Abstract
Narratives of economic growth and reform are normatively centred around a notion of development that often tends to exclude the welfare and participation of vulnerable groups (especially women). Over the past few decades, the importance of gender equality and labour reforms has led to substantive changes in the domain of economic policy-making and the methods of data gathering which has resulted in the promotion of critical discourses on feminist economics, inclusive growth and the rights of women. This chapter utilizes these emerging discourses and applies them to two separate case studies of India and China. Post-reform growth experiences of the two states in the 2000–2015 period reveal insights into the relationship between gender equality and existing definitions of growth. Existing literature and studies, as well as data from the World Bank Gender Statistics is used to analyse the growth reforms with three core themes in each country during this period—labour force participation rate, gendered distribution of earnings, and developments in the care economy. A feminist re-imagination of growth is suggested for both nations alongside their need to consider individual incentives to employment while making macro-level reform choices to promote inclusive growth.
Srivatsan Manivannan is a researcher on gender relations and an alumnus from the Jindal School of Liberal Arts and Humanities, O.P. Jindal Global University. Deepanshu Mohan is an Associate Professor and Director, Centre for New Economics Studies, O.P. Jindal Global University
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
See Becker, Gary S., Kevin M. Murphy, and Robert Tamura. “Human capital, fertility, and economic growth.” Journal of political economy 98.5, Part 2 (1990): S12–S37; Ehrlich, Isaac, and Francis T. Lui. “Intergenerational trade, longevity, and economic growth.” Journal of Political Economy 99.5 (1991): 1029–1059; Fernandez, Raquel, and Alessandra Fogli. “Culture: An empirical investigation of beliefs, work, and fertility.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 1.1 (2009): 146–177; Dollar, David, and Roberta Gatti. Gender inequality, income, and growth: are good times good for women?. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Development Research Group, The World Bank, 1999; Steinberg, Chad, and Mr. Masato Nakane. Can women save Japan?. No. 12–248. International Monetary Fund, 2012.
- 2.
Developmental Growth must be seen as a process where productivity growth—in terms of increase in economic production and consumption-compliments the development processes in areas of social and economic indicators (say, reduction in absolute poverty and improved access to basic social services, healthcare, education).
- 3.
Gatti, supra note 1.
- 4.
Gender Statistics, The World Bank.
- 5.
Cuberes, David, and Marc Teignier. “Gender inequality and economic growth: A critical review.” Journal of International Development 26.2 (2014): 260–276.
- 6.
Ibid.
- 7.
Jaumotte, Florence. “Female labour force participation: past trends and main determinants in OECD countries.” (2003).
- 8.
Gonzales, Mr. Christian, et al. Fair Play: More Equal Laws Boost Female Labor Force Participation. International Monetary Fund, 2015.
- 9.
Berniell, M. I., and Sánchez-Páramo, C. (2011). “Overview of Time Use Data Used for the Analysis of Gender Differences in Time Use Patterns.” Background Paper for the World Development Report 2012.
- 10.
Oded Galor and David N. Weil [1996] and Nils-Petter Lagerlöf [2003]; Cavalcanti, Tiago V. de and José Tavares. 2007. “The Output Costs of Gender Discrimination: A Model-Based Macroeconomic Estimate.” Mimeograph, University of Lisbon.
- 11.
Klasen and Lamanna supra note 10.
- 12.
See Dollar, David, and Roberta Gatti. Gender inequality, income, and growth: are good times good for women?. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Development Research Group, The World Bank, 1999.
- 13.
See Mark Blackden, Sudharshan Canagarajah, Stephen Klasen, and David Lawson [2007].
- 14.
Cavalcanti and Tavares (2007).
- 15.
Seguino, Stephanie. “Gender inequality and economic growth: A cross-country analysis.” World Development 28.7 (2000): 1211–1230.); Seguino, Stephanie. “Accounting for gender in Asian economic growth.” Feminist Economics 6.3 (2000): 27–58.
- 16.
Amartya Sen [1990]; Lawrence James Haddad, John Hoddinott, and Harold Alderman [1997]; Duncan Thomas [1997]; World Bank [2001]; Stephan Klasen and Claudia Wink [2003]; and King, Klasen, and Porter [2008]).
- 17.
See Seguino, Stephanie, and Maria Sagrario Floro. “Does gender have any effect on aggregate saving? An empirical analysis.” International Review of Applied Economics 17.2 (2003): 147–166.
- 18.
See Thomas, Duncan. “Incomes, expenditures, and health outcomes: Evidence on intrahousehold resource allocation.” Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries (1997): 142–164; and World Bank [2001].
- 19.
See Paul, Tanusree, and Saraswati Raju. “Gendered labour in India.” Economic & Political Weekly 49.29 (2014): 197.
- 20.
See Chaudhary, Ruchika, and Sher Verick. Female labour force participation in India and beyond. New Delhi: ILO, 2014.
- 21.
See Agarwal, Bina. ““Bargaining” and gender relations: Within and beyond the household.” Feminist economics 3.1 (1997): 1–51.
- 22.
See Jain, Devaki. “Women’s quest for power.” Five Case Studies Sponsored by Indian Council for Social Science Research, New Delhi, Vikas (1979).
- 23.
Ibid.
- 24.
Connelly, Rachel, et al. “The Care Economy in Post-Reform China: Feminist Research on Unpaid and Paid Work and Well-Being.” (2018): 1–30.
- 25.
United Nations Research Institute for Social Development [UNRISD] 2010.
- 26.
Becker, Gary S., and H. Gregg Lewis. “On the Interaction between the Quantity and Quality of Children.” Journal of political Economy 81.2, Part 2 (1973): S279–S288.
- 27.
Çağatay, Nilüfer, and Şule Özler. “Feminization of the labor force: The effects of long-term development and structural adjustment.” World development 23.11 (1995): 1883–1894; Van Staveren, Irene, et al., eds. The feminist economics of trade. Routledge, 2012.
- 28.
Becker, Gary S. “A Theory of the Allocation of Time.” The economic journal (1965): 493–517.
- 29.
Supra note 82.
- 30.
See Elson, Diane. “Talking to the boys. C. Jackson, and R.” (1998).
- 31.
Ibid.
- 32.
Ho, Yee Lim. “Women on the Edges of Hong Kong Modernity.” Spaces of Their Own: Women’s Public Sphere in Transnational China (2001): 162–190.
- 33.
Berik, Günseli, Xiao-yuan Dong, and Gale Summerfield. “China’s transition and feminist economics.” Feminist Economics 13.3–13.4 (2007): 1–33.
- 34.
State Council, 2010.
- 35.
Lie et al. 2008 + that article.
- 36.
Yang and Chen 2013.
- 37.
Li 2011.
- 38.
Supra note 3 (modeled ILO estimate).
- 39.
Supra note 35.
- 40.
See Rani, Uma and Jeemol Unni. 2009. “Do Economic Reforms Influence Home-Based Work? Evidence from India.” Feminist Economics 15(3): 191–225.
- 41.
See Berik, Günseli, Yana van der Meulen Rodgers, and Stephanie Seguino. “Feminist economics of inequality, development, and growth.” Feminist economics 15.3 (2009): 1–33.
- 42.
Supra note 3.
- 43.
Ibid.
- 44.
Hnatkovska, Viktoria, and Amartya Lahiri. “Structural transformation and the rural-urban divide.” University of British Columbia, typescript (2013).
- 45.
Klasen, Stephan, and Janneke Pieters. What explains the stagnation of female labor force participation in urban India?. The World Bank, 2015.
- 46.
Datt, Gaurav, Martin Ravallion, and Rinku Murgai. Growth, urbanization, and poverty reduction in India. The World Bank, 2016.
- 47.
Ibid.
- 48.
Ibid.; MHRD, India.
- 49.
Supra note 3 (modeled ILO estimate).
- 50.
Ara, Shamim. “Globalisation and Gender Inequality: Evidence from Labour Market in India.” Journal of Quantitative Economics (2018): 1–28.
- 51.
Ibid.
- 52.
Ibid.
- 53.
Das, Mr. Sonali, et al. Women workers in India: why so few among so many?. No. 15–55. International Monetary Fund, 2015.
- 54.
Chatterjee, 2015.
- 55.
Bhalotra, 1998; Papola and Sahu, 2012; Kannen and Raveendran, 2009; Chowdhury, 2011.
- 56.
Supra note 3.
- 57.
Ibid.
- 58.
Maurer-Fazio, Margaret, et al. “Childcare, eldercare, and labor force participation of married women in urban China, 1982–2000.” Journal of Human Resources 46.2 (2011): 261–294.
- 59.
2010 National Dynamic Monitoring Survey of Floating Populations.
- 60.
Supra note 1.
- 61.
Jia, Nan, Xiao-yuan Dong, and Yue-ping Song. “Paid Maternity Leave and Breastfeeding in Urban China.” Feminist Economics 24.2 (2018): 31–53; Liu, Lan, Xiao-yuan Dong, and Xiaoying Zheng. “Parental care and married women’s labor supply in urban China.” Feminist Economics 16.3 (2010): 169–192.
- 62.
Ibid.
- 63.
Supra note 3.
- 64.
Ibid.
- 65.
Ibid (modeled ILO estimate).
- 66.
Ibid.
- 67.
Supra note 21; Du, Fenglian, and Xiao-yuan Dong. “Women’s employment and child care choices in urban China during the economic transition.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 62.1 (2013): 131–155.
- 68.
Ibid.
- 69.
Supra note 1.
- 70.
Qi, Liangshu, and Xiao-yuan Dong. “Unpaid Care Work’s Interference with Paid Work and the Gender Earnings Gap in China.” Feminist Economics 22.2 (2016): 143–167.
- 71.
Cook, Sarah, and Xiao-yuan Dong. “Gender, welfare and the economy of care in reform era China: How the welfare system shapes women’s opportunities and gender equality.” Handbook of Welfare in China (2017): 266–268; Shang, Xiaoyuan, and Xiaoming Wu. “The care regime in China: Elder and child care.” Journal of Comparative Social Welfare 27.2 (2011): 123–131.
- 72.
Supra note 3.
- 73.
United Nations Human Development Report, 2016.
- 74.
Supra note 45.
- 75.
Ibid.
- 76.
Ibid.
- 77.
Supra note 3 (modeled ILO estimate).
- 78.
Ibid.
- 79.
Ibid. (modeled ILO estimate).
- 80.
Jacoby, Hanan G., and Basab Dasgupta. Changing wage structure in India in the post-reform era: 1993–2011. The World Bank, 2015.
- 81.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (mention year).
- 82.
United Nations Human Development Report, 2016.
- 83.
Supra note 78.
- 84.
Dixon-Mueller, Ruth B. Rural women at work: Strategies for development in South Asia. RFF Press, 2013; “Pay Parity Sought For Women In Agriculture.” The Times of India. N.p., 2012. Web. 8 Dec. 2018.
- 85.
Ibid.
- 86.
Supra note 1.
- 87.
Akerlof, George A., and Rachel E. Kranton. “Economics and identity.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, no. 3 (2000): 715–753.
- 88.
Bjørnholt, Margunn, and Ailsa McKay. “Advances in feminist economics in times of economic crisis.” Counting on Marilyn Waring: New Advances in Feminist Economics. Canada: Demeter (2014): 7–20.
- 89.
Fineman, Martha Albertson. “The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition.” In Transcending the Boundaries of Law, pp. 177–191. Routledge-Cavendish, 2010.
- 90.
Supra note 81.
- 91.
See Balakrishnan, Radhika, ed. 2001. The Hidden Assembly Line: Gender Dynamics of Subcontracted Work in a Global Economy. Bloomfield, CN: Kumarian Press.
- 92.
Ibid.
- 93.
Cuberes, David, and Marc Teignier-Baqué. “Gender inequality and economic growth.” (2012).
- 94.
Steinberg and Nakane, supra note 1.
- 95.
Supra note 1.
- 96.
Supra note 1.
- 97.
Supra note 23.
- 98.
Greenwood, Jeremy, Ananth Seshadri, and Mehmet Yorukoglu. “Engines of liberation.” The Review of Economic Studies 72.1 (2005): 109–133.
- 99.
Doepke, Matthias, and Michele Tertilt. “Women’s Liberation: What’s in it for Men?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124.4 (2009): 1541–1591.
- 100.
Supra note 77.
- 101.
Molyneux, Maxine. “Mobilisation without emancipation? Women’s interests, the state and revolution in Nicaragua.” In Women’s Movements in International Perspective, pp. 38–59. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2001.
- 102.
Goetz, Anne Marie, and Rob Jenkins. “Feminist Activism and the Politics of Reform: When and Why Do States Respond to Demands for Gender Equality Policies?.” Development and Change 49, no. 3 (2018): 714–734.
- 103.
Chaplin, Charlie. “The Great Dictator’s Speech.” Charlie Chaplin—Official Website (2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Manivannan, S., Mohan, D. (2020). Examining China and India’s Path to a Gender- (Im)Balanced Growth: Reflections from the Post-Reform Eras. In: Kim, YC. (eds) China-India Relations. Understanding China. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44425-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44425-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44424-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44425-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)