Skip to main content

Sustainable Development of Mankind Through Ecological Services: A Literature Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 670 Accesses

Abstract

A working ecosystem is a cornerstone to human prosperity. When ecological concerns are associated with the economic aspects, the challenge lies in addressing human issues without corrupting the environment. The presence of mankind and society relies upon the life support framework of the physical environment. Thus, the purpose of the study is to appraise the sustainable development of mankind through ecological services in developed and developing countries. The research relied on the use of credible past and present literature from the theoretical and conceptual analysis undertaken to form the fundamental concept which this study is formed upon. The literature revealed that the economic significance of ecological services to the sustainable development of mankind legitimizes the need to comprehend their value. Similarly, to understand the association between ecological services and the development of mankind as a component that supports policy decisions, different approaches can be implemented towards the remuneration of ecological services. These approaches are mainly through the market and governmental approach. Moreover, the study contributes to the body of knowledge on how ecological services could bring about radical sustainable development in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baylis, K., Peplow, S., Rausser, G., & Simon, L. (2006). Agri-environmental policy in the European Union: Who’s in charge? Commissioned Paper. Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network (CATPRN), 4, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, N., Fox, J., & Bayon, R. (2008). Conservation and biodiversity banking: A guide to setting up and running biodiversity credit trading systems. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costenbader, J. (2009). Legal frameworks for REDD. Design and implementation at the National Level, IUCN. Environmental Policy and Law, Paper No. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (2008). Nature in economics. Environmental and Resource Economics, 39, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, T. (2006). Working lands agri-environmental policy options and issues for the next United States Fram Bill, economic staff paper, 3. Department of Economics, South Dakota State University, 2006, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S., Pagiola, S., & Wunder, S. (2008). Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issue. Ecological Economics, 65, 663–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J., & Costanza, R. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecological Economics, 69, 2060–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B., Kulindwa, K., Mwanyoka, I., Turner, R. K., & Burgess, N. D. (2010). Common pool resource management and PES: Lessons and constraints for water PES in Tanzania. Ecological Economics, 69, 1253–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, C.S. (2014) Development of a capability maturity model for sustainable construction. HKU Theses Online (HKUTO), Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics, 69, 1209–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz, S. (2009). The evolution of Australia’s natural resource management programs: Towards improved targeting and evaluation of investments. Land Use Policy, 26(2):471–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallwood, P. (2010). Contractual difficulties in environmental management: The case of wetland mitigation banking. Ecological Economics, 63, 446–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G. (2005). Valuing ecosystem services. Ecosystems, 3(1), 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jack, B. K., Kousky, C., & Sims, K. R. E. (2008). Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 9465–9470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, W. A., Murray, B. C., Kramer, R. A., & Faulkner, S. P. (2010). Valuing ecosystem services from wetland restoration in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Ecological Economics, 69, 1051–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivati, G.N., & Onyango, J. (2015). Conventional vs. ecological economics perspectives in the valuation of ecosystem services in East Africa. African Centre for Technology Studies, paper 010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. G., Li, S. X., Ouyang, Z. Y., Tam, C., & Chen, X. D. (2008). Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 9477–9482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiteny, P., & Parker, J. (2002). Unit 6 study guide-science and culture in education for sustainability. London: Distance Learning Centre, London South Bank University, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. A., & Hammill, A. (2010). Sustainable development and climate change. International Affairs, 85(6), 1117–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2005). Ecosystems and human wellbeing: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullan, K., Kontoleon, A., Swanson, T., & Zhnag, S. Q. (2011). When should household be compensated for land-use restriction? A decision-making framework for Chinese forest policy. Land Use Policy, 28, 402–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., & May, P. H. (2010). Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69, 1202–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, F., Foley, C., Foley, L. S., Leposo, A., Loure, E., Peterson, D., … Williams, A. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services as a framework for community-based conservation in Northern Tanzania. Conservation Biology, 24, 78–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual, U., Muradian, R., Rodriguez, L. C., & Duraiappah. (2010). Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A conceptual approach. Ecological Economics, 69, 1237–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanayak, S. K., Wunder, S., & Ferraro, P. J. (2010). Show me the money: Do payments supply environmental services in developing countries? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4, 254–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schomers, S., & Matzdorf, B. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosystem Services, 6, 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swallow, B. M., Leimona, B., Yatich, T., & Velarde, S. J. (2010). The conditions for functional mechanisms of compensation and rewards for environmental services. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uthes, S., Matzdorf, B., Mueller, K., & Kaechele, H. (2010). Spatial targeting of Agri-environmental measures: Cost-effectiveness and distributional consequences. Environmental Management, 46, 494–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hecken, G., & Bastiaensen, J. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services: Justified or not? A political view. Environmental Science and Policy, 13, 785–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heide, S. H. (2013). Economic viewpoints on ecosystem services, Wageningen, Statutory Research Tasks Unit for Nature and the Environment (WOT Namur & Milieu). WOt-rapport 123, 68, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatn, A. (2010). An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69, 1245–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunder, S. (2005). Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunder, S., & Alban, M. (2008). Decentralized payments for environmental services: The cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador. Ecological Economics, 65, 685–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, Y., & Wang, K. L. (2010). Eco-compensation effects of the wetland recovery in Dongting Lake area. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20, 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanarella, E. J., Levine, R. S., & Lancaster, R. W. (2009). Research and solutions: “Green” vs. sustainability: From semantics to enlightenment. Sustainability: The Journal of Record, 2(5), 296–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ndou, M., Aigbavboa, C. (2020). Sustainable Development of Mankind Through Ecological Services: A Literature Review. In: Scott, L., Dastbaz, M., Gorse, C. (eds) Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44381-8_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44381-8_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44380-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44381-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics