Skip to main content

Imaging of Late Obstetrical and Post-partum Emergencies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emergency Imaging of Pregnant Patients

Abstract

The pregnant and post-partum patient introduces several diagnostic and imaging challenges. Choice of imaging modality is altered in order to reduce ionizing radiation to the fetus and to radiation-sensitive breast tissue. Even when using magnetic resonance imaging, the relative contraindication to the administration of intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agents in the pregnant patient also limits diagnostic accuracy and confidence. Furthermore, the relative inexperience of many radiologists in imaging the placenta, and the anatomic distortion of the gravid and post-partum uterus, makes evaluation of these patients difficult. Many of these emergencies and urgencies are unique to the pregnant or post-partum patient, and the radiologist must consider a wide range of pathologies. In this review, we present the imaging appearance of late obstetrical and post-partum emergencies and urgencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Creanga AA, Berg CJ, Ko JY, Farr SL, Tong VT, Bruce FC, et al. Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: where are we now? J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014;23(1):3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell KH, Savitz D, Werner EF, Pettker CM, Goffman D, Chazotte C, et al. Maternal morbidity and risk fo death at delivery hospitalization. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(3):627–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuklina E, Callaghan W. Chronic heart disease and severe obstetric morbidity among hospitalisations for pregnancy in the USA: 1995–2006. BJOG. 2011;118(3):345–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bateman BT, Bansil P, Hernandez-Diaz S, Mhyre JM, Callaghan WM, Kuklina EV. Prevalence, trends, and outcomes of chronic hypertension: a nationwide sample of delivery admissions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(2):134.e1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G, Dawson A, Drife J, Garrod D, et al. Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. BJOG. 2011;118:1–203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion No. 656: guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(2):e75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McCollough CH, Schueler BA, Atwell TD, Braun NN, Regner DM, Brown DL, et al. Radiation exposure and pregnancy: when should we be concerned? Radiographics. 2007;27(4):909–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mettler FA. Medical effects and risks of exposure to ionising radiation. J Radiol Prot. 2012;32(1):N9–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsai R, Raptis D, Raptis C, Mellnick VM. Complications after gynecologic and obstetric procedures: a pictorial review. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018;47(3):189–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Raptis CA, Mellnick VM, Raptis DA, Kitchin D, Fowler KJ, Lubner M, et al. Imaging of trauma in the pregnant patient. Radiographics. 2014;34(3):748–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Khandelwal A, Fasih N, Kielar A. Imaging of acute abdomen in pregnancy. Radiol Clin N Am. 2013;51(6):1005–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Andersen B, Nielsen TF. Appendicitis in pregnancy: diagnosis, management and complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78(9):758–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharp HT. The acute abdomen during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;45(2):405–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cappell MS, Friedel D. Abdominal pain during pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2003;32(1):1–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Woodfield CA, Lazarus E, Chen KC, Mayo-Smith WW, et al. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(6_Suppl):WS14–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gude NM, Roberts CT, Kalionis B, King RG. Growth and function of the normal human placenta. Thromb Res. 2004;114(5–6):397–407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Elsayes KM, Trout AT, Friedkin AM, Liu PS, Bude RO, Platt JF, et al. Imaging of the placenta: a multimodality pictorial review. Radiographics. 2009;29(5):1371–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D, Saade GR. Fetal imaging workshop invited participants. Fetal imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33(5):745–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grobman WA, Gersnoviez R, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Pregnancy outcomes for women with placenta previa in relation to the number of prior cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(6):1249–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Hallak M, Hershkowitz R, Katz M, Mazor M. Placenta previa: obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2001;10(6):414–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa–placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(1):210–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dawson WB, Dumas MD, Romano WM, Gagnon R, Gratton RJ, Mowbray RD. Translabial ultrasonography and placenta previa: does measurement of the os-placenta distance predict outcome? J Ultrasound Med. 1996;15(6):441–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith RS, Lauria MR, Comstock CH, Treadwell MC, Kirk JS, Lee W, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography for all placentas that appear to be low-lying or over the internal cervical os. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9(1):22–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oyelese Y, Smulian JC. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(4):927–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moodley J, Ngambu N, Corr P. Imaging techniques to identify morbidly adherent placenta praevia: a prospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore). 2004;24(7):742–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Oyelese KO, Turner M, Lees C, Campbell S. Vasa previa: an avoidable obstetric tragedy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1999;54(2):138–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schachter M, Tovbin Y, Arieli S, Friedler S, Ron-El R, Sherman D. In vitro fertilization is a risk factor for vasa previa. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(3):642–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Oyelese Y, Catanzarite V, Prefumo F, Lashley S, Schachter M, Tovbin Y, et al. Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(5, Part 1):937–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Swank ML, Garite TJ, Maurel K, Das A, Perlow JH, Combs CA, et al. Vasa previa: diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(2):223.e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Riteau A-S, Tassin M, Chambon G, Le Vaillant C, de Laveaucoupet J, Quéré M-P, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94866.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion. Placenta accreta. Number 266, January 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;77(1):77–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dwyer BK, Belogolovkin V, Tran L, Rao A, Carroll I, Barth R, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: sonography or magnetic resonance imaging? J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27(9):1275–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Comstock CH, Love JJ, Bronsteen RA, Lee W, Vettraino IM, Huang RR, et al. Sonographic detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(4):1135–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Warshak CR, Eskander R, Hull AD, Scioscia AL, Mattrey RF, Benirschke K, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(3, Part 1):573–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ananth CV, Wilcox AJ. Placental abruption and perinatal mortality in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153(4):332–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Oyelese Y, Ananth CV. Placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(4):1005–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Glantz C, Purnell L. Clinical utility of sonography in the diagnosis and treatment of placental abruption. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21(8):837–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Masselli G, Brunelli R, Di Tola M, Anceschi M, Gualdi G. MR imaging in the evaluation of placental abruption: correlation with sonographic findings. Radiology. 2011;259(1):222–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ananth CV, Berkowitz GS, Savitz DA, Lapinski RH. Placental abruption and adverse perinatal outcomes. JAMA. 1999;282(17):1646–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Trop I, Levine D. Hemorrhage during pregnancy. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(3):607–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fadl SA, Linnau KF, Dighe MK. Placental abruption and hemorrhage—review of imaging appearance. Emerg Radiol. 2019;26(1):87–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Desforges JF, Pearlman MD, Tintinalli JE, Lorenz RP. Blunt trauma during pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1990;323(23):1609–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wei SH, Helmy M, Cohen AJ. CT evaluation of placental abruption in pregnant trauma patients. Emerg Radiol. 2009;16(5):365–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Fujiwara T, Togashi K, Yamaoka T, Nakai A, Kido A, Nishio S, et al. Kinematics of the uterus: cine mode MR imaging. Radiographics. 2004;24(1):e19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Farmer RM, Kirschbaum T, Potter D, Strong TH, Medearis AL. Uterine rupture during trial of labor after previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(4):996–1001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yap OWS, Kim ES, Laros RK. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after uterine rupture in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(7):1576–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gardeil F, Daly S, Turner MJ. Uterine rupture in pregnancy reviewed. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994;56(2):107–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Turner MJ. Uterine rupture. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;16(1):69–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Motomura K, Ganchimeg T, Nagata C, Ota E, Vogel JP, Betran AP, et al. Incidence and outcomes of uterine rupture among women with prior caesarean section: WHO multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44093.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Ofir K, Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M. Uterine rupture: risk factors and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(4):1042–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Brown HL. Trauma in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(1):147–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. El Kady D, Gilbert WM, Anderson J, Danielsen B, Towner D, Smith LH. Trauma during pregnancy: an analysis of maternal and fetal outcomes in a large population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(6):1661–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Gibbons JM, Paley WB. The incarcerated gravid uterus. Obstet Gynecol. 1969;33(6):842–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Van Winter JT, Ogburn PL, Ney JA, Hetzel DJ. Uterine incarceration during the third trimester: a rare complication of pregnancy. Mayo Clin Proc. 1991;66(6):608–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Barton-Smith P, Kent A. Asymptomatic incarcerated retroverted uterus with anterior sacculation at term. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;96(2):128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. van Beekhuizen HJ, Bodewes HW, Tepe EM, Oosterbaan HP, Kruitwagen R, Nijland R. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of incarceration of the gravid uterus. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(5 Pt 2):1134–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gardner CS, Jaffe TA, Hertzberg BS, Javan R, Ho LM. The incarcerated uterus: a review of MRI and ultrasound imaging appearances. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(1):223–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Fernandes DD, Sadow CA, Economy KE, Benson CB. Sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings in uterine incarceration. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(4):645–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Plunk M, Lee JH, Kani K, Dighe M. Imaging of postpartum complications: a multimodality review. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(2):W143–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Menard MK, Main EK, Currigan SM. Executive summary of the reVITALize initiative. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(1):150–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice bulletin No. 183. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4):e168–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller A-B, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Pacagnella RC, Souza JP, Durocher J, Perel P, Blum J, Winikoff B, et al. A systematic review of the relationship between blood loss and clinical signs. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57594.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Maggio L, Hauspurg AK, Sperling JD, Chauhan SP, et al. Prevention and management of postpartum hemorrhage: a comparison of 4 national guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):76.e1–76.e10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. van den Bosch T, Daemen A, Van Schoubroeck D, Pochet N, De Moor B, Timmerman D. Occurrence and outcome of residual trophoblastic tissue: a prospective study. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27(3):357–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Malvern J, Campbell S, May P. Ultrasonic scanning of the puerperal uterus following secondary postpartum haemorrhage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1973;80(4):320–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Atri M, Rao A, Boylan C, Rasty G, Gerber D. Best predictors of grayscale ultrasound combined with color Doppler in the diagnosis of retained products of conception. J Clin Ultrasound. 2011;39(3):122–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Sellmyer MA, Desser TS, Maturen KE, Jeffrey RB, Kamaya A. Physiologic, histologic, and imaging features of retained products of conception. Radiographics. 2013;33(3):781–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Alcázar JL, Baldonado C, Laparte C. The reliability of transvaginal ultrasonography to detect retained tissue after spontaneous first-trimester abortion, clinically thought to be complete. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6(2):126–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Matijevic R, Knezevic M, Grgic O, Zlodi-Hrsak L. Diagnostic accuracy of sonographic and clinical parameters in the prediction of retained products of conception. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28(3):295–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kamaya A, Petrovitch I, Chen B, Frederick CE, Jeffrey RB. Retained products of conception: spectrum of color Doppler findings. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28(8):1031–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Sibai BM. Diagnosis, controversies, and management of the syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(5, Part 1):981–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Abildgaard U, Heimdal K. Pathogenesis of the syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (HELLP): a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;166(2):117–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Pelage JP, Le Dref O, Soyer P, Jacob D, Kardache M, Dahan H, et al. Arterial anatomy of the female genital tract: variations and relevance to transcatheter embolization of the uterus. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172(4):989–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Isono W, Tsutsumi R, Wada-Hiraike O, Fujimoto A, Osuga Y, Yano T, et al. Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm after cesarean section: case report and literature review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(6):687–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Prieto-Nieto MI, Perez-Robledo JP, Rodriguez-Montes JA, Garci-Sancho-Martin L. Acute appendicitis-like symptoms as initial presentation of ovarian vein thrombosis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004;18(4):481–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Ortín X, Ugarriza A, Espax RM, Boixadera J, Llorente A, Escoda L, et al. Postpartum ovarian vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2005;93(5):1004–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Kominiarek MA, Hibbard JU. Postpartum ovarian vein thrombosis: an update. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2006;61(5):337–56. 8p

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Själander A, Jansson J-H, Bergqvist D, Eriksson H, Carlberg B, Svensson P. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical inpatients: a meta-analysis. J Intern Med. 2008;263(1):52–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Mwickier D, Setiawan AT, Evans RS, Erdman WA, William Stettier R, Brown CEL, et al. Imaging of puerperal septic thrombophlebitis: prospective comparison of MR imaging, CT, and sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169(4):1039–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Maharaj D. Puerperal pyrexia: a review. Part I. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007;62(6):393–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief. 2010;35:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Zuckerman J, Levine D, McNicholas MM, Konopka S, Goldstein A, Edelman RR, et al. Imaging of pelvic postpartum complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168(3):663–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Eisenkop SM, Richman R, Platt LD, Paul RH. Urinary tract injury during cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;60(5):591–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Yossepowitch O, Baniel J, Livne PM. Urological injuries during cesarean section: intraoperative diagnosis and management. J Urol. 2004;172(1):196–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Obarisiagbon EO, Olagbuji BN, Onuora VC, Oguike TC, Ande ABA. Iatrogenic urological injuries complicating obstetric and gynaecological procedures. Singap Med J. 2011;52(10):738–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Chan JK, Morrow J, Manetta A. Prevention of ureteral injuries in gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(5):1273–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Narasimhulu DM, Egbert NM, Matthew S. Intrapartum spontaneous ureteral rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(3):610–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Phipps MG, Watabe B, Clemons JL, Weitzen S, Myers DL. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(1):156–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Rajasekar D, Hall M. Urinary tract injuries during obstetric intervention. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(6):731–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Lee JS, Choe JH, Lee HS, Seo JT. Urologic complications following obstetric and gynecologic surgery. Korean J Urol. 2012;53(11):795.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Rodgers SK, Kirby CL, Smith RJ, Horrow MM. Imaging after cesarean delivery: acute and chronic complications. Radiographics. 2012;32(6):1693–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

The authors have no relevant financial disclosures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tsai, R., Sondgeroth, K., Ludwig, D.R., Mellnick, V.M. (2020). Imaging of Late Obstetrical and Post-partum Emergencies. In: Patlas, M., Katz, D., Scaglione, M. (eds) Emergency Imaging of Pregnant Patients. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42722-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42722-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42721-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42722-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics