Skip to main content

En La Lucha/in the Struggle for Mathematics Teacher Education Without Borders

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Borders in Mathematics Pre-Service Teacher Education
  • 321 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I reflect on three intellectual divides that continually challenge and motivate my scholarship. I discuss how these intellectual borders (mathematics/education; expert/novice; research/teaching) create adversarial relationships and unwarranted hierarchies in our field and among ourselves. Although these divides seem innocuous and have been with us for a long time, I contend that these are far more dangerous than we might realize. These divides prevent us, individually and collectively, from imagining new and creative solutions to the perennial question about how to improve the quality and equity of mathematics education. I propose a reflexive and collaborative approach to identifying and problematizing the intellectual divides that challenge our goals and commitments to pursuing research that makes a difference in the very communities that we seek to serve.

En este capítulo reflexiono sobre tres divisiones intelectuales que continuamente retan y motivan mi trabajo académico. Discuto cómo estas fronteras intelectuales (matemáticas/educación; expert(a)/novato(a); investigación/enseñanza) crean relaciones adversas y jerarquías injustificadas en nuestro campo y entre nosotros(as). A pesar de que estas divisiones parecen inofensivas y hace mucho tiempo que están con nosotros(as), sostengo que éstas son mucho más peligrosas de lo que podríamos darnos cuenta. Estas divisiones nos impiden individual y colectivamente imaginar soluciones nuevas y creativas a la eterna pregunta de cómo mejorar la calidad y equidad de la educación matemática. Propongo un enfoque reflexivo y colaborativo para identificar y problematizar divisiones intelectuales que desafían nuestras metas y compromisos de hacer investigación para contribuir a las comunidades que queremos servir.

This chapter is a revised version of Crespo, S. (2016). En la lucha/In the Struggle!: Researching What Makes a Difference in Mathematics Education . In M. B. Wood, E. E. Turner, M. Civil, & J. A. Eli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 2–14). Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battista, M. T., Senk, S., Crespo, S., Frazier, M., Son, J. W., & Kim, D. J. (2007, April). Investigating preservice elementary teachers’ understanding of mathematics and students’ mathematical thinking. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. (1990). Western mathematics: The secret weapon of cultural imperialism. Race & Class, 32(2), 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brakoniecki, A. (2009). Mathematical knowledge for teaching exhibited by preservice teachers responding to mathematical and pedagogical contexts. In S. L. Swars, D. W. Stinson, & S. Lemons-Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the North America Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1360–1369). Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lyttle, S. L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lyttle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B., & Kamler, B. (2004). Getting out of deficit: Pedagogies of reconnection. Teaching Education, 15(3), 293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, S. (2000). Learning mathematics while learning to teach: Mathematical insights prospective teachers experience when working with students. In M. L. Fernández (Ed.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the North American Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 549–554). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, S. (2006). Exploring prospective teachers’ learning the practices of posing, interpreting, and responding during and beyond teacher preparation. National Science Foundation, NSF-CAREER award (Grant No 0546164).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, S. (2013, March–April). Getting smarter together about complex instruction in the mathematics classroom. Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME International) Newsletter, 4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, S. (2016a). Is it educative? The importance of reviewers’ feedback. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 4(2), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, S. (2016b). Truth, lies, and videotapes: Embracing the contraries of mathematics teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 117(1), 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, S., & Featherstone, H. (2012). Counteracting the language of math ability: Preservice teachers explore the role of status in elementary classrooms. In L. J. Jacobsen, J. Mistele, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education in the public interest (pp. 159–179). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, S., Oslund, J., Brakoniecki, A., Lawrence, A., & Thorpe, J. (2009). Learning to interpret students’ mathematical work: Studying (and mapping) preservice teachers’ practices. In S. L. Swars, D. W. Stinson, & S. Lemons-Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 1134–1142). Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, S., Oslund, J., & Parks, A. (2011). Imagining mathematics teaching practice: Prospective teachers generate representations of a class discussion. The International Journal on Mathematics Education (Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik – ZDM), 43(1), 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, S., Oslund, J. A., & Parks, A. (2007). Studying elementary preservice teachers' learning of mathematics teaching: Preliminary insights. In T. Lamberg & L. R. Wiest (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 975–982). Stateline (Lake Tahoe), NV: University of Nevada, Reno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. (2004). Inventions of teaching: A genealogy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum/Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2014). Engaging minds: Cultures of education and practices of teaching. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, P. (1983). Embracing contraries in the teaching process. College English, 45(4), 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, P. (2000). Everyone can write: Essays toward a hopeful theory of writing and teaching writing. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (1989). Teachers as researchers: Implications for supervision and teacher education. In T. R. Carson & D. J. Summara (Eds.), Exploring collaborative action research (pp. 3–22). Jasper, Alta: Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, H., Crespo, S., Jilk, L., Oslund, J., Parks, A., & Wood, M. (2011). Smarter together: Collaboration and equity in the elementary math classroom. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education – Equity Special Issue, 44(1), 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Bartell, T. G., Breyfogle, L., Bieda, K., Crespo, S., Domínguez, H., et al. (2013). Strong is the silence: Challenging interlocking systems of privilege and oppression in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 6(1), 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrstein Smith, B. (2006). Scandalous knowledge: Science, truth, and the human. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinsasser, A. M. (2010). Researchers, reflexivity, and good data: Writing to unlearn. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Research Committee. (2016). Positioning mathematics education researchers to influence storylines. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(2), 102–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors on learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, C. M., Bishop, R., & Mazawi, A. E. (2005). Pathologizing practices: The impact of deficit thinking on education. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, D. W., & Bullock, E. C. (2012). Critical postmodern theory in mathematics education research: A praxis of uncertainty [Special issue]. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1&2), 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (1988). Three hungry men and strategies for problem solving. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(3), 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, D., Crespo, S., & Civil, M. (Eds.). (2016). Cases for mathematics teacher educators: Conversations about inequities in mathematics classrooms. Charlotte, NC: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators and Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Crespo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Crespo, S. (2020). En La Lucha/in the Struggle for Mathematics Teacher Education Without Borders. In: Radakovic, N., Jao, L. (eds) Borders in Mathematics Pre-Service Teacher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44292-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44292-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44291-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44292-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics