Advertisement

Catch of the Day

Chapter
  • 117 Downloads
Part of the Environmental Discourses in Science Education book series (EDSE, volume 6)

Abstract

Beginning in our own narratives about eating fish, Alison and Rita discuss broad issues related to environmental justice for the fishers who struggle to maintain their livelihoods against policies that promote private profit over sustainability. Our stories take us from Canada and continental Portugal to the Azorean Islands in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean where we have been doing research and community work in collaboration with artisanal and small-scale fishers for the past ten years. In discussing history of governance and politics of fisheries in Europe, we outline the struggles for fishing communities. Underneath these stories lie values and images, such as “alive and kicking”, that could support the sustainability of oceans and the well-being of fishing communities. Unfortunately, myths and stereotypes about fishers and categorizing industrial scale fishing as the same as that done by people who have deep connections with fish as living neighbours, not dead “resources”, are powerful and prevalent. Listening to the voices of fishers tell about living as part of ocean ecosystems while negotiating economic and political systems which champion unlimited growth is a useful way to deal with these complex issues in formal classroom teaching as well as informal and nonformal environmental education.

Keywords

Azores Artisanal fishing Environmental justice Food Reflexive practice 

References

  1. Abecasis, R. C., Longnecker, N., Schmidt, L., & Clifton, J. (2013). Marine conservation in remote small island settings: Factors influencing marine protected area establishment in the Azores. Marine Policy, 40, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andresen, J., & Højrup, T. (2012). An alternative solution to the tragedy of enclosure. Experiences from fishermen’s development of a common community quota in Denmark. In K. Schriewer & T. Højrup (Eds.), European fisheries at a tipping-point (pp. 303–366). Murcia: Cátedra Jean Monnet Universidade de Murcia.Google Scholar
  3. Barca, S. (2014, October 18). Discussant for Wilderness Act forum. An environmental history online forum. http://environmentalhistory.net/wilderness-act-forum/
  4. Béné, C., Arthur, R., Norbury, H., Allison, E. H., Beveridge, M., Bush, S., et al. (2016). Contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to food security and poverty reduction: Assessing the current evidence. World Development, 79, 177–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkes, F. (2004). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18, 621–630.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braun, B., & Castree, N. (1998). Remaking reality: Nature at the millennium. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Bulhão Pato, C., Neilson, A., & Sousa, L. (2011, October 21–24). Exploring the wealth of coastal fisheries: Listening to community voices. Unpublished final report. Angra do Heroísmo and Ponta Delgada, Portugal. http://conferencewealthofcoastalfisheriespt.blogspot.pt/
  8. Carvalho, N., Edwards-Jones, G., & Isidro, E. J. (2011). Defining scale in fisheries: Small versus large-scale fishing operations in the Azores. Fisheries Research, 109, 360–369.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2011.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chubb, J., & Watermeyer, R. (2016). Artifice or integrity in the marketization of research impact? Investigating the moral economy of (pathways to) impact statements within research funding proposals in the UK and Australia. Studies in Higher Education, 1–13 (online).  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1144182.
  10. Cole, S. C. (1990). Cod, God, country and family. The Portuguese Newfoundland Cod fishery. MAST, 3, 1–29.Google Scholar
  11. Converse, P. E. (1972). Change in the American electorate. In A. Campbell & P. E. Converse (Eds.), The human meaning of social change (pp. 263–337). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Crook, A., & Zint, M. (1998). Guide to fisheries education resources for grades K-12. Maryland: American Fisheries Society.Google Scholar
  13. Einarsson, N. (1993). Environmental arguments and the survival of small-scale fishing in Iceland. In G. Dahl (Ed.), Green arguments and local subsistence (pp. 117–128). Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  14. Ertör, I., & Ortega, M. (2015). Political lessons from early warnings: Marine finfish aquaculture conflicts in Europe. Marine Policy, 51, 202–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.07.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. European Union and European Academies’ Science Advisory Council. (2016). Marine sustainability in an age of changing oceans and seas (EASAC policy report 28). Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  16. Gough, N. (1993). Narrative inquiry and critical pragmatism: Liberating research in environmental education. In R. Mrazek (Ed.), Alternative paradigms in environmental education research. Troy: North American Association for Environmental Education. www.edu.uleth.ca/ciccte/naceer.pgs/pubpro.pgs/alternate/14.Gough.rev.htm. Accessed 18 Sept 2000.
  17. Governo dos Açores. (2015, April). Melhor pesca, mais rendimento medidas estratégicas para o setor pesca dos açores, 2015–2020 (Better fishing, more income strategic measures for the sector of the Azores). Available online https://www.azores.gov.pt/NR/rdonlyres/C3FD7DA5-9A78-415F-B541-856BACF411E6/0/PGRPlanoAcaoParaAumentarRendimentoPescadoresCRP.pdf
  18. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hind, E. J. (2015). A review of the past, the present, and the future of fishers’ knowledge research : A challenge to established fisheries science. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72, 341–358.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Højrup, T. (2003). State, culture and life-modes. In The foundations of life-mode analysis. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  21. Højrup, T. (2011). The need for common goods for coastal communities. Gylling: Narayana Press.Google Scholar
  22. Høst, J. (2010, October 18–22). A neoliberal catch: Access rights and the clash of coastal lifemodes. Presentation at the World Small-Scale Fisheries Congress, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  23. Høst, J. (2015). Market-based fisheries management. London: Centre for Maritime Research, MARE & Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R., Bundy, A., & Mahon, R. (2010). Pyramids and roses: Alternative images for the governance of fisheries systems. Marine Policy, 34, 1315–1321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2010.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. King, T. (2003). The truth about stories: A native narrative. Toronto: House of Anansi Press.Google Scholar
  26. King, T. J. (2005). Crisis of meanings: Divergent experiences and perceptions of the marine environment in Victoria, Australia. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 16, 350–365.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-9310.2005.tb00316.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lam, M. E., & Pauly, D. (2010). Who is right to fish? Evolving a social contract for ethical fisheries. Ecology and Society, 15, 16.  https://doi.org/10.5751/es-03321-150316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. marino, d. (1997). Wild garden. Art, education and the culture of resistance. Toronto: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
  29. Merchant, C. (1997). Fish first! The changing ethics of ecosystem management. Human Ecology Review, 4, 25–30.Google Scholar
  30. Monfort, M. C. (2015). Fishing out the invisible. Samudra Report, 71, 31–34.Google Scholar
  31. Neilson, A. L., & Castro, I. (2016). Reflexive research and education for sustainable development with coastal fishing communities in the Azores islands: A theatre for questions. In P. Castro, U. M. Azeiteiro, P. Bacelar Nicolau, W. Leal Filho, & A. M. Azul (Eds.), Biodiversity and education for sustainable development (pp. 203–217). Dordrecht: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32318-3_13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neilson, A. L., Bulhão Pato, C., & Sousa, L. (2012). A short reflection on research and fishing cultures performing knowledge together /Uma breve reflexão sobre o modo como investigadores e pescadores podem cooperar pelo conhecimento. Revista Maria Scientia, 2012, 73–82.Google Scholar
  33. Neilson, A. L., Bulhão Pato, C., Gabriel, R., Arroz, A. M., Mendonça, E., & Picanço, A. (2016). In the Azores, looking for the regions of knowing. Island Studies Journal, 11(1), 35–56.Google Scholar
  34. Neves-Graça, K. (2004). Revisiting the tragedy of the commons: Ecological dilemmas of whale watching in the Azores. Human Organization, 63, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Riordan, B. (2016). New, but long overdue. Samudra Report, 72, 20–22.Google Scholar
  36. Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management, 34, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pierce, G., Pita, C., Santos, B., & Seixas, S. (2012). Sustainability of fisheries. In F. J. Goncalves, R. Pereira, W. Leal Filho, & U. Miranda Azeiteiro (Eds.), Contributions to the UN decade of education for sustainable development (pp. 325–367). Frankfort: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  38. Rigby, B., Davis, R., Bavington, D., & Baird, C. (2016). Industrial aquaculture and the politics of resignation. Marine Policy (first online).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.10.016.
  39. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rocklin, D. (2016), Who’s who in small-scale fisheries. In R. Chuenpagdee & D. Rocklin (Eds.), Small-scale fisheries of the world (Vol. I, 8 pages). TBTI Publication Series: St John’s.Google Scholar
  41. Sempere, M. J. (Ed.). (2008). Estamos cá. Existimos. As mulheres na pesca nos Açores. Ponta Delgada: UMAR Açores.Google Scholar
  42. Shackeroff, J. M., Hazen, E. L., & Crowder, L. B. (2009). The oceans as peopled seascapes. In K. McLeod & H. Leslie (Eds.), Ecosystem-based management for the oceans (pp. 33–54). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  43. Symes, D., & Hoefnagel, E. (2010). Fisheries policy, research and the social sciences in Europe: Challenges for the 21st century. Marine Policy, 34, 268–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2009.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Symes, D., Phillipson, J., & Salmi, P. (2015). Europe’s coastal fisheries: Instability and the impacts of fisheries policy. Sociologia Ruralis, 55, 245–257.  https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tacon, A. G. J., & Metian, M. (2008). Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aqua-feeds. Trends and future prospects. Aquaculture, 285, 146–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.08.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vlachopoulou, E. I. (2016). Fishing for human lives. Impacts of the refugee crisis on the fishers of Eastern Greece. Poster presentation for TBTI Symposium on European Small-Scale Fisheries and Global Linkages, Universidad de La Laguna and Oceanographic Centre of Canary Islands, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 29 June to 1 July, 2016.Google Scholar
  47. Walsh, A. (2009). Para o Santa Maria Manuela. Translated into Portuguese by Paulo da Costa, Letterpress-printed and hand-sewn limited edition. Running the Goat Press and City of St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador.Google Scholar
  48. Young, N., & Matthews, R. (2010). The aquaculture controversy in Canada: Activism, policy, and contested science. Vancouver/Toronto: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Social Studies, Colégio de S. JerónimoUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations