Advertisement

Confirmation of Hypotheses in Clinical Medical Science

Chapter
  • 92 Downloads
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 426)

Abstract

In this chapter I discuss the ways in which information is gathered and used to confirm typical hypotheses encountered in clinical medical science. I discuss three kinds of hypotheses, namely, therapeutic, etiologic, and diagnostic. Therapeutic hypotheses are those concerned with treatments or other interventions, and etiologic hypotheses are those concerned with disease causation. Diagnostic hypotheses are those considered by clinicians when making a diagnosis. Examples from the medical scientific literature are extensively used. Included are an example of a randomized clinical trial and an N of 1 study for therapeutic hypotheses, and cohort, case – control, and cross – sectional studies are used for etiologic hypotheses. Approaches to the confirmation of diagnostic hypotheses are illustrated using actual published cases with discussions of the various strategies that are employed. Some possible pitfalls that may occur in the confirmation process are briefly discussed.

References

  1. Anderson, Kristin E., Thomas M. Mack, and Debra T. Silverman. 2006. Cancer of the pancreas. In Cancer epidemiology and prevention, ed. David Schottenfeld and Joseph F. Fraumeni Jr., 3rd ed., 721–762. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berghmans, Ron, and Harry C. Schouten. 2011. Sir Karl Popper, swans, and the general practitioner. British Medical Journal 343: d5469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Casey, Jonathan D., Daniel H. Solomon, Thomas A. Gaziano, Amy Leigh Miller, and Joseph Loscalzo. 2013. A patient with migrating polyarthralgias. New England Journal of Medicine 369: 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Checkoway, Harvey, Neil E. Pearce, and Douglas J. Crawford-Brown. 1989. Research methods in occupational epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Clavel, Françoise, Ellen Benhamou, Ariane Auquier, Michèle Tarayre, and Robert Flamant. 1989. Coffee, alcohol, smoking and cancer of the pancreas: A case-control study. International Journal of Cancer 43: 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox, D.R. 1972. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34: 187–220.Google Scholar
  7. Dajani, Adnan S., Elia Ayoub, Fredrick Z. Bierman, Alan L. Bisno, Floyd W. Denny, David T. Durak, Patricia Ferrieri, et al. 1993. Guidelines for the diagnosis of rheumatic fever: Jones criteria, updated 1992. Circulation 87: 302–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daling, Janet R., and Karen J. Sherman. 1996. Cancers of the vulva and vagina. In Cancer epidemiology and prevention, ed. David Schottenfeld and Joseph F. Fraumeni Jr., 2nd ed., 1117–1129. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Doll, Richard, and A. Bradford Hill. 1950. Smoking and carcinoma of the lung. Preliminary report. British Medical Journal 221: 739–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doll, Richard, Richard Peto, Jillian Boreham, and Isabelle Sutherland. 2004. Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years’ observations on male British doctors. British Medical Journal 328: 1519–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eddy, David M., and Charles H. Clanton. 1982. The art of diagnosis. Solving the clinicopathological exercise. New England Journal of Medicine 306: 1263–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elstein, Arthur S., and Alan Schwarz. 2002. Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: Selective review of the cognitive literature. British Medical Journal 324: 729–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gill, Christopher J., Lora Sabin, and Christopher H. Schmid. 2005. Why clinicians are natural bayesians. British Medical Journal 330: 1080–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenhalgh, Trisha. 2010. How to read a paper: The basics of evidence-based medicine. 4th ed. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Gutensohn, Nancy, Frederick P. Li, Ralph E. Johnson, and Philip Cole. 1975. Hodgkin’s disease, tonsillectomy, and family size. New England Journal of Medicine 292: 22–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guyatt, Gordon, Sackett David, D. Wayne Taylor, John Chong, Robin Roberts, and Stewart Pugsley. 1986. Determining optimal therapy – Randomized trials in individual patients. New England Journal of Medicine 314: 889–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harvey, A. McGehee. 1994. Foreword. In Differential diagnosis, ed. Jeremiah A. Barondess, Charles C.J. Carpenter, and A. McGehee Harvey. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.Google Scholar
  18. Herbst, Arthur L., Howard Ulfelder, and David Poskanzer. 1971. Adenocarcinoma of the vagina. Association of maternal stilbestrol therapy with tumor appearance in young women. New England Journal of Medicine 284: 878–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoen, Bruno, Isabelle Béguinot, Christian Rabaud, Roland Jaussaud, Christine Selton-Suty, Thierry May, and Philippe Canton. 1996. The Duke criteria for diagnosing infective endocarditis are specific: Analysis of 100 patients with acute fever or fever of unknown origin. Clinical Infectious Diseases 23: 298–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hosmer, David W., and Stanley Lemeshow. 1989. Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2004. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking, IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Vol. 83. Lyon: IARC.Google Scholar
  22. Jain, Bimal. 2017. The scientific nature of diagnosis. Diagnosis 4: 17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones, T. Duckett. 1944. The diagnosis of rheumatic fever. Journal of the American Medical Association 126: 481–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaplan, E.L., and Paul Meier. 1958. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53: 457–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kassirer, Jerome P., John B. Wong, and Richard I. Kopelman. 2010. Learning clinical reasoning. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  26. Kelsey, Jennifer L., W. Douglas Thompson, and Alfred S. Evans. 1986. Methods in observational epidemiology. Volume 10 of monographs in epidemiology and biostatistics, General ed. Abraham M. Lilienfeld. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Li, Jennifer S., Daniel J. Sexton, Nathan Mick, Richard Nettles, Vance G. Fowler Jr., Thomas Ryan, Thomas Bashore, and G. Ralph Corey. 2000. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 30: 633–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacMahon, Brian, Stella Yen, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Kenneth Warren, and George Nardi. 1981. Coffee and cancer of the pancreas. New England Journal of Medicine 304: 630–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mantel, Nathan, and William Haenszel. 1959. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 22: 719–748.Google Scholar
  30. Mayo, Deborah G. 1996. Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miettinen, Olli S. 2001a. The modern scientific physician: 2. Medical science versus scientific medicine. Canadian Medical Association Journal 165: 591–592.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 2001b. The modern scientific physician: 3. Scientific diagnosis. Canadian Medical Association Journal 165: 781–782.Google Scholar
  33. Morris, J.N., J.A. Heady, P.A.B. Raffle, C.G. Roberts, and J.W. Parks. 1953. Coronary heart-disease and physical activity of work. Lancet 2: 1053–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mueller, Nancy E. 1996. Hodgkin’s disease. In Cancer epidemiology and prevention, ed. David Schottenfeld and Joseph F. Fraumeni Jr., 2nd ed., 893–919. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Mueller, Nancy, G. Marie Swanson, Chung-cheng Hsieh, and Philip Cole. 1987. Tonsillectomy and Hodgkin’s disease: Results from companion population-based studies. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 78: 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rothman, Kenneth J., Sander Greenland, and Timothy L. Lash. 2008. Case-control studies. In Modern epidemiology, ed. Kenneth J. Rothman, Sander Greenland, and Timothy L. Lash, 3rd ed., 111–127. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  37. Slone, Dennis, Samuel Shapiro, Lynn Rosenberg, David W. Kaufman, Stuart C. Hartz, Allen C. Rossi, Paul D. Stolley, and Olli S. Miettinen. 1978. Relation of cigarette smoking to myocardial infarction in young women. New England Journal of Medicine 298: 1273–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sox, Harold C., Marshall A. Blott, Michael C. Higgins, and Keith I. Martin. 2007. Medical decision making. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians.Google Scholar
  39. Straus, Sharon E., Glasziou Paul, W. Scott Richardson, and R. Brian Haynes. 2011. Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach it. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
  40. Thomas, Patrick R.M., and Anne S. Lindblad. 1988. Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy in rectal carcinoma: A review of the gastrointestinal tumor study group experience. Radiotherapy and Oncology 13: 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ueshima, Hirotsugu, Takashi Shimamoto, Minoru Iida, Masamitsu Konishi, Masato Tanigaki, Mitsunori Doi, Katsuhiko Tsujioka, et al. 1984. Alcohol intake and hypertension among urban and rural Japanese populations. Journal of Chronic Diseases 37: 585–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Willis, Brian H., Helen Beebee, and Daniel S. Lasserson. 2013. Philosophy of science and the diagnostic process. Family Practice 30: 501–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wynder, Ernest L., and Evarts A. Graham. 1950. Tobacco smoking as a possible etiologic factor in bronchiogenic carcinoma. Journal of the American Medical Association 143: 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Birmingham Radiological GroupBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations