Skip to main content

Teaching Entrepreneurship: How Prepared are Romanian Educators?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Challenges and Opportunities to Develop Organizations Through Creativity, Technology and Ethics (GSMAC 2019)

Abstract

The challenges of the knowledge-based economy, entrepreneurship, and the digital world determine radical changes, not only to the teaching of younger generations but also in the education of teachers. Numerous (EU or otherwise) studies highlight the fact that, despite ample political and managerial rhetoric, entrepreneurial abilities, and values, are rarely implemented in teacher training programs. Beyond a novel and change-inducing aspect, the challenge of teaching entrepreneurship is not only an issue of acquiring knowledge on launching and managing a business but rather of developing attitudes and abilities required to act in an entrepreneurial manner. Promoting creative and innovative approaches to learning, encouraging experimentation, and coping with failure (traits which broadly describe the entrepreneurial profile) are slowly integrated into entrepreneurial education. In spite of significant differences between countries, most teachers consider that they require support in their initial education, continuing professional development, and day-to-day activity to perform in the field. In this paper, we present the results of a survey-based research, conducted among high school teachers acting in three counties in northwestern Romania, on the efficiency of teaching entrepreneurship in high school courses, understanding and applying modern educational methods, the involvement of educators in stimulating youths’ interest in economic mechanisms and developing entrepreneurial abilities, such as identifying and exploiting business opportunities, thus outlining a (partial) snapshot of the understanding of the requirements, resources, and realities of entrepreneurial and economic education of its importance in the economic and social development of Romania.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude–behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badulescu, D., Bungau, C., & Badulescu, A. (2015). Sustainable development through sustainable businesses. An empirical research among master students. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 16(3), 1101–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badulescu, D., Perticas, D., Hatos, R., & Csintalan, C. (2018). Students’ entrepreneurial skills and European HEI’s performance in entrepreneurship and innovation: A case study, Ostrava, Czech Republic. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on European Integration 2018, May 17–18, 2018, pp. 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2016). Entrepreneurship education at school in Europe. Eurydice report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: Enabling teachers as a critical success factor. Retrieved March 5, 2018, from https://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/9272/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native.

  • European Commission. (2012). Flash Eurobarometer 354, entrepreneurship in the EU and beyond. Report 2012. European Commission, Directorate-General Enterprise and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2014). Thematic working group on entrepreneurship education: Final report. Retrieved September 2, 2018, from https://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/strategic-framework/archive/documents/entrepreneurship-report.

  • Europen-pen International (2018) About us. Retrieved September 12, 2018, from https://www.penworldwide.org/.

  • Gartner, W., & Vesper, K. (1994). Executive forum: Experiments in entrepreneurship education: Successes and failures. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2014). GEM 2014 Global Report. Retrieved June 12, 2018, from https://www.gemconsortium.org/report.

  • Hills, G. (1988). Variations in university entrepreneurship education: An empirical study of an evolving field. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junior Achievement. (2016). EU Projects. Retrieved September 12, 2018, from https://www.jaeurope.org/education/eu-projects.html.

  • Ministry of Education, Research and Youth/Ministerul Educației, Cercetării și Tineretului. (2008). Ordinul nr. 5109 privind înființarea Centralei Rețelei Firmelor de Exercițiu/Întreprinderilor Simulate din România/Order no. 5109 regarding the establishment of the Network of Exercise Firms/Simulated Enterprises Networks in Romania. MONITORUL OFICIAL nr. 651/2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neck, H., & Green, P. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: Known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sava, D., & Badulescu, A. (2017). Cultural employment by level of education. Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, 2(2), 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G., Duffy, S., & Tarabishy, A. (2002). The state of entrepreneurship education in the United States: A nationwide survey and analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(1), 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • The George Washington University Center for Entrepreneurial Excellence. (2014). The national survey of entrepreneurship education. An overview of 2012–2014 survey data. The George Washington University Center for Entrepreneurial Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (pp. 119–138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesper, K., & McMullan, W. (1987). Entrepreneurship education in the nineties. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, C., & Rice, G. (1987). Entrepreneurship/small business education in American universities. Journal of Small Business Management, 25(1), 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alina Bădulescu or Daniel Bădulescu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bădulescu, A., Bădulescu, D., Csintalan, C., Simuț, R. (2020). Teaching Entrepreneurship: How Prepared are Romanian Educators?. In: Fotea, S., Fotea, I., Văduva, S. (eds) Challenges and Opportunities to Develop Organizations Through Creativity, Technology and Ethics. GSMAC 2019. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43449-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics