Skip to main content

Liquidity Risk Related to Financial Transactions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 610 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

In any financial transaction, the parties try to get the best possible result by taking into account information on the features of the operation and on the liquidity of that particular financial instrument. To that effect, the size of the package of financial instruments to be sold/purchased, the time frame for the operation to be completed, and the target price of the transaction, will all be taken into account. As regards the liquidity of the market of that particular financial instrument, the reference/market price of the financial instrument, the costs relevant to the transaction, the market depth, the volume of traded instruments, and the value of the transactions concluded during the previous period, etc. shall be taken into account. The liquidity risk can be regarded as that part of the value of a transaction that could not be obtained by an investor/a financial entity, according to his/its calculations made before concluding the operation, because the transaction was too large and was concluded within a very short time as compared to the market depth. In other words, if a large transaction does not take the market depth into account, a lower price than the targeted one will be obtained. In the following, we are going to present an assessment methodology for the liquidity risk attached to transactions, as well as various methods to keep the impact of this risk at insignificant levels. These methodologies for the assessment and reduction of the liquidity risk attached to financial transactions could be used by various financial entities involved in financial trading or financial asset portfolios administration activities. Also, these methodologies can be adapted and used by the market infrastructure entities or by the IT companies that develop trading or risk management applications for financial entities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anghelache, C., & Bodó, G. (2018). Liquidity risk analysis at financial institutions. Romanian Statistical Review, Supplement No. 1, 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel III–ARB. https://www.bnr.ro/Monitorizarea-in-domeniul-platilor-3105.aspxhttps://www.arb.ro/basel-iii.

  • Commission Implementing Regulation (EU). (2016). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/322 of 10 February 2016 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards about supervisory reporting of institutions of the liquidity coverage requirement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU). (2016). Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/322 of 10 February 2016 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards about supervisory reporting of institutions of the liquidity coverage requirement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedu, V. & Niţescu, DC. (2012). Basel III—between thinking globally and acting locally. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 6(571), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive. (2013). Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive. (2014). Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (recast—MiFID II).

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive (EU). (2016). Directive (EU) 2016/1034 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 June 2016 amending Directive 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disclosure framework and Assessment methodology. (2012). Disclosure framework and assessment methodology; Bank for international Settlements & OICV-IOSCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Banking Authority. (2018). ‘Risk Dashboard’. Retrieved from http://www.eba.europa.eu/risk-analysisand-data/risk-dashboard.

  • European Securities and Markets Authorities. (2018). ‘Risk Dashboard’. Retrieved from https://www.esma.europa.eu/market-analysis/financialstability.

  • European Systemic Risk Board. (2018). ‘Risk Dashboard’. Retrieved from http://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/rd/html/index.en.html.

  • Principles for financial market infrastructures. (2012). Principles for financial market infrastructures; Bank for international Settlements & OICV-IOSCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulation (EU). (2013). Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulation (EU). (2014). Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (MiFIR).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurențiu Paul Barangă .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Barangă, L.P. (2020). Liquidity Risk Related to Financial Transactions. In: Fotea, S., Fotea, I., Văduva, S. (eds) Challenges and Opportunities to Develop Organizations Through Creativity, Technology and Ethics. GSMAC 2019. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43449-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics