Abstract
The aim of the paper is a presentation and discussion of a cluster of concepts of family and home in a cross-linguistic perspective, with a particular focus on their place and position in Kazakh cultural conceptualizations. The relevant Kazakh forms include the words otbasy, januıa, áýlet, shańyraq, úı. which are discussed with reference to British English. The first part of the paper presents the kinship relations in nuclear and extended family types in the analysed languages along with a discussion of the major family roles in Kazakh. The second part depicts the particular sets of relevant cultural dimensions (Hofstede in Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Sage, Beverly Hills, 1980), which describe some of the analyzed properties. The role of particular cultures and the cultural referential character of these categories will be discussed in the concluding part.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Lakoff’s discussion is based on American English.
- 3.
Ethnodemographic situation in Kazakhstan. Archived 2003-04-16 at the Wayback Machine on ide.go.jp.
- 4.
Christopher Robbins In Search of Kazakhstan: The Land that Disappeared. London: 2007.
- 5.
- 6.
Some of the examples used in these sections are extracted from Kazakh Language Corpus (KLC) http://kazcorpus.kz/klcweb/en/search/. The KLC project is managed by Natural Language and Information Processing group of the Computer Science Lab of the Nazarbayev University Research and Innovation System. (formerly Astana, now Nursultan). The source of some other examples quoted in the present paper is an extensive study of Kazakh concept of collectivity by Aasland (2012). The examples are quoted both in the Cyrillic and Latin scripts. Some proverbs are quoted from Tleuberdi (2002).
- 7.
Demographic situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan in 2006, Agency on Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Internet Archive v. 11 October 2007).
- 8.
See Australia, Project SafeCom, Western. “Mongolian Gers or Yurts: heritage of nomadic peoples”. www.safecom.org.au; “ger (dwelling house) - Memidex dictionary/thesaurus”. www.memidex.com.
- 9.
As reported in Sarbassova (2015, p. 229) a set of Kazakh words referring to horses exceeds 600 forms, 358 of which define horse colour alone.
- 10.
- 11.
See https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/uk/monarchy-in-the-uk-the-royal-family-s-uncertain-future-1.3500174: “Haigh estimates that the monarchy generates about £1.8 billion for the British economy each year, far outstripping the £300–350 million it costs the state.[…] the monarchy enjoys solid popular support”.
References
Aasland, E. A. (2012). The Narrativization of Kazakh proverbs: College students’ language ideologies concerning “community”. Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Intercultural Studies. Ph.D. dissertation.
Abukhanova, A. G., & BurkhanovnaUtegaliyeva, B. (2013). Актуализация концептосферы «Материнство» в произведениях казахских поэтов. Uralsk: West Kazakhstan State University. https://library.wksu.kz/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_details&gid=5195&Itemid=71&lang=ru.
Abukhanova, A. G., & Burkhanovna Utegaliyeva, B. (2014). Метафорическое обогащение концептосферы «Материнство» в казахской и английской языковых картинах мира.Хабаршы/ Вестник ЗКГУ, Уральск, #2, (pp. 147–155). https://wksu.kz/images/stories/downloads/vestnik/4-5-6-2014.pdf.
Altayev, J. A. (1997). Development of philosophical thought in the Kazakh steppe. Almaty.
Amantay, Zh. B. (2012). Қазақ лингвомәдениетіндегі отбасы концептісінің қолданысы. Әл-Фараби атындағы Қазақ ұлттық университеті хабаршысы, Алматы, #4(61), (pp. 38–42). https://bulletin-orientalism.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-vostok/article/view/432/426.
Barlow, E. (2016). Modern day british family values. www.femalefirst.co.uk.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Press.
Hastings, A., & Manning, P. (2004). Introduction: Acts of Alterity. Language and Communication, 24(4), 291–311.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Ilimetova, A. (ИЛИМБЕТОВАm Азалия). (2007). Культконяубашкир.Turkolog. https://web.archive.org/web/20070316100334/http://turkolog.narod.ru/info/I20.htm.
Karibayeva, B. & Kunanbayeva, S. S. (2017). Power distance and verbal index in Kazakh business discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature (Online), 6(2), 8–13.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University Press.
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2007). Polysemy, prototypes, and radial categories. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (Eds.), The oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 139–169). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., & Tomaszczyk, J. (2012). We in the Union: A polish perspective on identity. In P. Bayley & G. Williams (Eds.), European identity: What the media say. (pp. 224–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., & Wilson, P. A. (2017). Shame and guilt across cultures. In Y. Y. Kim (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0260. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0260. Wiley Inc.
Makhambetov, O., Makazhanov, A., Yessenbayev, Zh., Matkarimov, B., Sabyrgaliyev, I. & A. Sharafudinov. (2013). Assembling the Kazakh language corpus. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, (pp. 1022–1031). Seattle, Washington, USA, October. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Mukanova, Z. (2013). Kinship and social identification in South-Eastern Kazakhstan: The relevance of patrilineal descent in economic and social life. Zurich: Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropoloy. CASCA.
Nezhina, T. G., Brudney, J. L., & Ibrayeva, A. R. (2008). Challenges of volunteer management in Kazakhstan. In M. Liao-Troth (Ed.), challenges in volunteer management. (pp. 151–173.). Information Age Publishing.
Nezhina, T. G., & Ibrayev, A. R. (2012). Explaining the role of culture and traditions in functioning of civil society organizations in Kazakhstan. Voluntas (pp. 1–24). International Society for Third-Sector Research and The John’s Hopkins University.
Sarbassova, G. (2015). Language and Identity in Kazakh Horse Culture. Bilig, 75, 227–248.
Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Tadmor, N. (2010). Early modern English kinship in the long run: Reflections on continuity and change. Special issue 1 (special issue on Kinship in Britain and beyond from the early modern to the present, Vol. 25, pp. 15–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tleuberdi, N. (2002). Kazakh nomad’s Blog: A Westerner’s view of Kazakhstan.https://kazakhnomad.wordpress.com/tag/tleuberdi-nusipbai/. Kazakh nomad’s Blog: A Westerner’s View of Kazakhstan. Kazakh Proverbs and their English Meanings.
Tursun, G. (2014). The national idea and mentality of Kazakhs in the context of the dialogue of culture. In Dinara Zhanabayeva & Moldagaliyev Bauyrzhan (Eds.), Kazakh culture challenges (pp. 3–12). Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Utegaliyeva, B. B. (2014). Лингвопрагматические особенности актуализации концептосферы «Материнство» в поэтических текстах на казахском и английском языках, MA thesis, Makhambet Utemisov West Kazakhstan State University, Kazakhstan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., Utegaliyeva, B.B. (2020). Kazakh Cultural Models of Family and Home in Contrast. In: Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (eds) Cultural Conceptualizations in Language and Communication. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42734-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42734-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42733-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42734-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)