Skip to main content

The Structuralist Legacy: A Modern Human Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Saussure’s Linguistics, Structuralism, and Phenomenology
  • 663 Accesses

Abstract

The Course in General Linguistics played a significant role for the establishment of scientific structuralism in the 1950s’ and 1960s’ France. The structuralist readers tended to gloss over the complications befalling this posthumously edited text by receiving it reverently as the Vulgate, a popular scripture upon which the school of structuralism can be based. Foucault’s analysis of the authorial function helps to explain how the Course functioned ideologically as Saussure’s work, despite the empirical complications regarding its historical provenance and authorship; Foucault’s analysis also sheds light on the concurrent neglect of Saussure’s Nachlass. Lacan’s psychoanalysis provides a representative example of how structural scientists tended to appropriate the Course in the humanities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barthes, Roland. 1972. Critical Essays. Trans. Richard Howard. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culler, Jonathan, ed. 2006. Structuralism: Critical Concepts in Literary and Cultural Studies. Vol. 4. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosse, François. 1997. History of Structuralism. Trans. Deborah Glassman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2002. What Is an Author? In The Death and Resurrection of the Author? ed. William Irwin, 9–22. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Manfred. 1989. What Is Neostructuralism? Trans. Sabine Wilke and Richard Gray. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadet, Françoise. 1989. Saussure and Contemporary Culture. Trans. Elliott Gregory. London: Hutchinson Radius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, Jacques. 2006. Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English. Trans. Bruce Fink. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1963. Structural Anthropology. Trans. Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounin, Georges. 1968. Saussure, ou le structuraliste sans le savoir. Paris: P. Seghers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, Ferdinand de. 2005. Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. Tullio de Mauro. Libraire Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. Roy Harris. Introduction by Roy Harris. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturrock, John. 2003. Structuralism. 2nd ed. Introduction by Jean-Michel Rabaté. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beata Stawarska .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stawarska, B. (2020). The Structuralist Legacy: A Modern Human Science. In: Saussure’s Linguistics, Structuralism, and Phenomenology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43097-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics