Abstract
Located between two of the wealthiest neighbourhoods of Rio de Janeiro, on a surface of less than 2 km2, the Rocinha favela is considered the largest single slum in Brazil, with an unofficial population between 150,000 and 200,000 inhabitants. Its privileged position, dimension and characteristics, compared to the other circa 1000 favelas of Rio, make Rocinha a paradigmatic case of the socio-economic and environmental contradictions of the Brazilian mega-city, but a significant case study for any slum-upgrading programme. The Brazilian experience with slums upgrading is globally recognized, but it is still fragmented and needs to be improved. An overview of the main slum-upgrading policies and programmes carried out in Rio shows that the lack of appropriate participatory programmes and systemic approaches can hinder successful solutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atuesta L, Soares Y (2016) Urban Upgrading in Rio de Janeiro: Evidence from the Favela-Bairro Programme. Urban Stud 55(1):53–70
Brazilian Gov. (2017) Ministério do Planejamento. Sobre o PAC. http://pac.gov.br/sobre-o-pac. Accessed 10 Jan 2020
Burgos M (2016) Development, security and displacement: an Ethnographic case study of Rocinha and other Key Favelas in Rio de Janeiro. Dissertation, City University of New York
Cardoso AL, Rossi AMG (2010) Experiences with the urbanization of Slums: management and intervention models. In: Pina Filho AC, Pina AC (eds) Methods and techniques in urban engineering. IntechOpen, Rijeka, pp 27–42
Collucci P (2016) In Rio’s Rocinha Slum, one street shares two very different Tuberculosis experiences. In: Folha de Paulo S. http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/internacional/en/scienceandhealth/2016/11/1834121-in-rocinha-one-street-shares-two-very-different-tuberculosis-experiences.shtml. Accessed 19 April 2018
Cummings J (2013) Confronting the Favela Chic: gentrification of informal settlements in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Dissertation, Harvard University Graduate School of Design
Handzic K (2010) Is legalized land tenure necessary in slum upgrading? learning from Rio’s land tenure policies in the Favela Bairro program. Habitat Int 34(1):11–17
Instituto Lula (2017) PAC. http://www.brasildamudanca.com.br/pac/pac-0. Accessed the 19 Apr 2018
Lacerda D (2016) The production of spatial hegemony as statecraft: an attempted passive revolution in the favelas of Rio. Third World Q 37(6):1083–1101
Mahabir R, Crooks A, Croitoru A, Agouris P (2016) The study of slums as social and physical constructs: challenges and emerging research opportunities. Region Stud Region Sci 3(1):399–419
McFarlane C (2012) Rethinking informality: politics, crisis, and the city. Plan Theory Pract 13(1):89–108
MIDH (2004) Municipal human development index for Rio’s neighborhoods dataset
Miles L (2016) Rocinha—Favelas Rio de Janeiro. In: E-architect 2017. https://www.e-architect.co.uk/brazil/rocinha-favelas-rio. Accessed 19 Apr 2018
Osborn C (2012) A history of Favela upgrading part II: introducing Favela-Bairro (1988–2008). In: Rio on watch, http://www.rioonwatch.org/?p=5931. Accessed 19 Apr 2018
Pearlman J (2010) Favela: four decades of living on the edge in Rio De Janeiro. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Rekow L (2016a) On unstable ground: issues involved in greening space in the Rocinha Favela of Rio De Janeiro. J Human Sec 12(1):52–73
Rekow L (2016b) Pacification and mega-events in Rio de Janeiro: urbanization, public security, & accumulation by dispossesion. J Human Sec 12(1):4–34
Riley E, Fiori J, Ramirez R (2001) Favela Bairro and a new generation of housing programmes for the urban poor. Geoforum 32(4):521–531
Rocinha speaks (2017). https://rocinhaspeaks.wordpress.com/history/. Accessed 19 Apr 2018
Roller Z (2011) PAC growth acceleration program hits the brakes in Rocinha. In: Rio on watch. http://www.rioonwatch.org/?p=1705. Accessed the 19 Apr 2018
Smith T (2011) UPP social and participation: how not to integrate Rio. In: Rio on watch. http://www.rioonwatch.org/?p=2592. Accessed 19 Apr 2018
UN Development Indicators Unit (2015) Millennium development goals indicators. http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/default.aspx. Accessed 10 Jan 2020
UN-Habitat (2016a) World cities report 2016: urbanization and development—emerging futures. United Nations Human Settlements Programme, Nairobi
UN-Habitat (2016b) Slum Almanac 2015/2016: tracking improvement in the lives of slum dwellers. United Nations Human Settlements Programme, Nairobi
Vigna A (2016) Rio’s forgotten health crisis. In: Americas quarterly. http://www.americasquarterly.org/content/rios-forgotten-health-crisis. Accessed 19 Apr 2018
Werneck A (2017) Obras do PAC na Rocinha, Manguinhos e no Complexo do Alemão foram superfaturadas, diz TCE. In: Oglobo. https://oglobo.globo.com/rio/obras-do-pac-na-rocinha-manguinhos-no-complexo-do-alemao-foram-superfaturadas-diz-tce-20819631. Accessed 19 Apr 2018
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ceppi, P., Masera, G., Tadi, M., Rossi, A.G. (2020). The Rocinha Favela as a Paradigmatic Case Study of Informal Settlements in Large Cities: Current Situation and Past Slum-Upgrading Programmes . In: Masera, G., Tadi, M. (eds) Environmental Performance and Social Inclusion in Informal Settlements. Research for Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44352-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44352-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44351-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44352-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)