Abstract
Based on John Henry Newman’s (1801–1890) conception of university as laid down in his treatise The Idea of a University (1858), the paper discusses the role of conceptual metaphors in structuring contemporary Polish educational discourse as compared and contrasted with Newman’s ideas of a university. The data examined appear to indicate that some of Newman’s metaphors, such as university as a battle field, knowledge is truth, knowledge is beauty, are valid in the Polish cultural context; they form highly structured metaphorical networks in the sense of Kövecses (Where metaphors come from? Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2015). In accordance with recent metaphor studies, the paper points to the importance of linguistic metaphors, which “add vividness to speech” (Gibbs in The poetics of mind: figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; New York, USA, p. 125f, 1994; Sopory and Dillard in Hum Commun Res 28(3):408, 2002), viewing the “conventional versus novel metaphors” opposition as forming “a cline of metaphoricity” (Lakoff and Johnson in Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, 1980; Urquidi in Catalan J Linguist 14:221–222, 2015). Finally, following the insights in Kövecses (Metaphor and discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK, p. 24, 2009), we demonstrate that the examined conceptual metaphors vary along two major dimensions: intercultural (cross-cultural) and intracultural (within-culture).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Typically, conceptual metaphors are written in small caps.
- 2.
The results obtained in the research reveal there seem to be three main networks of conceptual metaphors, which derive from three basic universal metaphors, namely: life is a building, life is an organism, and life is a journey. On their grounds all metaphors structuring our understanding of Newman’s vision of a university are set. Due to space limitation, only the first network is elaborated in detail. Undoubtedly, the other two networks of conceptual metaphors derived from Newman’s work deserve some proper attention in the future study.
- 3.
Addressing Ireland in The Idea of a University, Newman explained his philosophy of education “with such a largeness and liberality of view as Oxford (…) had never taught him” (Barry, 1911, online).
- 4.
The National Corpus of Polish [Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego] is the biggest and the most important corpus of the Polish language. It has been retrieved from http://www.nkjp.uni.lodz.pl/ between January, 1 and July, 5, 2019.
The National Corpus of Polish is a shared initiative, which has been carried out as a research-development project of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education. It contains over fifteen hundred millions of words. The corpus is searchable by means of advanced tools that analyse Polish inflection and the Polish sentence structure.
The list of sources for the corpora contains classic literature, daily newspapers, specialist periodicals and journals, transcripts of conversations, and a variety of short-lived and internet texts, from various age groups, coming from various regions in Poland.
References
Barry, W. (1911). John Henry Newman. In The Catholic encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved from http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10794a.htm.
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cruse, D. A. (2006). A glossary of semantics and pragmatics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Davies, N. (1999). The Isles: A history. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Deignan, A. (1999). Linguistic metaphors and collocation in nonliterary corpus data. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(1), 19–36.
Falck, Johansson M. (2012). Metaphor variation across L1 and L2 speakers of English: Do differences at the level of linguistic metaphor matter? In F. MacArthur, J. L. Oncins-Martinez, M. Sánchez-García, & A. M. Piquer-Piriz (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication (pp. 109–134). Amsterdam, Netherlands; Philadelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge, UK; New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Hiner, A. (2015). John Henry Cardinal Newman, the idea of a university. HMXP Anthology Summary. Retrieved from http://www2.winthrop.edu/login/uc/hmxp/Newman%20Summary%20Hiner.pdf.
Hoffman, S. (2015, March 17). Ireland and Poland: A history of Solidarity. Krakow Post. Retrieved from http://www.krakowpost.com/8908/2015/03/ireland-and-poland-a-history-of-solidarity.
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2009). Metaphor, culture, and discourse: The pressure of coherence. In A. Musolff & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and discourse (pp. 11–24). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from?. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2017). Conceptual metaphor theory. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor (pp. 13–27). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Kövecses, Z. (2018). Metaphor in media language and cognition: A perspective from conceptual metaphor theory. Lege Artis: Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, 3(1), 124–141.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, USA; London, UK: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge, UK: University Press Cambridge.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980/2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, USA: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Newman, J. H. (1858). The idea of a university. London, UK: Longmans. Retrieved from http://www.newmanreader.org/works/idea/index.html.
Sopory, P., & Dillard, J. (2002). The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 382–419.
(The) Catholic Union and Times. (1896). Retrieved from http://ampoleagle.com/a-look-at-the-irishpolish-connection-p5753-147.htm.
(The) National Corpus of Polish (NKJP). Retrieved from http://www.nkjp.uni.lodz.pl/.
Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H. J. (1996). An introduction to cognitive linguistics. Hillsdale, MI, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Urquidi, A. (2015). Meaning construction in creative metaphors: Conventional meaning integration through generic interfacing in a blend, and conditions of propagation and lexicalization. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 14, 219–237.
Wierzbicka, A. (2006). English: Meaning and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yang, C. D. (2002). Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Warchoł, A. (2020). Metaphors as an Intracultural Bridge for Educational Enterprise. In: Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (eds) Cultural Conceptualizations in Translation and Language Applications. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43336-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43336-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43335-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43336-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)