Skip to main content

Limits of Distributed Dislocations in Geometric and Constitutive Paradigms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geometric Continuum Mechanics

Part of the book series: Advances in Mechanics and Mathematics ((ACM,volume 43))

Abstract

The 1950s foundational literature on rational mechanics exhibits two somewhat distinct paradigms to the representation of continuous distributions of defects in solids. In one paradigm, the fundamental objects are geometric structures on the body manifold, e.g., an affine connection and a Riemannian metric, which represent its internal microstructure. In the other paradigm, the fundamental object is the constitutive relation; if the constitutive relations satisfy a property of material uniformity, then it induces certain geometric structures on the manifold. In this paper, we first review these paradigms, and show that they are equivalent if the constitutive model has a discrete symmetry group (otherwise, they are still consistent; however, the geometric paradigm contains more information). We then consider bodies with continuously distributed edge dislocations, and show, in both paradigms, how they can be obtained as homogenization limits of bodies with finitely many dislocations as the number of dislocations tends to infinity. Homogenization in the geometric paradigm amounts to a convergence of manifolds; in the constitutive paradigm it amounts to a Γ-convergence of energy functionals. We show that these two homogenization theories are consistent, and even identical in the case of constitutive relations having discrete symmetries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Strictly speaking, the intrinsic condition is that \(\mathcal {G}_p\) is discrete for some \(p\in \mathcal {M}\) (and therefore for every \(p\in \mathcal {M}\)). By locally flat, we mean that the curvature tensor vanishes; globally flat implies also a trivial holonomy. Note that the term flat has a different interpretation in [36], where it describes a curvature- and torsion-free connection.

  2. 2.

    This proposition is a more general version of [36, Proposition 11.8].

  3. 3.

    Actually, any map \(\phi :T_p\mathcal {M}\to \mathcal {M}\) with ϕ(0) = p whose differential at the origin is the identity will do.

  4. 4.

    The estimate (11) does not appear in this corollary explicitly; it follows from its fourth part, using the fact a small triangle on \(\mathcal {M}\) with edges that are Levi-Civita geodesics is, to leading order, Euclidean (this follows from standard triangle comparison results).

  5. 5.

    In [19, Section 3.2], choosing θ = o(1), d = o(1∕n) implies, in the notation of [19], n −1 ≪ D ≪ 1, which then implies L convergence (see the proof of [19, Proposition 2]). The general case is very similar, since we are only considering minuscule pieces of the manifolds, in which the only geometry that plays a role is the structure of the singular points (everything else is uniformly close to the trivial Euclidean plane). See also [20, Section 2.3.2, Example 2].

  6. 6.

    The quasiconvexity assumption is natural from a variational point of view, as it guarantees the existence of an energy minimizer of the functional; see also Remark 6.

References

  1. H.I. Arcos, and J.G. Pereira, Torsion Gravity: a Reappraisal, International Journal of Modern Physics D 13 (2004), no. 10, 2193–2240.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. B.A. Bilby, R. Bullough, and E. Smith, Continuous distributions of dislocations: A new application of the methods of Non-Riemannian geometry, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 231 (1955), 263–273.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Berger, A panoramic view of Riemannian geometry, Springer, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Cermelli and G. Leoni, Renormalized energy and forces on dislocations, SIAM journal on mathematical analysis 37 (2005), no. 4, 1131–1160.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. P.G. Ciarlet, Mathematical elasticity, volume 1: Three-dimensional elasticity, Elsevier, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Christodoulou and I. Kaelin, On the mechanics of crystalline solids with a continuous distribution of dislocations, Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 17 (2013), no. 2, 399–477.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Cheeger, W. Müller, and R. Schrader, On the curvature of piecewise flat spaces, Commun. Math. Phys. 92 (1984), 405–454.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Dacorogna, Direct methods in the calculus of variations, 2nd ed., Springer, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. dal Maso, An introduction to Γ-convergence, Birkhäuser, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Davini, A proposal for a continuum theory of defective crystals, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 96 (1986), 295–317.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Dolzmann, Regularity of minimizers in nonlinear elasticity – the case of a one-well problem in nonlinear elasticity, Technische Mechanik 32 (2012), 189–194.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Dyer, G. Vegter, and M. Wintraecken, Riemannian simplices and triangulations, Geometriae Dedicata 179 (2015), 91–138.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Elżanowski, M. Epstein, and J. Śniatycki, G-structures and material homogeneity, Journal of Elasticity 23 (1990), no. 2, 167–180.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Epstein and R. Segev, Geometric aspects of singular dislocations, Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids 19 (2014), no. 4, 337–349.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. _________ , Geometric theory of smooth and singular defects, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 66 (2014), 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Garroni, G. Leoni, and M. Ponsiglione, Gradient theory for plasticity via homogenization of discrete dislocations, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 12 (2010), 1231–1266.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, New general relativity, Physica D 19 (1979), 3524–3553.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. M. O. Katanaev, Geometric theory of defects, UFN 175 (2005), no. 7, 705–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Kupferman and C. Maor, The emergence of torsion in the continuum limit of distributed dislocations, J. Geom. Mech. 7 (2015), 361–387.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. _________ , Limits of elastic models of converging Riemannian manifolds, Calc. Variations and PDEs 55 (2016), 40.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. _________ , Riemannian surfaces with torsion as homogenization limits of locally-Euclidean surfaces with dislocation-type singularities, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 146A (2016), no. 4, 741–768.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. _________ , Variational convergence of discrete geometrically-incompatible elastic models, Calc. Var. PDEs 57 (2018), no. 2, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Kupferman and E. Olami, Homogenization of edge-dislocations as a weak limit of de-Rham currents, Geometric continuum mechanics. Advances in mechanics and mathematics (R. Segev and M. Epstein, eds.), Springer, New York, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42683-5_6.

  24. K. Kondo, Geometry of elastic deformation and incompatibility, Memoirs of the Unifying Study of the Basic Problems in Engineering Science by Means of Geometry (K. Kondo, ed.), vol. 1, 1955, pp. 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. Kröner, The dislocation as a fundamental new concept in continuum mechanics, Materials Science Research (H. H. Stadelmaier and W. W. Austin, eds.), Springer US, Boston, MA, 1963, pp. 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  26. _________ , The physics of defects, Les Houches Summer School Proceedings (Amsterdam) (R. Balian, M. Kleman, and J.-P. Poirier, eds.), North-Holland, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  27. _________ , Dislocation theory as a physical field theory, Meccanica 31 (1996), 577–587.

    Google Scholar 

  28. K. Kuwae and T. Shioya, Variational convergence over metric spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 360 (2008), no. 1, 35–75.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Lewicka and P. Ochoa, On the variational limits of lattice energies on prestrained elastic bodies, Differential Geometry and Continuum Mechanics (G.-Q. G. Chen, M. Grinfeld, and R. J. Knops, eds.), Springer, 2015, pp. 279–305.

    Google Scholar 

  30. W. Noll, A mathematical theory of the mechanical behavior of continuous media, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 2 (1958), 197–226.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. J.F. Nye, Some geometrical relations in dislocated crystals, Acta Met. 1 (1953), 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Ozakin and A. Yavari, Affine development of closed curves in Weitzenböck manifolds and the burgers vector of dislocation mechanics, Math. Mech. Solids 19 (2014), 299–307.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. J.A. Schouten, Ricci-calculus, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1954.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Šilhavý, Rank 1 convex hulls of isotropic functions in dimension 2 by 2, Math. Bohem. 126 (2001), 521–529.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. V. Volterra, Sur l’équilibre des corps élastiques multiplement connexes, Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. Paris 1907 24 (1907), 401–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. C.-C. Wang, On the geometric structures of simple bodies, a mathematical foundation for the theory of continuous distributions of dislocations, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 27 (1967), 33–93.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. R. Weitzenböck, Invariantentheorie, ch. XIII, Sec 7, Nordhoff, Groningen, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  38. A. Yavari and A. Goriely, Weyl geometry and the nonlinear mechanics of distributed point defects, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 468 (2012), 3902–3922.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was initiated in the Oberwolfach meeting “Material Theories” in July 2018. RK was partially funded by the Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 1035/17), and by a grant from the Ministry of Science, Technology and Space, Israel and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cy Maor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Epstein, M., Kupferman, R., Maor, C. (2020). Limits of Distributed Dislocations in Geometric and Constitutive Paradigms. In: Segev, R., Epstein, M. (eds) Geometric Continuum Mechanics. Advances in Mechanics and Mathematics(), vol 43. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42683-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics