Skip to main content

An In-Depth Inquiry on the Drawbacks of BIM Implementation

A Case of a Large Scale Public Construction Project in Turkey

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Building Information Modeling (EBF 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1188))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents an in-depth enquiry for a case in the current condition of BIM implementation in Turkey. The research study is based on the specific collaborative experiences of an architectural design firm and a contractor firm on a large scale public construction project. It seeks to address the requirement for comprehending the idea of integrated project delivery provided with the collaboration opportunities of the BIM technology. It intends to demonstrate how the fields of policy and process interlock in the BIM activity of the selected case. It also aims to exemplify the handicaps of partial BIM implementation in a complex building production process. The research methodology is content-analysis of the in-depth interviews with the managers of the current production process from both architectural and contractor firms. Questions were designed to gather case-specific data in relation to the four fundamental features of the 3rd generation production process defined by Cooper [4]. The research findings indicate that although the production requirements fit the 3rd generation process, it is constrained by the public procurement law in force. It seems evident that there is a tension between the traditional workflow and the integrated process with increased productivity and quality that BIM enables and requires. This results in a noteworthy ratio of resource waste that the contractor has to compensate in this specific case. This study contributes to the ongoing research and discussion on the drawbacks of BIM implementation, by illustrating the requirement for the redefined and rearranged roles and processes of production with a precisely guaranteed resource economy and increased quality of work equally for all parties. It presents an example case for BIM implementation and process management to illustrate the current state of the public construction industry in Turkey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arayici, Y., Coates, P., Koskela, L., Kagioglou, M., Usher, C., O’Reilly, K.J.S.S.: BIM adoption and implementation for architectural practices. Struct. Surv. 29(1), 7–25 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azhar, S.: Building information modeling (BIM): trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadersh. Manag. Eng. 11(3), 241–252 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bryde, D., Broquetas, M., Volm, J.M.: The project benefits of building information modelling (BIM). Int. J. Proj. Manag. 31(7), 971–980 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper, R.G.: Third-generation new product processes. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. Int. Publ. Prod. Devel. Manag. Assoc. 11(1), 3–14 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Dossick, C.S., Neff, G.: Organizational divisions in BIM-enabled commercial construction. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 136(4), 459–467 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., Liston, K.: BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elmualim, A., Gilder, J.: BIM: innovation in design management, influence and challenges of implementation. Architect. Eng. Des. Manag. 10(3–4), 183–199 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giel, B.K., Issa, R.R.: Return on investment analysis of using building information modeling in construction. J. Comput. Civil Eng. 27(5), 511–521 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsieh, H.F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–1288 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ilozor, B.D., Kelly, D.J.: Building information modeling and integrated project delivery in the commercial construction industry: a conceptual study. J. Eng. Proj. Prod. Manag. 2(1), 23–36 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kagioglou, M., Cooper, R., Aouad, G., Sexton, M.: Rethinking construction: the generic design and construction process protocol. Eng. Constr. Architectural Manag. 7(2), 141–153 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Love, P.E., Matthews, J., Simpson, I., Hill, A., Olatunji, O.A.: A benefits realization management building information modeling framework for asset owners. Autom. Constr. 37, 1–10 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miettinen, R., Paavola, S.: Beyond the BIM utopia: approaches to the development and implementation of building information modeling. Autom. Constr. 43, 84–91 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Popov, V., Juocevicius, V., Migilinskas, D., Ustinovichius, L., Mikalauskas, S.: The use of a virtual building design and construction model for developing an effective project concept in 5D environment. Autom. Constr. 19(3), 357–367 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sebastian, R., Prins, M.: Collaborative architectural design management. In: Emmitt, S., Prins, M., den Otter, A. (eds.) Architectural Management: International Research and Practice, pp. 105–118. Willey-Blackwell, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sebastian, R.: Changing roles of the clients, architects and contractors through BIM. Eng. Constr. Architectural Manag. 18(2), 176–187 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Succar, B.: Building information modelling framework: a research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Autom. Constr. 18(3), 357–375 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Won, J., Lee, G., Dossick, C., Messner, J.: Where to focus for successful adoption of building information modeling within organization. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 139(11), 04013014-1-10 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ece Kumkale Açıkgöz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kumkale Açıkgöz, E., Çetin, M. (2020). An In-Depth Inquiry on the Drawbacks of BIM Implementation. In: Ofluoglu, S., Ozener, O., Isikdag, U. (eds) Advances in Building Information Modeling. EBF 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1188. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42852-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42852-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42851-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42852-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics