing a successful SCRM and thus, how to make digitalized supply chains more resilient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Xu, L.D., Xu, E.: Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. IJPR 56, 2941–2962 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Holford, D.: The future of human creative knowledge work within the digital economy. Futures 105(1), 143–154 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fahimnia, B., Pournader, M., Siemsen, E., Bendoly, E.: Behavioral operations and supply chain management – a review and literature mapping. Decis. Sci. 50, 11 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 18(4157), 1124–1131 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aven, T.: Risk assessment and risk management: review of recent advances on their foundation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 253(1), 1–13 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., Talluri, S.: Supply chain risk management: a literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(16), 5031–5069 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Prakash, S., Soni, G., Rathore, A.: A critical analysis of SCRM content: a structured literature review. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 14(1), 69–90 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tummala, R., Schoenherr, T.: Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process (SCRMP). Supply Chain. Manag. 16(6), 474–483 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rao, S., Goldsby, T.J.: Supply chain risks: a review and typology. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 20(1), 97–123 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Simon, H.A.: A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 69(1), 99–118 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Arnott, D.: Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: a design science approach. Inf. Syst. J. 16(1), 55–78 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahneman, D.: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Nov. Prize Lit. Am. Psychol. 58(9), 697–721 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Platform Industry 4.0 Website. https://www.plattform-i40.de. Accessed 20 Dec 2016

  14. Ellsberg, D.: Risk ambiguity and the savage axioms. Q. J. Econ. 75(4), 643–669 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaufmann, L., Carter, C.: Debiasing the supplier selection decision: a taxonomy and conceptualization. IJPDLM 40(10), 792–821 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Larrick, R.P.: Debiasing. In: Koehler, D.; Harvey, N.: Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, pp. 316–337. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Valacich, J.S., Schwenk, C.R.: Devil’s advocacy and dialectical inquiry effects on face-to-face and computer-mediated group decision making. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 63(2), 158–173 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia C. Arlinghaus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arlinghaus, J.C., Zimmermann, M., Zahner, M. (2020). The Influence of Cognitive Biases on Supply Chain Risk Management in the Context of Digitalization Projects. In: Freitag, M., Haasis, HD., Kotzab, H., Pannek, J. (eds) Dynamics in Logistics. LDIC 2020. Lecture Notes in Logistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44783-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44783-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44782-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44783-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics