Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Emergency Imaging of the Pregnant Patient: General Principles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Emergency Imaging of Pregnant Patients

Abstract

Emergent and traumatic scenarios are experienced by a non-trivial portion of the pregnant population. Complex physiologic changes in pregnancy, from expected elevated normal ranges in blood work, to the gravid uterus confounding physical examination findings, complicate accurate diagnosis. Physiologic changes experienced by the pregnant patient places her at increased risk for potential complications. Imaging examinations are crucial for the assessment and management of emergent medical conditions in pregnancy. Due to the potential risk of radiation exposure on the fetus, typical imaging techniques such as computed tomography are limited in their use for only select clinical scenarios, and require special consideration to minimize effects on the fetus. Due to the lack of ionizing radiation, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging play a vital role in the work up of the pregnant patient in the emergency department. By understanding the complex physiologic changes experienced by the pregnant patient in common emergency scenarios, as well as imaging considerations for the fetus, we aim to clarify the utilization of imaging examinations in the emergency evaluation of the pregnant patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. CDC. NVSS - birth data. 2019. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/births.htm. Accessed 23 Feb 2019.

  2. Magriples U, Kershaw TS, Rising SS, et al. Prenatal health care beyond the obstetrics service: utilization and predictors of unscheduled care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:75.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mendez-Figueroa H, Dahlke JD, Vrees RA, Rouse DJ. Trauma in pregnancy: an updated systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hill CC, Pickinpaugh J. Trauma and surgical emergencies in the obstetric patient. Surg Clin North Am. 2008;88:421–40. viii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Kady D, Gilbert WM, Anderson J, et al. Trauma during pregnancy: an analysis of maternal and fetal outcomes in a large population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1661–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Connolly AM, Katz VL, Bash KL, et al. Trauma and pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 1997;14:331–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown HL. Trauma in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:147–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Augustin G, Majerovic M. Non-obstetrical acute abdomen during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;131:4–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heit JA, Kobbervig CE, James AH, et al. Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: a 30-year population-based study. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:697–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hill CC, Pickinpaugh J. Physiologic changes in pregnancy. Surg Clin North Am. 2008;88:391–401. vii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Petrone P, Marini CP. Trauma in pregnant patients. Curr Probl Surg. 2015;52:330–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oelkers WK. Effects of estrogens and progestogens on the renin-aldosterone system and blood pressure. Steroids. 1996;61:166–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koller O. The clinical significance of hemodilution during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1982;37:649–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Troiano NH. Physiologic and hemodynamic changes during pregnancy. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2018;29:273–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanghavi M, Rutherford JD. Cardiovascular physiology of pregnancy. Circulation. 2014;130:1003–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. West CA, Sasser JM, Baylis C. The enigma of continual plasma volume expansion in pregnancy: critical role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016;311:F1125–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. de Haas S, Ghossein-Doha C, van Kuijk SMJ, et al. Physiological adaptation of maternal plasma volume during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49:177–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fujitani S, Baldisseri MR. Hemodynamic assessment in a pregnant and peripartum patient. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:S354–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Elliott CG. Evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. J Thorac Imaging. 2012;27:3–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ismail S, Wong C, Rajan P, Vidovich MI. ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy: 2016 update. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40:399–406.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Appleby CE, Barolet A, Ing D, et al. Contemporary management of pregnancy-related coronary artery dissection: a single-centre experience and literature review. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2009;14:e8–e16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Elkus R, Popovich J. Respiratory physiology in pregnancy. Clin Chest Med. 1992;13:555–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Costantine MM. Physiologic and pharmacokinetic changes in pregnancy. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee S-Y, Chien D-K, Huang C-H, et al. Dyspnea in pregnancy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56:432–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Farman JV, Thorpe ME. Static compliance before and after vaginal delivery. Br J Anaesth. 1971;43:418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Plowman RS, Javidan-Nejad C, Raptis CA, et al. Imaging of pregnancy-related vascular complications. Radiographics. 2017;37:1270–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tan EK, Tan EL. Alterations in physiology and anatomy during pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27:791–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bouyou J, Gaujoux S, Marcellin L, et al. Abdominal emergencies during pregnancy. J Visc Surg. 2015;152:S105–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Faúndes A, Brícola-Filho M, Pinto e Silva JL. Dilatation of the urinary tract during pregnancy: proposal of a curve of maximal caliceal diameter by gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:1082–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheung KL, Lafayette RA. Renal physiology of pregnancy. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2013;20:209–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Bailey RR, Rolleston GL. Kidney length and ureteric dilatation in the puerperium. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1971;78:55–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rasmussen PE, Nielsen FR. Hydronephrosis during pregnancy: a literature survey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1988;27:249–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Haber MA, Nunez D. Imaging neurological emergencies in pregnancy and puerperium. Emerg Radiol. 2018;25:673–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jain C. ACOG committee opinion no. 723: guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Brent RL, Mettler FA. Pregnancy policy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:819–22. author reply 822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Patel SJ, Reede DL, Katz DS, et al. Imaging the pregnant patient for nonobstetric conditions: algorithms and radiation dose considerations. Radiographics. 2007;27:1705–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gjelsteen AC, Ching BH, Meyermann MW, et al. CT, MRI, PET, PET/CT, and ultrasound in the evaluation of obstetric and gynecologic patients. Surg Clin North Am. 2008;88:361–90. vii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ray JG, Schull MJ, Urquia ML, et al. Major radiodiagnostic imaging in pregnancy and the risk of childhood malignancy: a population-based cohort study in Ontario. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000337.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Tremblay E, Thérasse E, Thomassin-Naggara I, Trop I. Quality initiatives: guidelines for use of medical imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Radiographics. 2012;32:897–911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Solomou G, Papadakis AE, Damilakis J. Abdominal CT during pregnancy: a phantom study on the effect of patient centring on conceptus radiation dose and image quality. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:911–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chatterson LC, Leswick DA, Fladeland DA, et al. Fetal shielding combined with state of the art CT dose reduction strategies during maternal chest CT. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83:1199–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis. Radiology. 2004;232:347–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Abramowicz JS. Benefits and risks of ultrasound in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol. 2013;37:295–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Abramowicz JS, Barnett SB, Duck FA, et al. Fetal thermal effects of diagnostic ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:541–59. quiz 560–563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Diegelmann L. Nonobstetric abdominal pain and surgical emergencies in pregnancy. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2012;30:885–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Baruch Y, Canetti M, Blecher Y, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tirada N, Dreizin D, Khati NJ, et al. Imaging pregnant and lactating patients. Radiographics. 2015;35:1751–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sadro C, Bernstein MP, Kanal KM. Imaging of trauma: part 2, abdominal trauma and pregnancy — a radiologist’s guide to doing what is best for the mother and baby. Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:1207–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Leung AN, Bull TM, Jaeschke R, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology clinical practice guideline: evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:1200–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Spalluto LB, Woodfield CA, DeBenedectis CM, Lazarus E. MR imaging evaluation of abdominal pain during pregnancy: appendicitis and other nonobstetric causes. Radiographics. 2012;32:317–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Patenaude Y, Pugash D, Lim K, et al. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the obstetric patient. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36:349–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Nanxi Zha & Michael N. Patlas

  2. NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA

    Douglas S. Katz

Authors
  1. Nanxi Zha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael N. Patlas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Douglas S. Katz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael N. Patlas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hamilton General Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Michael N. Patlas

  2. Department of Radiology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA

    Douglas S. Katz

  3. Department of Radiology, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy

    Mariano Scaglione

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zha, N., Patlas, M.N., Katz, D.S. (2020). Emergency Imaging of the Pregnant Patient: General Principles. In: Patlas, M., Katz, D., Scaglione, M. (eds) Emergency Imaging of Pregnant Patients. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42722-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42722-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42721-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42722-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation