Abstract
According to the dominant structuralist view, a language system (la langue) can be approached on its own, independently of speech (la parole) as well as the plurality of world languages (les langues). Bally and Sechehaye established this presumed autonomy of the language system by means of dubitable editorial strategies. They inserted an apocryphal statement, according to which language (la langue) is a single and simple object of linguistic study, into the conclusion of the Course in General Linguistics, and they subsequently cited it in dedicated book reviews and specialized essays in linguistics. This so-called famous formula became a structuralist motto. It created an impression of a seamless transition from Saussureanism to structuralism. Furthermore, the editorial presentation of Saussure’s argument in the Introduction to the Course tends to overstate the distinction between la langue and la parole such that la langue alone is deemed an object worthy of scientific interest.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Stawarska 2015, 109–119, for further discussion of viewpoints, and the related “involuntary assumption of substance” in linguistics.
References
Bally, Charles. 1965. Le Langage et la vie. Vol. 34 of Publications Romanes et Françaises, ed. Jean Frappier. Geneva: Librarie Droz. First published 1925. A modified version of Bally’s 1913 essay under the same title appears in this anthology.
Bouquet, Simon. 2003. Saussure après un siècle. In Cahier de l’Herne: Ferdinand de Saussure, ed. Simon Bouquet, 11–15. Paris: Editions de l’Herne.
Engler, Rudolf, ed. 1989. Cours de linguistique générale, by Ferdinand de Saussure. Vol. 1. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. First published 1967–68.
Godel, Robert. 1957. Les Sources manuscrites du “Cours de linguistique générale” de F. de Saussure. Geneva: E. Droz.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1974. The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics. Ed. Don Ihde. Trans. Kathleen McLaughlin. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1954. Notes inédites de F. de Saussure. Introduction and notations by R. G. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure (12): 49–71.
———. 1993. Troisième cours de linguistique générale (1910–1911): d’après les cahiers d’Emile Constantin/Saussure’s Third Course of Lectures on General Linguistics (1910–1911): From the Notebooks of Emile Constantin. Ed. Eisuke Komatsu. Trans. Roy Harris. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
———. 2005. Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. Tullio de Mauro. Libraire Payot.
———. 2006. Writings in General Linguistics. Ed. Simon Bouquet and Rudolf Engler, with Antoinette Weil. Trans. Carol Sanders, Matthew Pires, with Peter Figueroa. Oxford: Oxford University Press. First published in French 2002.
———. 2013. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. and annotated by Roy Harris. With a new Introduction by Roy Harris. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Sechehaye, Albert. 1940. Les Trois linguistiques saussuriennes. Zurich-Erlenbach: Eugen Rentsch Verlag.
Stawarska, Beata. 2015. Saussure’s Philosophy of Language as Phenomenology: Undoing the Doctrine of the Course in General Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stawarska, B. (2020). La langue, the Proper Object of Linguistics. In: Saussure’s Linguistics, Structuralism, and Phenomenology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43097-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43097-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43096-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43097-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)