Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Conference on Information

iConference 2020: Sustainable Digital Communities pp 186–197Cite as

Information Quality of Reddit Link Posts on Health News

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

  • 2858 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12051))

Abstract

Inaccuracy has been a common problem in news coverage of scientific research. This problem has been particularly prevalent in health research news. Health research news usually spreads from research publications and press releases to news and social media. In this study we examined the information quality of the Reddit link posts that introduce health news stories. We developed a coding schema to annotate the inaccurate information in a sample of 250 link posts on health research news within the Reddit community r/Health in 2018. The result shows that most link posts simply copied the original news headlines verbatim, while some paraphrased the news stories by adding, deleting, replacing, and combining content. We found that 12 paraphrased link posts contained inaccurate information that may mislead the readers. The most common type of inaccuracy is exaggeration resulted from changing the original speculative claims to direct causal statements by removing the modal verbs such as “may” and “might”. The result shows that although the link posts of health news were generally faithful to the original news stories, exaggerated claims may lead to false hope for researchers and patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.redditinc.com/.

  2. 2.

    https://i.imgur.com/y1Lix2T.png.

  3. 3.

    https://nnlm.gov/initiatives/topics/health-literacy.

  4. 4.

    https://pushshift.io/.

  5. 5.

    https://github.com/codelucas/newspaper.

References

  1. Tankard, J.W., Ryan, M.: News source perceptions of accuracy of science coverage. Journal. Q. 51, 219–225 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1177/107769907405100204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pellechia, M.G.: Trends in science coverage: a content analysis of three US newspapers. Public Underst. Sci. 6, 49–68 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/6/1/004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sumner, P., et al.: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study. BMJ 349, g7015 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, C.: Inaccuracy in health research news: a typology and predictions of scientists’ perceptions of the accuracy of research news. J. Health Commun. 20, 177–186 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.917746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fahnestock, J.: Accommodating science: the rhetorical life of scientific facts. Writ. Commun. 15, 330–350 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088398015003006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buhse, S., Rahn, A.C., Bock, M., Mühlhauser, I.: Causal interpretation of correlational studies – analysis of medical news on the website of the official journal for German physicians. PLoS ONE 13, e0196833 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Glenski, M., Pennycuff, C., Weninger, T.: Consumers and curators: browsing and voting patterns on reddit. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 4, 196–206 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2017.2742242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brossard, D., Scheufele, D.A.: Science, new media, and the public. Science 339, 40–41 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ovadia, S.: More than just cat pictures: Reddit as a curated news source. Behav. Soc. Sci. Libr. 34, 37–40 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2015.996491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao, Y., Zhang, J.: Consumer health information seeking in social media: a literature review. Health Inf. Libr. J. 34, 268–283 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Belt, T.H.V., Engelen, L.J., Berben, S.A., Teerenstra, S., Samsom, M., Schoonhoven, L.: Internet and social media for health-related information and communication in health care: preferences of the Dutch general population. J. Med. Internet Res. 15, e220 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma, R., Wigginton, B., Meurk, C., Ford, P., Gartner, C.: Motivations and limitations associated with vaping among people with mental illness: a qualitative analysis of Reddit discussions. IJERPH 14, 7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14010007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cole, J., Watkins, C., Kleine, D.: Health advice from internet discussion forums: how bad is dangerous? J. Med. Internet Res. 18, e4 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stoddard, G.: Popularity dynamics and intrinsic quality in Reddit and hacker news. In: ICWSM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Record, R.A., Silberman, W.R., Santiago, J.E., Ham, T.: I sought it, i Reddit: examining health information engagement behaviors among Reddit users. J. Health Commun. 23, 470–476 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Horne, B.D., Adali, S., Sikdar, S.: Identifying the social signals that drive online discussions: a case study of Reddit communities. In: 2017 26th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN), pp. 1–9 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Medvedev, A.N., Delvenne, J.-C., Lambiotte, R.: Modelling structure and predicting dynamics of discussion threads in online boards. J. Complex Netw. 7, 67–82 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cny010

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Straub-Cook, P.: Source, please? Digit. Journal. 6, 1314–1332 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1412801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aniche, M., et al.: How modern news aggregators help development communities shape and share knowledge. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 499–510 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shinyama, Y., Sekine, S.: Paraphrase acquisition for information extraction. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Paraphrasing, vol. 16, pp. 65–71. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Callison-Burch, C., Koehn, P., Osborne, M.: Improved statistical machine translation using paraphrases. In: Proceedings of the Main Conference on Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pp. 17–24. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barrón-Cedeño, A., Vila, M., Martí, M., Rosso, P.: Plagiarism meets paraphrasing: insights for the next generation in automatic plagiarism detection. Comput. Linguist. 39, 917–947 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fader, A., Zettlemoyer, L., Etzioni, O.: Paraphrase-driven learning for open question answering. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Long Papers, vol. 1, pp. 1608–1618. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Culicover, P.W.: Paraphrase generation and information retrieval from stored text. Mech. Transl. Comput. Linguist. 11, 78–88 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bhagat, R., Hovy, E.: What is a paraphrase? Comput. Linguist. 39, 463–472 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vila, M., Martí, M.A., Rodríguez, H.: Paraphrase concept and typology. A linguistically based and computationally oriented approach. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Nat. 46, 83–90 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fujita, A.: Automatic generation of syntactically well-formed and semantically appropriate paraphrases (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smith, D.E., Wilson, A.J., Henry, D.A.: Monitoring the quality of medical news reporting: early experience with media doctor. Med. J. Aust. 183, 190–193 (2005). https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb06992.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. How well do Canadian media outlets convey medical treatment information? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3090174/

  30. Schwitzer, G.: How do US journalists cover treatments, tests, products, and procedures? An evaluation of 500 stories. PLOS Med. 5, e95 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chang, C.: Inaccuracy in health research news: a typology and predictions of scientists’ perceptions of the accuracy of research news. J. Health Commun. 20, 177–186 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L.M.: Press releases: translating research into news. JAMA 287, 2856–2858 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Moynihan, R., et al.: Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications. N. Engl. J. Med. 342, 1645–1650 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Greenberg, S.A.: How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network. BMJ 339, b2680 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cyranoski, D.: ‘Reprogrammed’ stem cells approved to mend human hearts for the first time. Nature 557, 619 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, China

    Haichen Zhou

  2. Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA

    Haichen Zhou & Bei Yu

Authors
  1. Haichen Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bei Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bei Yu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway

    Anneli Sundqvist

  2. OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway

    Gerd Berget

  3. University of Boras, Boras, Sweden

    Jan Nolin

  4. OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway

    Kjell Ivar Skjerdingstad

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhou, H., Yu, B. (2020). Information Quality of Reddit Link Posts on Health News. In: Sundqvist, A., Berget, G., Nolin, J., Skjerdingstad, K. (eds) Sustainable Digital Communities. iConference 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12051. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43686-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43687-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation