Skip to main content

Text and Interpretation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 414 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is aimed at analyzing how the listener can comprehend the narrator’s speech. It treats the notion of text and its double nature as an object of interpretation and as an interpretation itself. Discussing Genette’s notion of paratext, Jacobson’s model of communication, and Eco’s theory of interpretation, a provisory model is proposed regarding three type of interpretation according the main point of view that is chosen: the point of view of the Author, the point of view of the text, and that of the reader. It is shown how these ways of interpreting can work together and cooperate using excerpts of a psychoanalytical session as examples. In this way, the concept of narrative interpretation is proposed. It is meant as an act of cooperation among these different points of view with which an interpretation is elaborated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 1960, the Lisbon National Library purchased a linen trunk found in Pessoa’s house, in which more than 27,000 documents made it possible to understand Pessoa’s heteronymy. In the words of Pessoa: “Since I was a child I have had the tendency to create a fictitious world around me, to surround myself with friends and acquaintances who had never existed [...] Ever since I met myself as the one I call “I” I remember having mentally drawn, in appearance, movements, character and history, various unreal figures that were so visible to me and mine as things of what we call maybe abusively real life” (letter of 13 January 1935 to Adolfo Casais Monteiro, in Parini [2012, 21]). See also Ceccucci (2012) for the problem of heteronyms.

  2. 2.

    In a much earlier work (Bruner et al. 1978) Bruner himself highlights the links of phylogenetic and ontogenetic dependence of language on action: the syntax of language is derived from the syntax of action (see the “cases”: agent, action, object, place, etc.). Language would slowly autonomize itself from actions (Bruner et al. 1978, 56).

References

  • Barbieri, G. L. (2007). Tra testo ed inconscio. Milan: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1967). The death of the author. Aspen, no. 5/6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolognini, S. (2002). L’empatia psicoanalitica. Turin: Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1978). In A. Jolly & K. Silva (Eds.), Play: its role in development and evolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J., & Weisser, S. (1991). The invention of self: autobiography and its forms. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Literacy and orality (pp. 129–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccucci, P. (2012). F. Pessoa, un’affollata solitudine. Milan: BUR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortellazzo, M., & Zolli, P. (1983). Dizionario etimologico della lingua italiana. Bologna: Zanichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devoto, G. (1968). Avviamento alla etimologia italiana: dizionario etimologico. Florence: Le Monnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1990). I limiti della interpretazione. Milan: Bompiani. English edition: Eco, U. (1990). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genette, G. (1987). Seuil. Paris: Seuils. English edition: Genette, G. (1997). Paratexts. Thresholds of interpretation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, R. (1963). Essais de linguistique générale. (French edition). Paris: Éditions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. (1986). Event knowledge, structure and function in development. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. (1996). Language in cognitive development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parini, E. G. (2012). Gli occhiali di Pessoa. Macerata: Quodlibet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sholes, R. (1982). Semiotics and interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D., & Hartzell, M. (2003). Parenting from the inside out: how a deeper self-understanding can help you raise children who thrive. New York: TarcherPerigee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smorti, A. (1997). Il Sé come testo. Florence: Giunti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, N. L. & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. Freedle (Ed.), New Directions in Discourse Processing (pp. 53-120). Norwood (NJ): Ablex, vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Smorti, A. (2020). Text and Interpretation. In: Telling to Understand. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43161-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics