Abstract
While much of the discussion on digital accessibility focuses on web accessibility, accessibility of PDF files is an ongoing but frequently overlooked challenge. The guidelines for PDF accessibility, known as PDF Universal Accessibility (PDF U/A or the Matterhorn Protocol), are nowhere near as well known as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). One of the greatest challenges is the insufficient level of tools to assist content creators. In a previous research paper was published in January 2020 (Jembu Rajkumar et al. 2020), our team used surveys, usability testing and interviews, to understand the challenges that content creators in STEM fields face in making PDF files accessible. In this paper, we propose next steps in tool development for improving PDF accessibility in the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bigham J, Brady E, Gleason C, Guo A, Shamma D (2016) An uninteresting tour through why our research papers aren’t accessible. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, US, 7–12 May 2016
Brady E, Zhong Y, Bigham J (2015) Creating accessible PDFs for conference proceedings. In: Proceedings of the 12th web for all conference, Florence, Italy, 18–20 May 2015
Itext (2019) Do you know how many PDF documents exist in the world? itextpdf.com/en/blog/technical-notes/do-you-know-how-many-pdf-documents-exist-world. Accessed 15 Oct 2019
Jembukumar A, Lazar J, Jordan JB, Hutter H, Darvishy A (2020) PDF accessibility of research papers: what tools are needed for assessment and remediation? In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp 4185–4194
Lazar J, Allen A, Kleinman J, Malarkey C (2007) What frustrates screen reader users on the web: a study of 100 blind users. Int J Hum Comput Interact 22(3):247–269
Lazar J, Churchill E, Grossman T, Van der Veer G, Palanque P et al (2017) Making the field of computing more inclusive. Commun ACM 60(3):50–59
Nganji J (2015) The portable document format (PDF) accessibility practice of four journal publishers. Libr Inf Sci Res 37(3):254–262
Tomlinson SM (2016) Perceptions of accessibility and usability by blind or visually impaired persons: a pilot study. In: Proceedings of the 79th ASIS&T annual conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 14–18 October 2016
WHO (2018) Vision impairment and blindness. World Health Organization. www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment. Accessed 17 Dec 2019
Acknowledgements
The work reported in this publication was supported, in part, by grant number 90RE5027 (Universal Interface & Information Technology Access RERC) and 90REGE0008 (Inclusive ICT Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center), from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Administration for Community Living, Department of Health and Human Services. Grantees undertaking projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their findings and conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily represent official policy of the Federal government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jembu Rajkumar, A., Jordan, J.B., Lazar, J. (2020). Improving PDF Accessibility Tools for Content Developers: Looking Towards the Future. In: Langdon, P., Lazar, J., Heylighen, A., Dong, H. (eds) Designing for Inclusion. CWUAAT 2020. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43865-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43865-4_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43864-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43865-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)