Skip to main content

World Population Explosion, Migration and Solidarity in Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

World population growth has often been portrayed as a demographic “time bomb” threatening solidarity in Europe because of the combination of young and rapidly growing populations in the South and ageing and potentially shrinking populations in Europe. I argue that the “time bomb” metaphor is misleading and unproductive. I review what we know about migration from Africa to Europe. Next, I discuss how and why policy responses to immigration in Europe have been inconsistent and ineffective, as they are misguided by a combination of Malthusian fears and the framing of migration as a matter of solidarity. Europe should open up new channels of orderly migration, including labour migration. While anti-immigration sentiments are widespread, there also exist important manifestations of positive attitudes, particularly among younger generations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abel, G. J., & Sander, N. (2014). Quantifying global international migration flows. Science, 343(6178), 1520–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. H. (2003, June). International migration, remittances, and the brain drain (Policy Research Working Paper, pp. 1–36). Washington, DC: World Bank Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, T. (2015). Immigration policy and electoral competition in Western Europe: A fine-grained analysis of party positions over the past two decades. Party Politics, 21(1), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansak, K., Hainmueller, J., & Hangartner, D. (2016). How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers. Science, 354(6309), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansak, K., Hainmueller, J., & Hangartner, D. (2017). Europeans support a proportional allocation of asylum seekers. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(7), 133. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauböck, R. (2018). Refugee protection and burden-sharing in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleich, E., Bloemraad, I., & De Graauw, E. (2015). Migrants, minorities and the media: Information, representations and participation in the public sphere. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(6), 857–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D. (2011, July). 7 billion and counting. Science, 333, 562–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommes, M., & Geddes, A. (Eds.). (2000). Immigration and welfare: Challenging the borders of the welfare state. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brekke, J. P., & Brochmann, G. (2015). Stuck in transit: Secondary migration of asylum seekers in Europe, national differences, and the Dublin regulation. Journal of Refugee Studies, 28(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feu028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J. (2008). The problem of religion and the anxieties of European secular democracy. In G. Motzkin & Y. Fischer (Eds.), Religion and democracy in contemporary Europe (pp. 63–74). London: Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caviedes, A. (2015). An emerging “European” news portrayal of immigration? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(6), 897–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, M. A., Özden, Ç., & Rapoport, H. (2015). Migration and development research is moving far beyond remittances. World Development, 65, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (2013). Exodus: How migration is changing our world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, W. A. (2001). Death at the border: Efficacy and unintended consequences of US immigration control policy. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 661–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czaika, M., & De Haas, H. (2014). The globalization of migration: Has the world become more migratory? International Migration Review, 48(2), 283–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czaika, M., & De Haas, H. (2016). The effect of visas on migration processes. International Migration Review (Fall), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12261.

  • De Haas, H. (2005). International migration, remittances and development: Myths and facts. Third World Quarterly, 26(8), 1269–1284. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500336757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haas, H. (2010). Migration and development: A theoretical perspective. International Migration Review, 44(1), 227–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00804.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haas, H., Natter, K., & Vezzoli, S. (2016). Growing restrictiveness or changing selection? The nature and evolution of migration policies. International Migration Review (Fall), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12288.

  • della Porta, D. (Ed.). (2018). Solidarity mobilizations in the ‘refugee crisis’. contentious moves. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dines, N., Montagna, N., & Vacchelli, E. (2018). Beyond crisis talk: Interrogating migration and crises in Europe. Sociology, 52(3), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518767372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2017, November). Relocation: EU solidarity between member states. Brussels: EU. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/20171114_relocation_eu_solidarity_between_member_states_en.pdf.

  • Fargues, P. (2017). Four decades of cross-mediterranean undocumented migration to Europe: A review of the evidence. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organisation for Migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, A. M., Picot, G., & Riddell, W. C. (2014). New directions in immigration policy: Canada’s evolving approach to the selection of economic immigrants. International Migration Review, 48(3), 846–867. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flahaux, M.-L., & De Haas, H. (2016). African migration: Trends, patterns, drivers. Comparative Migration Studies, 4(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-015-0015-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foner, N., & Alba, R. (2008). Immigrant religion in the U.S. and Western Europe: Bridge or barrier to inclusion? International Migration Review, 42(2), 360–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frelak, J. S. (2017). Solidarity in European migration policy: The perspective of the Visegrád States. In Solidarity in the European Union: A fundamental value in crisis (pp. 81–96). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galle, J., & Fleischmann, F. (2019). Ethnic minorities’ support for redistribution: The role of national and ethnic identity. Journal of European Social Policy, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928719840580.

  • Gerhards, J., Lengfeld, H., Ignácz, Z. S., Kley, F. K., & Priem, M. (2018). How strong is European solidarity (Berlin Studies on the Sociology of Europe No. 37). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Soziologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerland, P., Raftery, A. E., Ševčíková, H., Li, N., Gu, D., Spoorenberg, T., … Wilmoth, J. (2014). World population stabilization unlikely this century. Science, 234(6206), 234–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. A. (2010). The new population bomb: The four megatrends that will change the world. Foreign Affairs, 31(1), 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guild, E., Basaran, T., & Allinson, K. (2019). From zero to hero? An analysis of the human rights protections within the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM). International Migration (Special Issue, Early View), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12609.

  • Hatton, T. J. (2017). Public opinion on immigration in Europe: Preference versus salience (IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 10838, pp. 1–28).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickx, K., & Van Hoyweghen, I. (2018). Solidarity after nature: From biopolitics to cosmopolitics. Health, 2018, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459318800149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollifield, J. F., Martin, P. L., & Orrenius, P. M. (2014). The dilemmas of immigration control. In J. F. Hollifield, P. L. Martin, & P. M. Orrenius (Eds.), Controlling immigration: A global perspective (pp. 3–34). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsti, K. (2008). Hope and despair: Representation of Europe and Africa in news coverage of “migration crisis”. Communication Studies, 3, 125–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. (2003). The demographic transition: Three centuries of fundamental change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 167–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, K. (2013). When refugees stopped being migrants: Movement, labour and humanitarian protection. Migration Studies, 1(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mns001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucassen, L. (2017). “Peeling an onion: The ‘refugee Crisis’ from a Historical Perspective.” Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1355975.

  • Lundren, A. S., & Ljuslinder, K. (2011). ‘The baby-boom is over and the ageing shock awaits’: Populist media imagery in news-press representations of population ageing. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 6(2), 39–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W., O’Neill, B. C., & Scherbov, S. (2003, March). Europe’s population at a turning point. Science, 299, 1991–1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayda, A. M. (2010). International migration: A panel data analysis of the determinants of bilateral flows. Journal of Population Economics, 23(4), 1249–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, J. (2019). Introductory note to global compact for safe, orderly and regular migration. International Legal Materials, 58(1), 160–194. https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2019.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mepschen, P. (2019). A discourse of displacement: Super-diversity, urban citizenship, and the politics of autochthony in Amsterdam. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meuleman, B., Abts, K., Slootmaeckers, K., & Meeusen, C. (2018). Differentiated threat and the genesis of prejudice: Group-specific antecedents of homonegativity, islamophobia, anti-semitism, and anti-immigrant attitudes. Social Problems, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spy002.

  • Meuleman, B., Davidov, E., & Billiet, J. (2009). Changing attitudes toward immigration in Europe, 2002–2007: A dynamic group conflict theory approach. Social Science Research, 38(2), 352–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Lax, V. (2008). Must EU Borders have doors for refugees? On the compatibility of Schengen Visas and carriers’ sanctions with EU member states’ obligations to provide international protection to refugees. European Journal of Migration and Law, 10(3), 315–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014, May). Is migration good for the economy? (Migration Policy Debates, No. 1–4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Okkerse, L. (2008). How to measure labour market effects of immigration: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterlynck, S., Loopmans, M., Schuermans, N., Vandenabeele, J., & Zemni, S. (2016). Putting flesh to the bone: Looking for solidarity in diversity, here and now. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(5), 764–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1080380.

  • Saeed, A. (2007). Media, racism and islamophobia: The representation of Islam and Muslims in the media. Sociololgy Compass, 1(2), 443–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. L. (2008). Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: Outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 24(1), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, S. J. (2008). Political solidarity. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotte, S., & Winkler, H. (2018). Why are the elderly more averse to immigration when they are more likely to benefit? Evidence across countries. International Migration Review, 52(4), 1250–1282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918318767927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semyonov, M., Raijman, R., & Gorodzeisky, A. (2006). The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment in European societies, 1988–2000. American Sociological Review, 24(1), 426–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhilper, E., & Gruijters, R. J. (2018). A contested crisis: Policy narratives and empirical evidence on border deaths in the mediterranean. Sociology, 52(3), 515–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNHCR. (2017). Statistical yearbook 2015. Geneva: UNHCR.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Population Division. (2000). Replacement migration: Is it a solution to declining and ageing populations? New York: UN, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Population Division. (2017). World population prospects: The 2017 revision, key findings and advance tables. New York: UN, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bavel, J. (2013). The world population explosion: Causes, backgrounds and projections for the future. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 5(4), 281–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oorschot, W. (2008). Solidarity towards immigrants in European welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2007.00487.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2019). Talking around super-diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(1), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voas, D., & Fleischmann, F. (2012). Islam moves West: Religious change in the first and second generations. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 525–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2017). “Strangers in Europe” A discourse-historical approach to the legitimation of immigration control 2015/16. In S. Zhao, E. Djonov, A. Björkvall, & M. Boeriis (Eds.), Advancing multimodal and critical discourse studies interdisciplinary research inspired by Theo Van Leeuwen’s social semiotics (pp. 31–50). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Van Bavel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Van Bavel, J. (2020). World Population Explosion, Migration and Solidarity in Europe. In: Van Hoyweghen, I., Pulignano, V., Meyers, G. (eds) Shifting Solidarities . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44062-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44062-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44061-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44062-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics