Skip to main content

A Use Case of Blockchain in Healthcare: Allergy Card

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology Use Cases

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

Abstract

Blockchain has often been mentioned in recent years as being a promising innovation for the healthcare sector in that it can ensure the secure exchange and traceability of information while respecting the regulatory framework for the confidentiality and portability of healthcare data. However, concrete cases remain very rare in the literature, and we investigate relevant use cases applying blockchain in healthcare. This chapter shows how we design a blockchain-based allergy card to solve real-life issues that is register, share and trace information about drug allergies. Therefore, we iteratively use action design research to determine the needs, design solution, develop the application and evaluate outcomes by involving stakeholders in the construction and evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agbo, C. C., Mahmoud, Q. H., & Eklund, J. M. (2019). Blockchain technology in healthcare: A systematic review. Healthcare, 7, 56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, W., & Tullis, T. (2013). Measuring the user experience: Collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics (Newnes ed.). Newnes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apter, A. J., Kinman, J. L., Bilker, W. B., Herlim, M., Margolis, D. J., Lautenbach, E., et al. (2004). Represcription of penicillin after allergic-like events. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 113(4), 764–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, D., & Tavenner, M. (2010). The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(6), 501–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockow, K., Aberer, W., Atanaskovic-Markovic, M., Bavbek, S., Bircher, A., Bilo, B., et al. (2016). Drug allergy passport and other documentation for patients with drug hypersensitivity—An ENDA/EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group Position Paper. Allergy, 71(11), 1533–1539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Correia, R., Boldt, I., Lapão, L., Santos-Pereira, C., Rodrigues, P. P., Ferreira, A. M., & Freitas, A. (2013). Analysis of the quality of hospital information systems audit trails. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(1), 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Hert, P., Papakonstantinou, V., Malgieri, G., Beslay, L., & Sanchez, I. (2018). The right to data portability in the GDPR: Towards user-centric interoperability of digital services. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demoly, P., Adkinson, N. F., Brockow, K., Castells, M., Chiriac, A. M., Greenberger, P. A., et al. (2014). International consensus on drug allergy. Allergy, 69(4), 420–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, D., Moffitt, J., Nicklas, R., Freeman, T., & Graft, D. (2011). Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI), American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI), Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Stinging insect hypersensitivity: a practice parameter update 2011. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 127(4), 852–854, e851–e823

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, E., Cardoso, M., Praca, F., Gomes, L., Marino, E., & Demoly, P. (2004). Self-reported drug allergy in a general adult Portuguese population. Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 34(10), 1597–1601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölbl, M., Kompara, M., Kamišalić, A., & Nemec Zlatolas, L. (2018). A systematic review of the use of blockchain in healthcare. Symmetry, 10(10), 470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. A., & Como, J. A. (2003). Assessment of medication errors that involved drug allergies at a university hospital. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 23(7), 855–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, H., Leversha, A., & Khalil, V. (2011). Drug allergy documentation-time for a change? International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 33(4), 610–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, T.-T., Kim, H.-E., & Ohno-Machado, L. (2017). Blockchain distributed ledger technologies for biomedical and health care applications. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(6), 1211–1220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lartigau, J., Bucamp, F., & de Casaubon, D. C. (2018). PikcioChain: A new eco-system for personal data.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesar, T. S., Briceland, L., & Stein, D. S. (1997). Factors related to errors in medication prescribing. JAMA, 277(4), 312–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, L. A., & Koo, M. B. (2016). Blockchain for health data and its potential use in health it and health care related research. Paper presented at the ONC/NIST Use of Blockchain for Healthcare and Research Workshop. Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States: ONC/NIST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matricardi, P. M., Dramburg, S., Alvarez-Perea, A., Antolín-Amérigo, D., Apfelbacher, C., Atanaskovic-Markovic, M., et al. (2019). The role of mobile health technologies in allergy care: An EAACI Position Paper. Allergy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maymounkov, P., & Mazieres, D. (2002). Kademlia: A peer-to-peer information system based on the xor metric. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omary, Z., Mtenzi, F., Wu, B., & O’Driscoll, C. (2011). Ubiquitous healthcare information system: Assessment of its impacts to patient’s information. International Journal for Information Security Research, 1(2), 71–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, A. B., Risius, M., & Beck, R. (2019). A ten-step decision path to determine when to use blockchain technologies. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabah, K. (2017). Challenges & opportunities for blockchain powered healthcare systems: A review. Mara Research Journal of Medicine & Health Sciences, 1(1), 45–52. ISSN 2523-5680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scapin, D. L., & Bastien, J. C. (1997). Ergonomic criteria for evaluating the ergonomic quality of interactive systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 16(4–5), 220–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sein, M., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sligo, J., Gauld, R., Roberts, V., & Villa, L. (2017). A literature review for large-scale health information system project planning, implementation and evaluation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 97, 86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villamañán, E., Larrubia, Y., Ruano, M., Herrero, A., & Álvarez-Sala, R. (2011). Strategies for improving documentation and reducing medication errors related to drug allergy. International journal of clinical pharmacy, 33(6), 879–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virzi, R. A. (1992). Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: How many subjects is enough? Human Factors, 34(4), 457–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wüst, K., & Gervais, A. (2018). Do you need a Blockchain? Paper presented at the Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rhode Ghislaine Nguewo Ngassam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix. Semi-Directive Interview

Appendix. Semi-Directive Interview

  1. 1.

    Context

  • What do you know about allergy card?

  • What do know about applications in healthcare? Have you ever used them? What did you think?

  • What do you think of the principle and the usefulness of Digital allergy documentation?

  1. 2.

    Ergonomics

  • What do you think about the interfaces of the application?

  • Is it simple or are there any difficulties in use? (intuitive use?).

  1. 3.

    Content

  • Are the fields to be filled understandable?

  • Are the different textual contents understandable

  • Would you like to add or remove any information?

  1. 4.

    Usage

  • Would you like to use it? Why? How?

  • Do you have anything to add?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nguewo Ngassam, R.G., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Lartigau, J., Bourdon, I. (2020). A Use Case of Blockchain in Healthcare: Allergy Card. In: Treiblmaier, H., Clohessy, T. (eds) Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology Use Cases. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44337-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics