Skip to main content

Rule Generation of Cataract Patient Data Using Random Forest Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 620 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11886))

Abstract

Cataract is one of the common problems among the humans. Cataract is the condition caused due to clouding of lens in the eye which eventually may lead to blindness. In last few years, data mining has been widely used to build the predictive model in various fields. In this paper, historical data of cataract patient has been used to build the predictive model. Random forest algorithm is one of the decision tree algorithms for predictive modeling. Random forest algorithm incorporates advantages of classification and regression. Present study uses random forest method to create a model for prediction of cataract. The random forest algorithm is also tested for Out of Bag estimation error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anyanwu, M.N., Shiva, S.G.: Comparative analysis of serial decision tree classification algorithms. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Secur. (IJCSS) 3(3), 230–240 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma, H., Kumar, S.: A survey on decision tree algorithms of classification in data mining. Int. J. Sci. Res. (IJSR) 5, 2094–2097 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta, B., et al.: Analysis of various decision tree algorithms for classification in data mining. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 163(8), 15–19 (2017). (0975–8887)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kesavaraj, G., Sukumaran, S.: A study on classification techniques in data mining. IEEE-31661, 4–6 July 2013

    Google Scholar 

  5. Black, P.E.: Greedy Algorithm, in Dictionary of Algorithms and Data Structures, U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, February 2005. NIST-greedy algorithm

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alaoui, S.S., Labsiv, Y., Aksasse, B.: Classification algorithms in data mining. Int. J. Tomogr. Simul 31, 34–44 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Breiman, L. Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

  8. Goel, E., et al.: Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. 7(1), 251–257 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brieman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Uwe, K., Dunemann, S.O.: SQL database primitives for decision tree classifiers. In: CIKM 2001. ACM, Atlanta (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Denil, M., et al.: Narrowing the gap: random forests in theory and in practice. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning, Beijing, China, vol. 32. JMLR: W&CP (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaur, S., Grewal, A.K.: A review paper on data mining classification techniques for detection of lung cancer. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. (IRJET) 03(11), 1334–1338 (2016). e-ISSN: 2395-0056, p-ISSN: 2395-0072

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parashar, H.J., Vijendra, S., Vasudeva, N.: An efficient classification approach for data mining. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. 2(4), 466 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar, S.V.K., Kiruthika, P.: An overview of classification algorithm in data mining. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 4(12), 255–257 (2015). ISSN (Online) 2278-1021, ISSN (Print) 2319 5940

    Google Scholar 

  15. https://www.who.int/blindness/causes/priority/en/index1.html. Accessed 29 Sept 2019

  16. Janitza, S., Hornung, R.: On the overestimation of random forest’s out-of-bag error. PLoS ONE 13(8), e0201904 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hastie, T., et al.: The Elements of Statistical Learning Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Nayer, A.M.: Detecting diabetes mellitus using machine learning. Int. J. Comput. Syst. 03(12), 670–677 (2016). ISSN 2394-1065

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beaulac, C., Rosenthal, J.S.: Predicting university students academic success and major using random forest (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09546-y

  20. Sugandhi, C., Yasodha, P., Kannan, M.: Analysis of a population of cataract patients databases in weka tool. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2(10), 1 (2011). ISSN 2229-5518

    Google Scholar 

  21. Niya, C.P.: Automatic cataract detection and classification systems: a survey. TechS Vidya e-J. Res. 3(2014–15), 28–36 (2015). ISSN 2322-0791

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mamta Santosh Nair or Umesh Kumar Pandey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nair, M.S., Pandey, U.K. (2020). Rule Generation of Cataract Patient Data Using Random Forest Algorithm. In: Tiwary, U., Chaudhury, S. (eds) Intelligent Human Computer Interaction. IHCI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11886. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44689-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44689-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44688-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44689-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics