Part of the Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse book series (PSDS)


This chapter introduces the framework of Ecolinguistics, which is employed in the book to bring together two fields that have rarely met before in academic literature: Cycling Mobility and Critical Discourse Studies (CDS). The ecosophy—or ecological philosophy—encompassing the analytical approach is outlined and explained, showing the centrality of life and the need to celebrate, respect and value all living beings. The chapter provides an overview of the sources of inspiration for the book and briefly explains the notions of Systems Thinking, Framing and Marketisation. The reasons for choosing cycling mobility as an object of investigation are introduced. The final part of this chapter describes the contents of the rest of the book and provides a brief summary of each chapter.


Ecosophy Well-being Systems thinking Framing Marketisation 


  1. Aldred R. (2012a). Cycling Cultures: Summary of Key Findings and Recommendations. Accessed 2 June 2019.
  2. Aldred, R. (2012b). Cycling Cultures in a Mass Motorised Society [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], September 2014. SN: 7545.
  3. Aldred, R. (2015). A Matter of Utility? Rationalising Cycling, Cycling Rationalities. Mobilities, 10(5), 686–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angermuller, J. (2018). Truth After Post-truth: For a Strong Programme in Discourse Studies. Palgrave Communications, 4(30), 1–8.Google Scholar
  5. Buchanan C. (1963–2015) Traffic in Towns—A Study of the Long Term Problem of Traffic in Urban Areas. Introduction by Simon Gunn. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Cox, P., & Van De Walle, F. (2007). Bicycles Don’t Evolve: Velomobiles and the Modelling of Transport Technologies. In D. Horton, P. Rosen, & P. Cox (Eds.), Cycling and Society (pp. 113–132). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. ECF. (2017). EU Cycling Strategy: Recommendations for Delivering Green Growth. Accessed 10 June 2019.
  8. EU. (2018). Graz Declaration. Accessed 10 June 2019.
  9. Furness, Z. (2010). One Less Car: Bicycling and the Politics of Automobility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gonella, F., Almeida, C. M. V. B., Fiorentino, G., Handayani, K., Spano, F., Testoni, R., & Zucaro, A. (2019). Is Technology Optimism Justified? A Discussion Towards a Comprehensive Narrative. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 456–465.Google Scholar
  11. Halliday, M. A. K. (2001). New Ways of Meaning: The Challenge to Applied Linguistics. In A. Fill & P. Mühlhäusler (Eds.), The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment (pp. 175–202). London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Kahlmeier, S., Racioppi, F., Cavill, N., Rutter, H., & Oja, P. (2010). “Health in All Policies” in Practice: Guidance and Tools to Quantifying the Health Effects of Cycling and Walking. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 7(1), 120–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lakoff, G. (2010). Why It Matters How We Frame the Environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mautner, G. (2010). Language and the Market Society: Critical Reflections on Discourse and Dominance. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Diana Wright (Ed.). White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Meadows, D. H. (2019). Dancing with Systems. The Donella Meadows Project: Academy for Systems Change. Accessed 8 November 2019.
  17. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W., III. (1972). The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  18. Norton, P. D. (2007). Street Rivals: Jaywalking and the Invention of the Motor Age Street. Technology and Culture, 48(2), 331–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2017). Cycling Towards a More Sustainable Transport Future. Transport Reviews, 37(6), 689–694.Google Scholar
  20. Purcell, M. (2016). Our New Arms. In S. Springer, K. Birch, & J. MacLeavy (Eds.), The Handbook of Neoliberalism (pp. 613–620). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. SOG. (2016). Sustainable Urban Transportation: Creating Green Liveable Cities. Accessed 10 June 2019.
  22. Sterman, J. D. (2012). Sustaining Sustainability: Creating a Systems Science in a Fragmented Academy and Polarized World. In M. P. Weinstein & R. E. Turner (Eds.), Sustainability Science: The Emerging Paradigm and the Urban Environment. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Stibbe, A. (2014). An Ecolinguistic Approach to Critical Discourse Studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 11(1), 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and Stories We Live by. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Impossible “Sustainability” and the Postpolitical Condition. In R. Krueger & D. Gibbs (Eds.), The Sustainable Development Paradox: Urban Political Economy in the United States and Europe. New York and London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Urry, J. (2004). The ‘System’ of Automobility. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4–5), 25–39.Google Scholar
  27. van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Discourse and the Denial of Racism. Discourse and Society, 3, 87–118.Google Scholar
  28. Wild, K., Woodward, A., Field, A., & Macmillan, A. (2018). Beyond ‘Bikelash’: Engaging with Community Opposition to Cycle Lanes. Mobilities, 13(4), 505–519.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Culture, Politics and SocietyUniversity of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations