Abstract
In this chapter, I reflect on three intellectual divides that continually challenge and motivate my scholarship. I discuss how these intellectual borders (mathematics/education; expert/novice; research/teaching) create adversarial relationships and unwarranted hierarchies in our field and among ourselves. Although these divides seem innocuous and have been with us for a long time, I contend that these are far more dangerous than we might realize. These divides prevent us, individually and collectively, from imagining new and creative solutions to the perennial question about how to improve the quality and equity of mathematics education. I propose a reflexive and collaborative approach to identifying and problematizing the intellectual divides that challenge our goals and commitments to pursuing research that makes a difference in the very communities that we seek to serve.
En este capítulo reflexiono sobre tres divisiones intelectuales que continuamente retan y motivan mi trabajo académico. Discuto cómo estas fronteras intelectuales (matemáticas/educación; expert(a)/novato(a); investigación/enseñanza) crean relaciones adversas y jerarquías injustificadas en nuestro campo y entre nosotros(as). A pesar de que estas divisiones parecen inofensivas y hace mucho tiempo que están con nosotros(as), sostengo que éstas son mucho más peligrosas de lo que podríamos darnos cuenta. Estas divisiones nos impiden individual y colectivamente imaginar soluciones nuevas y creativas a la eterna pregunta de cómo mejorar la calidad y equidad de la educación matemática. Propongo un enfoque reflexivo y colaborativo para identificar y problematizar divisiones intelectuales que desafían nuestras metas y compromisos de hacer investigación para contribuir a las comunidades que queremos servir.
This chapter is a revised version of Crespo, S. (2016). En la lucha/In the Struggle!: Researching What Makes a Difference in Mathematics Education . In M. B. Wood, E. E. Turner, M. Civil, & J. A. Eli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 2–14). Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Battista, M. T., Senk, S., Crespo, S., Frazier, M., Son, J. W., & Kim, D. J. (2007, April). Investigating preservice elementary teachers’ understanding of mathematics and students’ mathematical thinking. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Bishop, A. (1990). Western mathematics: The secret weapon of cultural imperialism. Race & Class, 32(2), 51–65.
Brakoniecki, A. (2009). Mathematical knowledge for teaching exhibited by preservice teachers responding to mathematical and pedagogical contexts. In S. L. Swars, D. W. Stinson, & S. Lemons-Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the North America Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1360–1369). Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lyttle, S. L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2–11.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lyttle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Comber, B., & Kamler, B. (2004). Getting out of deficit: Pedagogies of reconnection. Teaching Education, 15(3), 293–310.
Crespo, S. (2000). Learning mathematics while learning to teach: Mathematical insights prospective teachers experience when working with students. In M. L. Fernández (Ed.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the North American Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 549–554). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
Crespo, S. (2006). Exploring prospective teachers’ learning the practices of posing, interpreting, and responding during and beyond teacher preparation. National Science Foundation, NSF-CAREER award (Grant No 0546164).
Crespo, S. (2013, March–April). Getting smarter together about complex instruction in the mathematics classroom. Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME International) Newsletter, 4–5
Crespo, S. (2016a). Is it educative? The importance of reviewers’ feedback. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 4(2), 1–4.
Crespo, S. (2016b). Truth, lies, and videotapes: Embracing the contraries of mathematics teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 117(1), 101–118.
Crespo, S., & Featherstone, H. (2012). Counteracting the language of math ability: Preservice teachers explore the role of status in elementary classrooms. In L. J. Jacobsen, J. Mistele, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education in the public interest (pp. 159–179). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Crespo, S., Oslund, J., Brakoniecki, A., Lawrence, A., & Thorpe, J. (2009). Learning to interpret students’ mathematical work: Studying (and mapping) preservice teachers’ practices. In S. L. Swars, D. W. Stinson, & S. Lemons-Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 1134–1142). Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
Crespo, S., Oslund, J., & Parks, A. (2011). Imagining mathematics teaching practice: Prospective teachers generate representations of a class discussion. The International Journal on Mathematics Education (Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik – ZDM), 43(1), 119–131.
Crespo, S., Oslund, J. A., & Parks, A. (2007). Studying elementary preservice teachers' learning of mathematics teaching: Preliminary insights. In T. Lamberg & L. R. Wiest (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 975–982). Stateline (Lake Tahoe), NV: University of Nevada, Reno.
Davis, B. (2004). Inventions of teaching: A genealogy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum/Routledge.
Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2014). Engaging minds: Cultures of education and practices of teaching. New York: Routledge.
Elbow, P. (1983). Embracing contraries in the teaching process. College English, 45(4), 327–339.
Elbow, P. (2000). Everyone can write: Essays toward a hopeful theory of writing and teaching writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Elliott, J. (1989). Teachers as researchers: Implications for supervision and teacher education. In T. R. Carson & D. J. Summara (Eds.), Exploring collaborative action research (pp. 3–22). Jasper, Alta: Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies.
Featherstone, H., Crespo, S., Jilk, L., Oslund, J., Parks, A., & Wood, M. (2011). Smarter together: Collaboration and equity in the elementary math classroom. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education – Equity Special Issue, 44(1), 37–68.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Bartell, T. G., Breyfogle, L., Bieda, K., Crespo, S., Domínguez, H., et al. (2013). Strong is the silence: Challenging interlocking systems of privilege and oppression in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 6(1), 6–18.
Herrstein Smith, B. (2006). Scandalous knowledge: Science, truth, and the human. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
Kleinsasser, A. M. (2010). Researchers, reflexivity, and good data: Writing to unlearn. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 155–162.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Research Committee. (2016). Positioning mathematics education researchers to influence storylines. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(2), 102–117.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors on learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
Shields, C. M., Bishop, R., & Mazawi, A. E. (2005). Pathologizing practices: The impact of deficit thinking on education. New York: Peter Lang.
Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures. London: Cambridge University Press.
Stinson, D. W., & Bullock, E. C. (2012). Critical postmodern theory in mathematics education research: A praxis of uncertainty [Special issue]. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1&2), 41–55.
Watson, J. (1988). Three hungry men and strategies for problem solving. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(3), 20–27.
White, D., Crespo, S., & Civil, M. (Eds.). (2016). Cases for mathematics teacher educators: Conversations about inequities in mathematics classrooms. Charlotte, NC: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators and Information Age Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crespo, S. (2020). En La Lucha/in the Struggle for Mathematics Teacher Education Without Borders. In: Radakovic, N., Jao, L. (eds) Borders in Mathematics Pre-Service Teacher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44292-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44292-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44291-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44292-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)