Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of assistive technologies to support a tactile engagement in printed textiles that is accessible and equitable for all textile students and designers. The paper proposes that all textile students and designers require opportunities of access to tacit engagement and material sensibilities in printed textiles through equipping designer makers with relevant assistive devices for use in small-scale studio and workshop settings. This study reviews the literature and utilises a case study approach to address the issues that arise when a disabled design student puts into practice their learning in the textile print specialism. Through this it is demonstrated that as active players in society, disabled textile designers require equality of choice of both physical and digital processes, without predetermined perceptions leading to an assumptive use of one technology over the other. In response to debates concerning equity and equality and the impact of choice in society, the present study aims to share an individual’s experiences and insights into the importance and relevance of practical and creative engagement in materials and processes in the print workshop while being disabled.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ali S, Al Balushi T, Al-Badi A (2013) Conceptualization approach for accessibility-aware framework. Commun IBIMA. Article ID 477923
Beasties T (2019) Useful/beautiful: why craft matters exhibition at Harewood House. www.timorousbeasties.com/project/usefulbeautiful-why-craft-matters-exhibition-at-harewood-house/. Accessed 17 Dec 2019
Bristow G, Farrington J, Shaw J, Richardson T (2009) Developing an evaluation for crosscutting policy goals: the accessibility policy assessment tool. Environ Plan A 41(1):48–62
Crafts Council (2016) Crafting professional practice through higher education. A collaborative PhD between King’s College London and Crafts Council UK. www.craftscouncil.org.uk/articles/crafting-professional-practice-through-higher-education. Accessed 17 Dec 2019
Disabled World (2019) Disabled world – disability news and information. www.disabled-world.com. Accessed 17 Dec 2019
Dissanayake E (2000) Art and intimacy: how the arts began. University of Washington Press, McLellan Book, Seattle
Equality Act (2010) Equality Act 2010. UK Public General Acts. www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents. Accessed 17 Dec 2019
Hansen R (2019) Rick Hansen Foundation. www.facebook.com/rickhansenfdn/posts/10155886927171470. Accessed 17 Dec 2019
Jefferies J (2017) Introduction: back to the future. TEXTILE Cloth Cult 16(1):2–7
Lavieri P, Dai Q, Bhat C (2018) Using virtual accessibility and physical accessibility as joint predictors of activity-travel behavior. Transp Res Part A 118:527–544
Lupton D, Seymour W (2000) Technology, selfhood and physical disability. Soc Sci Med 50(12):1851–1862
Lynch G (2013) Repositioning craft education and training to reconnect artisans to designers. APT Bull J Preserv Technol 44(2/3):3–13
Marshall R, Cook S, Mitchell V, Summerskill S, Haines V et al (2015) Design and evaluation: end users, user datasets and personas. Appl Ergon 46(Part B):311–317
Magee W (2014) Effects of gender and age on pride in work, and job satisfaction. J Happiness Stud 16(5):1091–1115
Newell AF, Carmichael A, Morgan M, Dickinson A (2006) The use of theatre in requirements gathering and usability studies. Interact Comput 18(5):996–1011
Perry M (2011) Pulled: a catalog of screen printing. Princeton Architectural Press, Hudson
Riley B, Rimmer J, Wang E, Schiller W (2008) A conceptual framework for improving the accessibility of fitness and recreation facilities for people with disabilities. J Phys Act Health 5(1):158–168
Robertson K, Vinebaum L (2016) Crafting community. TEXTILE Cloth Cult 14(1):2–13
Straatemeier T, Bertolini L (2008) Joint accessibility design framework developed with practitioners to integrate land use and transport planning in the Netherlands. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2077(1):1–8
Sun A (2014) Equality is not enough: what the classroom has taught me about justice. Mag Everyday Feminism. everydayfeminism.com/2014/09/equality-is-not-enough/. Accessed 17 Dec 2019
Treadaway C (2015) Digital crafting and crafting the digital. Des J 10(2):35–48
Treadaway C (2016) Crafting textiles in the digital age: printed textiles. In: Nimkulrat N et al (eds) Crafting in the digital age. Bloomsbury, London
The University of Huddersfield (2016) Equal opportunities and diversity policy. www.hud.ac.uk/media/policydocuments/Equal-Opportunities-And-Diversity-Policy.pdf. Accessed 17 Dec 2019
V&A (2011) Power of making. www.vam.ac.uk/content/articles/p/powerofmaking/. Accessed 17 Dec 2019
Williamson J (2017) UK textile industry sees production boom in 2017. The Manufacturer. Posted on 21 Dec 2017. www.themanufacturer.com/articles/uk-textile-industry-sees-production-boom-in-2017/. Accessed 17 Dec 2019
Zitkus E, Langdon P, Clarkson PJ (2018) Gradually including potential users: a tool to counter design exclusions. Appl Ergon 66:105–120
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Smyth, M., Barber, C., Zitkus, E. (2020). Accessibility of Tactile Experience for the Textile Designer. In: Langdon, P., Lazar, J., Heylighen, A., Dong, H. (eds) Designing for Inclusion. CWUAAT 2020. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43865-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43865-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43864-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43865-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)