Skip to main content

Europe’s Democratic Deficit and Democratic Surplus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Referendums Challenge European Democracy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

  • 565 Accesses

Abstract

The European Union’s founders learned about politics in the late nineteenth century, long before democracy became the touchstone for legitimacy. They relied on the traditional authority of the state to negotiate agreements with other countries. Robert Schuman, Konrad Adenauer and Alcide de Gaspari saw themselves as trustees of the common interests of Europeans. European institutions were launched for the people, not by the people. Reliance on traditional authority meant that elites saw no need for extensive public debate or a referendum to justify national governments signing the treaties that created European institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blockmans, S., and S. Rusack (eds.). 2019. Direct Democracy in the EU: The Myth of a Citizens’ Union. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brack, N. 2019. Eurosceptic Parties at the 2019 Election: A Relative Success. In Euroflections, ed. N. Bolin, K. Falasca, M. Grusell, and L. Nord, 64–65. Sundsvall, Sweden: Mittunivesiteter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiglione, D., J. Schönlau, C. Longman, E. Lombardo, N.P.-S. Borragan, and M. Aziz. 2007. Constitutional Politics of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, T. 2016. After the Spitzenkandidaten: Fundamental Change in the EU’s Political System? West European Politics 39 (5): 992–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, A. 2018. How to Govern Europe Better: Reflections on Reform of the European Parliament, Commission and Council. European Policy Centre Discussion Paper, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fella, S., E. Uberoi, and R. Cracknell. 2019. European Parliament Elections 2019. House of Commons Library Briefing Paper 8600, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follesdaal, A., and S. Hix. 2006. Why There Is a Democratic Deficit in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (3): 533–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M.N., and J. Nielsen. 2017. The 2014 Elections as a Lens on Euroscepticism. In The Eurosceptic European Parliament Elections 2014, ed. J. Nielsen and M.N. Franklin, 239–254. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, E.B. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950–1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, M. 2008. European Integration as an Elite Process. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, K., R. Carlin, L. Littvay, and C.R. Kaltwasser (eds.). 2019. The Ideational Approach to Populism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H., J. Peterson, M.W. Bauer, S. Connolly, R. Dehousse, L. Hooghe, and A. Thompson. 2013. The European Commission of the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leuffen, D., B. Rittberger, and F. Schimmelfennig. 2013. Differentiated Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, Leon, and Stuart Scheingold. 1970. Europe’s Would Be Polity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnet, J. 1978. Memoirs. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. 2002. Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (4): 603–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, A., and P. C. Schmitter. 2009. Neofunctionalism. In European Integration Theory, ed. A. Wiener and T. Diez, 2nd ed., 45–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppermann, K. 2013. The Politics of Discretionary Government Commitments to European Integration Referendums. Journal of European Public Policy 20 (5): 694–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooduijn, M. 2019. How to Study Populism and Adjacent Topics. European Journal for Political Research 58 (1): 362–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. 2012. Representation in Parliamentary Democracies. In Multilayered Representation in the European Union, ed. T. Evas, U. Liebert, and C. Lord, 73–90. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. 2014. Responsible Party Government in a World of Interdependence. West European Politics 37 (2): 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. 2015. Representing Europeans: A Pragmatic Approach, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. 2019. Referendum Challenges to the EU’s Policy Legitimacy—And How the EU Responds. Journal of European Public Policy 26 (2): 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R., and G. Borz. 2016. Static and Dynamic Views of European Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (2): 370–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. 2009. Legitimacy in the Multilevel European Polity. European Political Science Review 1 (2): 173–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R. 2012. Resolving Controversy in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rose, R. (2020). Europe’s Democratic Deficit and Democratic Surplus. In: How Referendums Challenge European Democracy . Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44117-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics