Skip to main content

The Arctic Ocean: Are We Ready to Govern a New Ocean?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

Climate change makes the Arctic ocean accessible for a range of human activities, such as shipping or hydrocarbon extraction, which can severely damage the fragile natural environment. The emergence of a ‘new ocean’ raises the question whether existing international legal norms are sufficient to adequately govern the Arctic ocean in light of this changing situation. Looking at the work of existing institutions, initiatives by Arctic States and applicable legal norms, the authors investigate the suitability of the current international legal framework for the governance of the Arctic ocean in general and the protection of the marine environment in particular. In the absence of a regional seas agreement for the Arctic ocean, particular attention will be given to the work of the Arctic Council and to potential future developments of the international legal framework governing in particular the high seas part of the central Arctic ocean.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    402 United Nations Treaty Series 71, opened for signature on 1 December 1959 in Washington, D.C., entered into force on 23 June 1961.

  2. 2.

    Molenaar (2012), p. 558.

  3. 3.

    Byers (2013), pp. 134 et seq; Caminos and Cogliati-Bantz (2014), p. 140; US Department of State (1992), p. 73.

  4. 4.

    Canada, Act to Prevent Pollution of areas of the Arctic Waters Adjacent to the Mainland and Islands of the Canadian Arctic, June 1970, International Legal Materials 9 (1970), pp. 543–552.

  5. 5.

    §3 (1) AWPPA; Huebert (2001), p. 254. In 2009, Canada extended the scope of AWPPA from 100 to 200 nautical miles, Proelss et al. (2017), p. 1570.

  6. 6.

    Bartenstein (2011), p. 26; Franckx (1993), p. 87.

  7. 7.

    Id., p. 185.

  8. 8.

    1833 United Nations Treaty Series 3, opened for signature on 10 December 1982 in Montego Bay, Jamaica, entered into force on 16 November 1994.

  9. 9.

    Id., p. 186.

  10. 10.

    Overland et al. (2018).

  11. 11.

    NOAA (2019).

  12. 12.

    Gray (2018).

  13. 13.

    NOAA (2019).

  14. 14.

    Welch (2017).

  15. 15.

    See also Lei et al. (2015).

  16. 16.

    Art. 234 UNCLOS.

  17. 17.

    IMO Resolution A.982(24), Revised guidelines for the identification and designation of Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas (PSSAs).

  18. 18.

    Regional Seas Programmes, https://www.unenvironment.org/explore-topics/oceans-seas/what-we-do/working-regional-seas/regional-seas-programmes.

  19. 19.

    Polar Code (2016). MEPC 68/21/Add.1, Annex 10, http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/polar/Documents/POLAR%20CODE%20TEXT%20AS%20ADOPTED.pdf.

  20. 20.

    Arctic Council (2015).

  21. 21.

    Churchill and Lowe (1999), p. 335.

  22. 22.

    For a list of dangers see Polar Code, Introduction, Part 3.

  23. 23.

    See also Zojer (2018), p. 213.

  24. 24.

    Perovich et al. (2016); Serreze et al. (2007); Pollack (2010), p. xi.

  25. 25.

    Koivurova (2014), p. 102.

  26. 26.

    Deggim (2018), p. 16; Brigham (2017), pp. 6–9.

  27. 27.

    Kirchner and Kleemola-Juntunen (2018), p. 29. On the particular risks of oil spills in the Arctic see Wadhams (2017), pp. 99 et seq.

  28. 28.

    Bellefontaine and Johansson (2018), pp. 257 et seq.

  29. 29.

    Kirchner (2019), p. 86.

  30. 30.

    This is an issue that is not reflected in the Polar Code, which appears to treat bergy waters as open waters, see Polar Code, Part I-A, Chapter 12, para. 12.3.2.

  31. 31.

    Smith and Stephenson (2013); Humpert and Raspotnik (2012); Rothwell (2017), pp. 6 et seq.

  32. 32.

    Art. 234, UNCLOS.

  33. 33.

    CLCS (2009).

  34. 34.

    CLCS (2014). Canada is currently preparing a submission to the CLCS regarding the Arctic Ocean, see also Koivurova (2011).

  35. 35.

    DOALOS (2018).

  36. 36.

    Oude Elferink (2001), p. 156.

  37. 37.

    Alaska Fisheries Science Center (2001), Renner (2006), Palinkas et al. (1993) and Kirchner (2016).

  38. 38.

    Cf. Kirchner (2018).

  39. 39.

    Polar Code (2016).

  40. 40.

    See Kirchner and Alkanli (2011).

  41. 41.

    See Kirk and Miller (2018).

  42. 42.

    Proelss and Müller (2008), p. 684.

  43. 43.

    Art. 122, UNCLOS.

  44. 44.

    Pharand (2007), p. 53; Weidemann (2014), p. 84.

  45. 45.

    Permanent Court of Arbitration, The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China), Case 2013-19, Award of 12 July 2016, https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/2086.

  46. 46.

    Whomersley (2016), p. 241; referring to the maps on pp. 7 and 9 in Permanent Court of Arbitration, The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China), Case 2013-19, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of 29 October 2015, https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/1506, which highlight the distance of 200 nm from the coastal States’ coastlines.

  47. 47.

    Pharand (2007), p. 53; Weidemann (2014), pp. 84–85.

  48. 48.

    Convention Respecting Measures for the Preservation and Protection of Fur Seals and Sea Otters in the North Pacific Ocean, signed July 7, 1911, the Treaty text is available at the American Journal of International Law, Supplement Official documents 1911, Vol. 5 (4), p. 267.

  49. 49.

    Interim Convention between the United States of America, Canada, Japan and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on conservation of North Pacific fur seals, signed 9 February 1957, entered into force 14 October 1957, 314 UNTS 106; Agreement on the Conservation of Polar Bears signed 15 November 1973, entered into force 26 May 1976, 2898 UNTS 243.

  50. 50.

    The Inuvialuit-Inupiat Polar Bear Management Agreement is not an international treaty but an agreement between indigenous peoples in two countries (United States and Canada).

  51. 51.

    Agreement to Prevent Unregulated High Seas Fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean, 3 October 2018, text available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/GA/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018PC0454.

  52. 52.

    Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, signed 4 August 1995, entered into force 11 December 2001, 2167 UNTS 3.

  53. 53.

    Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (1995).

  54. 54.

    Arctic Council (1996).

  55. 55.

    Ibid.

  56. 56.

    Molenaar (2012), p. 579.

  57. 57.

    Id., p. 580.

  58. 58.

    Koivurova (2010), p. 148.

  59. 59.

    Id., pp. 149–150.

  60. 60.

    Cf. Koivurova (2010).

  61. 61.

    Agreement to Prevent Unregulated High Seas Fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean (CAOFA) (2018).

  62. 62.

    Agreement on Cooperation on Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue in the Arctic (Arctic SAR), 12 May 2011, entered into force 19 January 2013, 50 ILM 1113 (2011).

  63. 63.

    Agreement on Enhancing International Arctic Scientific Cooperation, 11 May 2017, entered into force 23 May 2018, https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/1916.

  64. 64.

    Agreement on Cooperation on Marine Oil Pollution Preparedness and Response in the Arctic, 15 May 2013, entered into force 25 March 2016, https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/529.

  65. 65.

    Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment (AMSA) 2009 Report, https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/54.

  66. 66.

    AMSA (2009), p. 6.

  67. 67.

    Scott and VanderZwaag (2017), p. 736.

  68. 68.

    CAMLR Convention (1980).

  69. 69.

    Ilulissat Declaration (2008), https://cil.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/2008-Ilulissat-Declaration.pdf.

  70. 70.

    Schatz et al. (2018).

  71. 71.

    Ibid.

  72. 72.

    Ibid.

  73. 73.

    Ibid.

  74. 74.

    De Lucia et al. (2018), p. 265.

  75. 75.

    Cf. Louis-Jacques (2012).

  76. 76.

    Roach (2018).

  77. 77.

    See Koivurova and Caddell (2018), pp. 134–138; De Lucia et al. (2018), p. 264; cf. also Thiele (2018).

  78. 78.

    IISD (2018).

  79. 79.

    Kirchner (2017), p. 137. On the concept see Nugroho (2012).

  80. 80.

    On the establishment of potential Arctic PSSAs see McCreath and Brigham (2018), pp. 313 et seq.

  81. 81.

    IMO Resolution A.982(24), Revised guidelines for the identification and designation of Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas (PSSAs).

  82. 82.

    Id.

  83. 83.

    Arctic Council (2009).

  84. 84.

    See e.g. Arctic Council (2013).

  85. 85.

    Arctic Council (2017), para. 12; cf. De Lucia et al. (2018), p. 265.

  86. 86.

    Kirchner and Kleemola-Juntunen (2018), p. 34.

  87. 87.

    Byers (2013), p. 189.

  88. 88.

    International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments (2004).

  89. 89.

    At the time of writing (early 2019), Canada, Norway, Sweden and Russia have acceded to the BWM Convention. Finland has accepted the Convention while neither the United States nor Iceland are parties to it. Denmark has acceded to the BWM Convention but at the same time declared that the BWM Convention would not apply to Greenland (the simultaneous declaration that the BWM Convention would not apply to Faroyar was withdrawn in 2015), IMO (2019), pp. 517 et seq. The example of the BWM Convention highlights that shared challenges do no not necessarily lead to joint approaches among the Arctic States.

  90. 90.

    De Lucia et al. (2018), p. 265.

References

  • Alaska Fisheries Science Center (2001) The Exxon Valdez oil spill: how much oil remains. In: AFSC Quarterly Research Reports, July–September 2001. Available via http://www.afsc.noaa.gov/Quarterly/jas2001/feature_jas01.htm

  • Bartenstein K (2011) The ‘Arctic Exception’ in the Law of the Sea Convention: a contribution to safer navigation in the Northwest Passage? Ocean Dev Int Law 42:22–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellefontaine N, Johansson TM (2018) Arctic oil spill intervention. In search of an integrated approach for the high seas. In: Hildebrand LP, Brigham LW, Johansson TM (eds) Sustainable shipping in a changing Arctic. Springer, Cham, pp 255–273

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brigham LW (2017) The changing maritime Arctic and new marine operations. In: Beckman RC, Henriksen T, Kraabel KD, Molenaar EJ, Roach JA (eds) Governance of Arctic shipping: balancing rights and interests of Arctic states and user states. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers M (2013) International law and the Arctic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caminos H, Cogliati-Bantz VP (2014) The legal regime of straits: contemporary challenges and solutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill RR, Lowe AV (1999) The law of the sea. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lucia V, Prip C, Dalaker Kraabel K, Primicerio R (2018) Arctic marine biodiversity in the high seas between regional and global governance. Arctic Rev Law Polit 9:164–166. Available via https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/1470/2858

  • Deggim H (2018) The international code for ships operating in polar waters. In: Hildebrand LP, Brigham LW, Johansson TM (eds) Sustainable shipping in a changing Arctic. Springer, Cham, pp 15–35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Franckx E (1993) Maritime claims in the Arctic: Canadian and Russian perspectives. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray E (2018) Unexpected future boost of methane possible from Arctic permafrost, 20 August 2018. Available via https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2785/unexpected-future-boost-of-methane-possible-from-arctic-permafrost/

  • Huebert R (2001) Article 234 and marine pollution jurisdiction in the Arctic. In: Oude Elferink AG, Rothwell DR (eds) The law of the sea and polar maritime delimitation and jurisdiction. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp 249–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Humpert M, Raspotnik A (2012) The future of Arctic shipping along the transpolar sea route. Arctic Yearb 1:281–307. Available via https://arcticyearbook.com/arctic-yearbook/2012/2012-scholarly-papers/20-the-future-of-arctic-shipping-along-the-transpolar-sea-route

  • IISD (2018) Summary of the First Session of the Intergovernmental Conference on an International Legally Binding Instrument under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction, 4–17 September 2018|UN Headquarters, New York. In: Earth Negotiations Bulletin 25:179, 20 September 2018. Available via http://enb.iisd.org/vol25/enb25179e.html

  • Kirchner S (2016) Multiple risks and limited law: compensation for oil spills in the context of long-term damages to Arctic coastal communities. Ocean Yearb 30:267–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner S (2017) The future of the central Arctic Ocean: protection through international law. J Territorial Maritime Stud 4:135–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner S (2018) Beyond the Polar Code: enhancing seafarer safety along the northern sea route. J Siberian Fed Univ Humanit Soc Sci 3(11):365–373. Available via http://elib.sfu-kras.ru/bitstream/handle/2311/70746/03_Kirchner.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  • Kirchner S (2019) Legal approaches to dry cargo liquefaction: an Arctic perspective on a global problem. J Territorial Maritime Stud 6:85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner S, Alkanli D (2011) Die Deepwater Horizon-Katastrophe aus seevölkerrechtlicher Sicht. Studentische Zeitschrift für Rechtswissenschaft/Heidelberg Student Law Rev 8:215–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner S, Kleemola-Juntunen P (2018) Dumping and oil pollution: regulatory approaches for vessel operations in an ice-free Central Arctic Ocean. Rev Eur Comp Int Environ Law 27:28–34. Available via https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/reel.12246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk EA, Miller RG (2018) Offshore oil & gas installations in the Arctic: responding to uncertainty through science and law. Arctic Yearb. Available via https://arcticyearbook.com/images/yearbook/2018/Scholarly_Papers/15_AY2018_Kirk.pdf

  • Koivurova T (2010) Limits and possibilities of the Arctic Council in a rapidly changing scene of Arctic governance. Polar Record 46:146–156. Available via https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247409008365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivurova T (2011) The actions of the Arctic states respecting the continental shelf: a reflective essay. Ocean Dev Int Law 42:211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivurova T (2014) Introduction to international environmental law. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivurova T, Caddell R (2018) Managing biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction in the changing Arctic. AJIL Unbound 112:134–138. Available via https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2018.44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei R, Xie H, Wang J, Leppäranta M, Jónsdóttir I, Zhang Z (2015) Changes in sea ice conditions along the Arctic Northeast Passage from 1979 to 2012. In: Cold Regions Science and Technology 119:132–144. Available via http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165232X15001743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis-Jacques L (2012) The Titanic disaster and international law. Law News, 14 April 2012. Available via http://news.lib.uchicago.edu/blog/2012/04/14/the-titanic-disaster-and-international-law/

  • McCreath M, Brigham LW (2018) Challenges for the establishment of marine protected areas in response to Arctic marine operations and shipping. In: Hildebrand LP, Brigham LW, Johansson TM (eds) Sustainable shipping in a changing Arctic. Springer, Cham, pp 297–322

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar EJ (2012) Current and prospective roles of the Arctic Council System within the context of the law of the sea. Int Mar Coast Law 27:553–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nugroho HB (2012) The Particularly Sensitive Sea Area (PSSA): history and development. In: Nordquist MH, Moore JN, Soons AAH, Kim H-S (eds) The Law of the Sea Convention - U.S. accession and globalization. Martinus Nijhoff Brill, Leiden, pp 529–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Oude Elferink AG (2001) The Outer Continental Shelf in the Arctic: the application of Article 76 of the UNCLOS in a regional context. In: Oude Elferink AG, Rothwell DR (eds) The law of the sea and polar maritime delimitation and jurisdiction. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp 139–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Overland J, Dunlea E, Box JE, Corell R, Forsius M, Kattsov V, Skovgård Olsen M, Pawlak J, Reiersen L-O, Wang M (2018) The urgency of Arctic change. Polar Sci, accepted manuscript, preprint. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2018.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palinkas L, Downs M, Petterson J, Russell J (1993) Social, cultural, and psychological impacts of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Hum Organ 52:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perovich D, Meier W, Tschudi M, Farrell S, Gerland S, Hendricks S, Krumpen T, Haas C (2016) Arctic Report Card: Update for 2016 — persistent warming trend and loss of sea ice are triggering extensive Arctic changes, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Arctic Program, 22 December 2016. Available via http://arctic.noaa.gov/Report-Card/Report-Card-2016/ArtMID/5022/ArticleID/286/Sea-Ice

  • Pharand D (2007) The Arctic waters and the Northwest Passage: a final revisit. Ocean Dev Int Law 38:3–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack H (2010) A world without ice. Avery, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Proelss A, Müller T (2008) The legal regime of the Arctic Ocean. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht/Heidelberg J Int Law 68:651–687. Available via http://www.zaoerv.de/68_2008/68_2008_3_a_651_688.pdf

  • Proelss A, Maggio AR, Blitza E, Daum O (2017) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: commentary. CH Beck/Hart/Nomos, Munich/Oxford/Baden-Baden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Renner R (2006) Long-term effects of Exxon Valdez - are there lingering problems from one of the world’s worst oil spills? Anal Chem:2091–2021

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach JA (2018) Beyond the Polar Code: IMO measures for assuring safe and environmentally sound Arctic navigation. In: Hildebrand LP, Brigham LW, Johansson TM (eds) Sustainable shipping in a changing Arctic. Springer, Cham, pp 51–71

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell D (2017) Arctic Ocean Shipping - navigation, security and sovereignty in the North American Arctic. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz V, Proelss A, Liu N (2018) The 2018 Agreement to prevent unregulated high seas fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean: a primer, EJIL Talk!, 26 October 2018. Available via http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-2018-agreement-to-prevent-unregulated-high-seas-fisheries-in-the-central-arctic-ocean-a-primer/

  • Scott KN, VanderZwaag DL (2017) Polar oceans and the law of the sea. In: Rothwell DR, Oude Elferink AG, Scott KN, Stephens T (eds) The Oxford handbook of the law of the sea. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 724–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Serreze MC, Holland MM, Stroeve J (2007) Perspectives on the Arctic’s shrinking sea-ice cover. Science 315(5818):1533–1536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139426. Available via http://science.sciencemag.org/content/315/5818/1533.full

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith LC, Stephenson SR (2013) New Trans-Arctic shipping routes navigable by midcentury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(13):E1191–E1195. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214212110. http://www.pnas.org/content/110/13/E1191.full

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele T (2018) Arctic high seas governance of biodiversity. In: Hildebrand LP, Brigham LW, Johansson TM (eds) Sustainable shipping in a changing Arctic. Springer, Cham, pp 227–239

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wadhams P (2017) A farewell to ice - a report from the Arctic. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidemann L (2014) International governance of the Arctic marine environment: with particular emphasis on high seas fisheries. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Welch C (2017) Half of all species are on the move—and we’re feeling it, National Geographic News, 27 April 2017. Available via https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/04/climate-change-species-migration-disease/

  • Whomersley C (2016) The South China Sea: the award of the tribunal in the case brought by Philippines against China—a critique. Chin J Int Law 15:239–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Zojer G (2018) The role of hydrocarbon development in Arctic governance: a suitable approach to human development in the region? In: Hossain K, Roncero Martín JM, Petrétei A (eds) Human and societal security in the circumpolar Arctic. Brill, Leiden, pp 212–242

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Documents

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timo Koivurova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Koivurova, T., Kirchner, S., Kleemola-Juntunen, P. (2020). The Arctic Ocean: Are We Ready to Govern a New Ocean?. In: Ribeiro, M., Loureiro Bastos, F., Henriksen, T. (eds) Global Challenges and the Law of the Sea. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42670-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42671-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics