Skip to main content

Creating a Space for “Lowbrow” Information Behavior: From Dime Novels to Online Communities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Digital Communities (iConference 2020)

Abstract

Both information behavior and social informatics research concern themselves with the formation and evolution of digital communities and online environments. However, literature to date focuses heavily on formal, professionalized, and normative resources and contexts at the expense of other materials and environments, including those centered around “entertaining” content such as fiction. In this paper, we present a historical narrative centered on paperback fiction and its creation, then relate that narrative to other fiction formats and current online fiction collectives, such as fanfiction archives. We adopt the perspective that fiction—often denigrated as “lowbrow” material, especially within an information science scholarly canon—can and should be considered an information resource in order to broaden social informatics and information behavior work so that they move away from normative conceptions of information and its interactors. We conclude with promising theoretical and practical directions to continue this work in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Reynolds, the educated classes (in his words, a “small minority”) in the United States in the 1890s were reading highbrow fiction in such as Stephen Crane’s Red Badge of Courage and Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray – these pieces appeared in highbrow serials such as Harper’s Magazine and Lippincott’s Magazine. Other “serious” magazines included The Century, The Nation, The Arena, and The Atlantic.

  2. 2.

    Of the detective fiction analyzed by Bedore from the 19th century, 96% of the detectives were men, as well as 85% of the criminals. A very small number of non-white characters appeared, with only 4 in the role of the detective (out of 165), 18 as criminals (out of 447), 10 as victims (out of 255). An additional 5 had roles as informants and 8 were in secondary roles.

  3. 3.

    The original genres/sub-genres associated with dime novels and early mass-market paperbacks included Westerns, detective fiction/crime drama, romance novels, and stories for boys.

  4. 4.

    For example, advances in lithographic printing and wire racks.

References

  1. Lauter, P.: Transforming a literary canon. Trans.: J. Incl. Scholarsh. Pedag. 26(1), 31–33 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jagose, A.: Queer Theory: An Introduction. NYU Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas, E.: The Dark Fantastic: Race and the Imagination from Harry Potter to the Hunger Games. NYU Press, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bourdieu, P.: Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Radway, J.A.: Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Floegel, D., Costello, K.L.: Entertainment media and the information practices of queer individuals. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 41(1), 31–38 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Case, D.O., Given, L.M.: Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior, 4th edn. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Henrich, J., Heine, S.J., Norenzayan, A.: The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 61–135 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fiesler, C., Morrison, S., Bruckman, A.S.: An archive of their own: a case study of feminist HCI and values in design. In: CHI 2016 Proceedings. ACM, New York (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858409

  10. Pecoskie, J., Hill, L.: Beyond traditional publishing models: an examination of the relationships between authors, readers, and publishers. J. Doc. 71(3), 609–626 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gray, J.: Television Entertainment. Routledge, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kling, R.: What is social informatics and why does it matter? Inf. Soc. 23(4), 205–220 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanfillipo, M., Finchman, P.: The evolution of social informatics research (1984–2013): challenges and opportunities. In: Finchman, P., Hosenbaum, H. (eds.) Social Informatics: Past, Present, and Future, pp. 29–55. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reynolds, Q.J.: The Fiction Factory: Or From Pulp Row to Quality Street: The Story of 100 Years of Publishing at Street & Smith. Random House, New York (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bedore, P.: Dime Novels and the Roots of American Detective Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Sullivan, L.E., Schurman, L.C.: Pioneers, Passionate Ladies, and Private Eyes: Dime Novels, Series Books, and Paperbacks. The Hawthorne Press, Binghamton (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bauer, H., Cook, M. (eds.): Queer 1950s: Rethinking Sexuality in the Postwar Years. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hemmer, K.: Encyclopedia of Beat Literature. Infobase Publishing, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. City Lights Bookstore. http://www.citylights.com/

  20. Hill, M.: Toni Morrison and the post-civil rights African American novel. In: Cassuto, L., Eby, C.V., Reiss, B. (eds.) The Cambridge History of the American Novel, pp. 1064–1083. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Keller, Y.: “Was it right to love her brother’s wife so passionately?” Lesbian pulp novels and US lesbian identity, 1950–1965. Am. Q. 57(2), 385–410 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nealon, C.S.: Invert-history: the ambivalence of lesbian pulp fiction. New Lit. Hist. 31(4), 745–764 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fidel, R.: Human Information Interaction: An Ecological Approach to Information Behavior. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Brouilette, S.: Corporate publishing and canonization: “Neuromancer” and science-fiction publishing in the 1970s and early 1980s. Book Hist. 5, 187–208 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Floegel, D., Costello, K.L.: “We just decided to do it ourselves”: extending theories of information poverty and small worlds with institutional small worlds and queer world-building. J. Crit. Libr. Inf. Stud. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hellekson, K., Busse, K. (eds.): The Fan Fiction Studies Reader. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chute, H.: Why Comics? HarperCollins Publishers, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gottlieb, I., Wald, G.: Smells like teen spirit: Riot Grrrls, revolution, and women in independent rock. Crit. Matrix 7(2), 11–68 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Arroyo-Ramirez, E., Chou, R.L., Freedman, J., Fujita, C., Orozco, M.: The reach of a long-arm stapler: calling in microaggressions in the LIS field through zine work. Libr. Trends 67(1), 107–130 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Coppa, F.: A brief history of media fandom. In: Hellekson, K., Busse, K. (eds.) Fan Fiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet, pp. 41–60. MacFarland & Company Inc, Jefferson (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. DeKosnik, A.: Rogue Archives: Digital Cultural Memory and Media Fandom. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Duggan, J.: Revising hegemonic masculinity: homosexuality, masculinity, and youth-authored Harry Potter fanfiction. Bookbird: J. Int. Child. Lit. 55(2), 38–45 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hoad, C.: Slashing through the boundaries: heavy metal fandom, fan fiction and girl cultures. Media Music Stud. 3(1), 5–22 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Coppa, F.: An archive of our own. In: Jamison, A. (ed.) Fic: Why Fanfiction is Taking Over the World, pp. 302–308. Smart Pop, Dallas (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Noble, S.: Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press, New York (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Pande, R.: Squee from the Margins: Fandom and Race. Iowa University Press, Iowa City (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Perano, U., Primack, D.: Verizon agrees to sell Tumblr to owner of Wordpress. AXIOS. https://www.axios.com/verizon-tumblr-wordpress-automattic-e6645edd-bc73-45c2-9380-9fe8ca34291f.html

  38. Gorichanaz, T.: Information creation and models of information behavior: grounded synthesis and further research. J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci. 50, 998–1006 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Quirk, L.: Proliferating ephemera in print and digital media. Engl. Stud. Canada 42(3/4), 22–24 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Campbell, J., Aragon, C., Davis, K., Evans, S., Evans, A., Randall, D.: Thousands of positive reviews: distributed mentoring in online fan communities. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 691–704. ACM, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fiesler, C., Morrison, S., Shapiro, R.B., Bruckman, A.S.: Growing their own: legitimate peripheral participation for computational learning in an online fandom community. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp. 1375–1386. ACM, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S.L., Majchrzak, A.: Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22, 1224–1239 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Long, S.: ‘Euphoria’’s controversial One Direction scene teaches a lesson on ‘real person fan fiction’. https://www.dukechronicle.com/article/2019/09/euphorias-controversial-one-direction-scene-teaches-a-lesson-on-real-person-fan-fiction

  44. Ardichvili, A., Maurer, M., Li, W., Wentling, T., Stuedemann, R.: Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice. J. Knowl. Manag. 10, 94–107 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610650139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bourdon, I., Kimble, C., Tessier, N.: Knowledge sharing in online communities: the power game. J. Bus. Strategy 36, 11–17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-04-2014-0044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Huffaker, D.: Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities. Hum. Commun. Res. 36, 593–617 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01390.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. DIY Book Scanner. https://www.diybookscanner.org/en/index.html

  48. Johnson, R.J., Fong, C.L.: The expanding universe of Sherlockian fandom and archival collections. Transform. Works Cult. 23 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2017.0792

  49. Ocepek, M.: Bringing out the everyday in everyday information behavior. J. Doc. 74, 398–411 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hartel, J.: Managing documents at home for serious leisure: a case study of the hobby of gourmet cooking. J. Doc. 66, 847–874 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Gibson, A.N., Martin, J.D.: Re-situating information poverty: information marginalization and parents of individuals with disabilities. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 70, 476–487 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Keyes, O.: The misgendering machines: Trans/HCI implications of automatic gender recognition. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human Computer Interaction, no. 88. ACM, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Huq, A.Z.: Racial equity in algorithmic criminal justice. Duke Law J. 88(663) (2019). Paper no. 663

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bennet, C.L., Keyes, O.: What is the point of fairness? Disability, AI, and the complexity of justice. In: Workshop-AI Fairness for People with Disabilities, 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. arXiv:1908.01024

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Floegel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Floegel, D., Moulaison-Sandy, H., Hammond, A., Wenzel, S.G. (2020). Creating a Space for “Lowbrow” Information Behavior: From Dime Novels to Online Communities. In: Sundqvist, A., Berget, G., Nolin, J., Skjerdingstad, K. (eds) Sustainable Digital Communities. iConference 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12051. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43686-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43687-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics