Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Community-Driven Nature-Based Design Framework for the Regeneration of Neglected Urban Public Spaces

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design

Abstract

Nature-based solutions are a popularising concept within current urban regeneration literature, exploring differing themes in the context of optimising public spaces. Focus on the adaptation of public space design, with the community at the forefront, has been documented to a limited degree, with few studies concentrating on possible design strategies.

This literature review revealed that the majority of nature-based design frameworks, since 2017, have suggested the benefits of nature in public spaces to human health and well-being: whether physically or psychologically, and either within the full framework or as part of the framework’s scope. There are however variations in the number and clarity of steps needed to follow each framework, and it is evident that the importance of community driven designs is understated within built environment literature. Many frameworks favoured the use of academic studies as a secondary source for their creation, with few using primary analysis of community acceptance and co-creation.

This paper explores the literature available on nature-based solutions and their design frameworks. It maps out the existing studies, to date, and reports on the initial findings for this progressing PhD research. Public spaces are, in their very definition, a space for the public; despite this, development of these spaces, as well as the literature around the subject, is far more theoretical and professionally inclined, rather than community influenced. With an emphasis on sustainable development, this paper suggests that community views on nature-based public spaces need to be the focal point of design frameworks for public urban spaces, which may then be used as a protocol for the production of optimal and effective nature-based public space regeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Artmann, M., & Sartison, K. (2018). The role of urban agriculture as a nature-based solution: A review for developing a systemic assessment framework. Sustainability, 10, 1937. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank. (2016). Nature-based solutions for building resilience in towns and cities: Case studies from the Greater Mekong Region. Manila: Asian Development Bank Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, M. (2004). Co-operation with the community in property-led urban regeneration. Journal of Property Research, 21(2), 119–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bélanger, H., Cameron, S., & de la Mora, C. (2012). Revitalization of public spaces in a working class neighborhood: Appropriation identity and urban imaginary, Chapter 4. In H. Casakin & F. Bernardo (Eds.), The role of place identity in the perception, understanding, and design of built environments (pp. 47–62). Sharjah: Bentham Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeri, A., Gaspari, J., Gianfrate, V., & Longo, D. (2017). Accelerating urban transition: An approach to greening the built environment. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 223, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, A. D., & Chadwick, M. J. (1980). The restoration of land: The ecology and reclamation of derelict and degraded land. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, M. (2019). Limehouse Triangle green space lost by Tower Hamlets Council vote for building scheme next to Regent’s Canal. [Online]. Retrieved April 6, 2019 from https://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/politics/limehouse-triangle-lost-by-council-vote-for-tower-block-1-5972204

  • Buckley, R. C., & Brough, P. (2017). Economic value of parks via human mental health: An analytical framework. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5(16), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byass, R. (2010). From public garden to corporate plaza: Piccadilly Gardens and the new civic landscape. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 5(1), 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charras, K., Bébin, C., Laulier, V., Mabire, J., & Aquino, J. (2018). Designing dementia-friendly gardens: A workshop for landscape architects: Innovative practice. Dementia (London, England), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiabai, A., Quiroga, S., Martinez-Juarez, P., Higgins, S., & Taylor, T. (2018). The nexus between climate change, ecosystem services and human health: Towards a conceptual framework. Science of the Total Environment, 635, 1191–1204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, E. J., & Nicolene, D. E. (Eds.). (2016). 49th ISOCARP Congress, Brisbane, October 2014. The Hague: ISOCARP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, E. J., & Timmermans, W. (2014). The importance of creative participatory planning in the public place-making process. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(3), 413–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, M. A. (2017). A design framework for small parks in ultra-urban, metropolitan, suburban and small town settings. Journal of Urban Design, 22(1), 76–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dezio, C., & Marino, D. (2018). Towards an impact evaluation framework to measure urban resilience in food practices. Sustainability, 10, 2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, O., Lennon, M., & Scott, M. (2017). Green space benefits for health and well-being: A life-course approach for urban planning, design and management. Cities, 66, 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECDG. (2015). Towards an EU research and innovate policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities. Luxembourg: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekkel, E. D., & de Vries, S. (2017). Nearby green space and human health: Evaluating accessibility metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 214–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2017). H2020-SCC-NBS-2stage-2016. [Online]. Retrieved February 11, 2019 from https://cordis.europa.eu/projects/result_en?q=(relatedProgramme/programme/code%3D%27SCC-02-2016-2017∗%27%20OR%20relatedSubProgramme/programme/code%3D%27SCC-02-2016-2017∗%27)%20AND%20contenttype%3D%27project%27

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2015). The online manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected era. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantzeskaki, N. (2019). Seven lessons for planning nature-based solutions in cities. Environmental Science & Policy, 93, 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giusti, M., Svane, U., Raymond, C. M., & Beery, T. H. (2018). A framework to assess where and how children connect to nature. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, S. M. (2014). Occupied by design: Evaluating performative tactics for more sustainable shared city space in private-led regeneration projects. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 191, 441–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimski, D., & Ferber, U. (2001). Urban brownfields in Europe. Land Contamination and Reclamation, 9(1), 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, C., Clark, A., Katz, J., & Peace, S. (2007). Social interaction with urban spaces. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, J. B., Foster-Karim, C., & Wiley, A. (2018). Urban inclusivity through a service design framework. Journal of Place Management and Development, 12(1), 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. (2019). Nature-based solutions. Gland: Commission on Ecosystem Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova, E. (2016). Public gardening and the challenges of neighbourhood regeneration in Moscow. Critical Housing Analysis, 3(2), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, V., & Bamkole, O. (2019). The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: An avenue for health promotion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julier, G. (2005). Urban designscapes and the production of aesthetic consent. Urban Studies, 42(5–6), 869–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabisch, N., Korn, H., Stadler, J., & Bonn, A. (2017). Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas: Linkages between science, policy and practice. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, G. (2016). The public value of urban vacant land: Social responses and ecological value. Sustainability, 8(5), 486. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/5/486

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., & Kwon, H. (2018). Urban sustainability through public architecture. Sustainability, 10(4), 1249. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1249/pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Lans, W., Mulder, A., & van Rij, A. (2007). Open space and social contact. International Journal for Housing Science and Its Applications, 31(1), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, M., Douglas, O., & Scott, M. (2017). Urban green space for health and well-being: Developing an ‘affordances’ framework for planning and design. Journal of Urban Design, 22(6), 778–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy-Storms, L., Chen, L., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2018). Older adults’ needs and preferences for open space and physical activity in and near parks: A systematic review. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 26(4), 682–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS One, 12(5), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K. (2002). Street life: Youth, culture and competing uses of public space. Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (2017). Nonverbal communication. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihaylov, N., & Perkins, D. D. (2014). Community place attachment and its role in social capital development, Chapter 5. In L. C. Manzo & P. Devine-Wright (Eds.), Place attachment: Advances in theory, methods and applications (pp. 61–74). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, M., & Takara, K. (2018). Urban green space as a countermeasure to increasing urban risk and the UGS-3CC resilience framework. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 28, 854–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabarro, R., & Smart, G. (1978). High cost and low value in urban land. Built Environment, 4(3), 229–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbitt, L., Meitner, M. J., Sheppard, S. R., & Girling, C. (2018). The dimensions of urban green equity: A framework for analysis. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 34, 240–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otsuka, N., & Reeve, A. (2007). The contribution and potential of town centre management for regeneration: Shifting its focus from ‘management’ to ‘regeneration’. Town Planning Review, 78(2), 225–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pani, B. (2016). Improving the lives of people with dementia through urban design. Journal of Urban Design and Mental Health, 1, 9. Retrieved from https://www.ccities.org/improving-the-lives-of-people-with-dementia-through-urban-design/

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J., Walford, N., Hockey, A., Foreman, N., & Lewis, M. (2013). Older people and outdoor environments: Pedestrian anxieties and barriers in the use of familiar and unfamiliar spaces. Geoforum, 47, 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radoslav, R., Găman, M. S., Morar, T., Bădescu, S., Branea, A., & Ghena, C. (Eds.). (2012). Sustainable urban development through the empowering of local communities. Rijeka: InTech.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz, A. (1980). Remaking cities (Routledge revivals) (1st ed.). London: Routledge Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, C. M., Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N., Berry, P., Breil, M., Nita, M. R., … Calfapietra, C. (2017). A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environmental Science and Policy, 77, 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosol, M. (2010). Public participation in post-Fordist urban green space governance: The case of community gardens in Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(3), 548–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, A., & Cirella, G. (2018). Modern compact cities: How much greenery do we need? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), E2180. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30301177

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, A., Ignatieva, M., Cirella, G., Marchesini, L., Krestov, P., Korzhov, E., … Escobedo, F. (2017). Biophilia: Nature-based solutions for sustainable cities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salone, C., Baraldi, S. B., & Pazzola, G. (2017). Cultural production in peripheral urban spaces: Lessons from Barriera, Turin (Italy). European Planning Studies, 25(12), 2117–2137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, J. (2007). The life and death of five spaces: Public art and community regeneration in Glasgow. Cultural Geographies, 14(2), 274–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonneveld, B., Merbis, M. D., Alfarra, A., Unver, O., & Arnal, M. F. (2018). Nature-based solutions for agricultural water management and food security 12 nature-based solutions for agricultural water management and food security. Unpublished, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratigea, A., Kikidou, M., Patelida, M., & Somarakis, G. (2017). Engaging citizens in planning open public space regeneration: Pedio Agora framework. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swierad, E. M., & Huang, T. T. K. (2018). An exploration of psychosocial pathways of parks’ effects on health: A qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(8), E1693. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC. (2018). The Paris Agreement. Bonn: United Nations Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Bosch, M., & Ode Sang, Å. (2017). Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health—A systematic review of reviews. Environmental Research, 158, 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK

    Gloria Osei, Alison Pooley & Federica Pascale

Authors
  1. Gloria Osei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alison Pooley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Federica Pascale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technological University Dublin, Dunboyne, Ireland

    Lloyd Scott

  2. University of Suffolk, Ipswich, Suffolk, UK

    Mohammad Dastbaz

  3. Leeds Sustainability Institute, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK

    Christopher Gorse

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Osei, G., Pooley, A., Pascale, F. (2020). A Community-Driven Nature-Based Design Framework for the Regeneration of Neglected Urban Public Spaces. In: Scott, L., Dastbaz, M., Gorse, C. (eds) Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44381-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44381-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44380-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44381-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation