Skip to main content

Fatigue Life Distribution Estimation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reliability and Statistical Computing

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

Abstract

Modeling fatigue life is complex whether it is applied to structures or experimental programs. Through the years several empirical approaches have been utilized. Each approach has positive aspects; however, none have been acceptable for every circumstance. On many occasions the primary shortcoming for an empirical method is the lack of a sufficiently robust database for statistical modeling. The modeling is exacerbated for loading near typical operating conditions because the scatter in the fatigue lives is quite large. The scatter may be attributed to microstructure, manufacturing, or experimental inconsistencies, or a combination thereof. Empirical modeling is more challenging for extreme life estimation because those events are rare. The primary purpose herein is to propose an empirically based methodology for estimating the cumulative distribution functions for fatigue life, given the applied load. The methodology incorporates available fatigue life data for various stresses or strains using a statistical transformation to merge all the life data so that distribution estimation is more accurate than traditional approaches. Subsequently, the distribution for the transformed and merged data is converted using change-of-variables to estimate the distribution for each applied load. To assess the validity of the proposed methodology percentile bounds are estimated for the life data. The development of the methodology and its subsequent validation is illustrated using three sets of fatigue life data which are readily available in the open literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

α, β, γ:

Weibull cdf parameters

αs:

significance

AD:

Anderson–Darling goodness of fit test

cdf:

cumulative distribution function

cv :

coefficient of variation

Δε:

strain range

Δσ:

stress range

FLT:

Fatigue Life Transformation

F(•):

cdf

KS:

Kolmogorov–Smirnov goodness of fit test

MLE:

maximum likelihood estimation

N A :

arbitrary normalization constant

N f :

cycles to failure

n :

sample size

m :

number of different values of applied stress

p :

percentile

s :

sample standard deviation

s A :

arbitrary normalization constant

S–N:

stress–number of cycles

t :

time, cycles

W(α, β, γ):

three parameter Weibull cdf

y 1/2 :

median

\(\bar{y}\) :

sample average

References

  1. Harlow DG, Wei RP, Sakai T, Oguma N (2006) Crack growth based probability modeling of S-N response for high strength steel. Int J Fatigue 28:1479–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Castillo E, Fernández-Canteli A (2009) A unified statistical methodology for modeling fatigue damage. Springer Science and Business Media B.V., Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Schneider CRA, Maddox SJ (2003) Best practice guide on statistical analysis of fatigue data. International Institute of Welding, IIW-XIII-WG1-114-03, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  4. Collins JA (1993) Failure of materials in mechanical design: analysis, prediction, prevention, 2nd edn. Wiley-Interscience Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Little RE, Ekvall JC (eds) (1981) Statistical analysis of fatigue data. ASTM STP744, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zheng X-L, Jiang B, Lü H (1995) Determination of probability distribution of fatigue strength and expressions of P–S–N curves. Eng Fracture Mech 50:483–491

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shimizu S (2005) P–S–N/P–F–L curve approach using three-parameter Weibull distribution for life and fatigue analysis of structural and rolling contact components. Tribol Trans 48:576–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernández–Canteli A, Blasón S, Correia JAFO, de Jesus AMP (2014) A probabilistic interpretation of the miner number for fatigue life prediction. FratturaedIntegritàStrutturale 30:327–339

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shimokawa T, Hamaguchi Y (1985) Relationship between fatigue life distribution, notch configuration, and S-N curve of a 2024–T4 Aluminum Alloy. Trans ASME J Eng Mater Technol 107:214–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harlow DG (2005) Probability versus statistical modeling: examples from fatigue life prediction. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 12:1–16

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Harlow DG (2011) Generalized probability distributions for accelerated life modeling. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 4:980–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sakai T, Nakajima M, Tokaji K, Hasegawa N (1997) Statistical distribution patterns in mechanical and fatigue properties of metallic materials. Mater Sci Res Int 3:63–74

    Google Scholar 

  13. IF_DDQ_HDG70G_Strain_Life_Fatigue.xls www.autosteel.org (2004). Automotive Applications Council, Steel Market Development Institute, Auto/Steel–Partnership Fatigue Data

  14. Harlow DG (2014) Low cycle fatigue: probability and statistical modeling of fatigue life. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 pressure vessels and piping conference, PVP2014–28114, Anaheim, CA, 20–24 July 2014, V06BT06A045. ISBN 978–0–7918–4604–9

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harlow DG (2017) Confidence bounds for fatigue distribution functions. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2017 pressure vessels and piping conference, PVP2017–65416, Waikoloa, HI, 16–20 July 2017. V01AT01A011. ISBN 978–0–7918–5790–8

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas GB, Varma RK (1993) Evaluation of low cycle fatigue test data in the BCR/VAMAS intercomparison programme. Commission of the European Communities, BCR Information Applied Metrology, Brussels, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harlow DG (2007) Probabilistic property prediction. Eng Fract Mech 74:2943–2951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weibull EHW (1951) A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. ASME J Appl Mech 18:293–297

    Google Scholar 

  19. Abernethy RB (2006) In: Abernethy RB (ed) The new Weibull handbook, 5th edn. 536 Oyster Road, North Palm Beach, Florida, pp 33408–34328

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rinne H (2009) The Weibull distribution. CRC Press, Chapman-Hall, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Gary Harlow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gary Harlow, D. (2020). Fatigue Life Distribution Estimation. In: Pham, H. (eds) Reliability and Statistical Computing. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43412-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43412-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43411-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43412-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics