Skip to main content

International Organizations and the Protection of the Marine Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Global Challenges and the Law of the Sea
  • 996 Accesses

Abstract

One response to the numerous governance challenges faced with respect to the oceans, a shared space, is the creation of international organizations. Typically comprising of representations from member States and with pre-defined mandates, international organizations strive to resolve specific issues. This chapter will provide a categorical overview of these organizations and examine how they operate in isolation, as well as interact with each other, in striving to protect the marine environment. Given the institutional complexity surrounding the individual regimes that create them, the outcomes arrived at by most international organizations occasionally do not represent the collective interests of all member States. Nevertheless, the existence of a common avenue in which marine environmental problems can be raised and discussed as a whole has indeed resulted in the adoption of notable measures to address those problems. Such outcomes would not have been possible without the mechanics that are peculiar to international organizations. Ultimately, this analysis demonstrates the extent to which international organizations formulate the law of the sea and discern some patterns on how their efforts has advanced the protection of the marine environment in recent years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rothwell and Stephens (2016), p. 517; Redgwell (2006), pp. 180–182.

  2. 2.

    Boyle (2007) and Stephens (2009).

  3. 3.

    Art. 136, UNCLOS.

  4. 4.

    Markus and Singh (2016).

  5. 5.

    Art. 145, UNCLOS.

  6. 6.

    Rothwell and Stephens (2016), pp. 20–21.

  7. 7.

    Jaeckel (2017), Lodge (2015a, b), Makgill and Linhares (2016) and Wedding et al. (2013).

  8. 8.

    Franckx (2010).

  9. 9.

    Annex II, Article 2, UNCLOS. See also Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (2018).

  10. 10.

    Jenisch (2010).

  11. 11.

    Tanaka (2015a), p. 34.

  12. 12.

    Rothwell and Stephens (2016), p. 21.

  13. 13.

    Harrison (2015a), pp. 389–390.

  14. 14.

    Churchill and Lowe (1999), p. 22.

  15. 15.

    Boyle and Chinkin (2007), pp. 106–108; Tanaka (2015a), p. 347.

  16. 16.

    See UNGA (2015) Resolution A/RES/70/1.

  17. 17.

    Bodansky (2010).

  18. 18.

    See UNGA (2017) Resolution A/RES/69/292.

  19. 19.

    Barnes (2016).

  20. 20.

    Tanaka (2015a), p. 36.

  21. 21.

    See UNGA (1999) Resolution A/RES/54/33.

  22. 22.

    Tanaka (2015a), p. 36.

  23. 23.

    de La Fayette (2006).

  24. 24.

    Rothwell and Stephens (2016), p. 366.

  25. 25.

    Churchill and Lowe (1999), p. 23.

  26. 26.

    de La Fayette (2001).

  27. 27.

    Karim (2015), p. 34; Tanaka (2015a), p. 35; Kachel (2008), pp. 86–90.

  28. 28.

    Birnie et al. (2009), pp. 76 and 404; IMO (2014), p. 8.

  29. 29.

    VanderZwaag (2015), p. 143.

  30. 30.

    Churchill and Lowe (1999), p. 23.

  31. 31.

    Boyle (2006), p. 50.

  32. 32.

    Tanaka (2015a), p. 36.

  33. 33.

    World Heritage Convention and UNESCO (2018).

  34. 34.

    Harden-Davies (2016), p. 261; Rothwell and Stephens (2016), pp. 573–574.

  35. 35.

    Ivanova (2007).

  36. 36.

    UNEP (2018).

  37. 37.

    Pfeiffer (2006), p. 197.

  38. 38.

    Braethan (1998), p. 29.

  39. 39.

    Willetts (2011), pp. 72–73.

  40. 40.

    See Order 2013/2 dated 24 May 2013, Case No. 21 of ITLOS (Request for an Advisory Opinion Submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission).

  41. 41.

    UNEP (2018).

  42. 42.

    Namely, the Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution 1976 (Barcelona Convention), the Regional Convention for Cooperation on the Protection of the Marine Environment from Pollution 1978 (Kuwait Convention), the Convention for Cooperation in the Protection, Management and Development of the Marine and Coastal Environment of the Atlantic Coast of the West, Central and Southern Africa Region 1981 (Abidjan Convention), the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and Coastal Zones of the South-East Pacific 1981 (Lima Convention), the Regional Convention for the Conservation of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Environment 1982 (Jeddah Convention), the Convention for the Protection and Development of the Marine Environment of the Wider Caribbean Region 1983 (Cartagena Convention), the Convention of the Protection, Management and Development of the Marine and Coastal Environment of the Eastern African Region 1985, (Nairobi Convention), the Convention for the Protection of the Natural Resources and Environment of the South Pacific Region 1986 (Noumea Convention), the Convention on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution 1992 (Bucharest Convention), and the Convention for Cooperation in the Protection and Sustainable Development of the Marine and Coastal Environment of the North-East Pacific 2002 (Antigua Convention).

  43. 43.

    Such as the East Asian Seas Action Plan (EASAP), Northwest Pacific Action Plan 1994 (NOWPAP), and the South Asian Seas Action Plan 1995 (SASAP).

  44. 44.

    Freestone and Salman (2007), p. 349.

  45. 45.

    Notably, the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea 1992 (Helsinki Convention), the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic 1992 (OSPAR Convention), the Framework Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Caspian Sea 2003 (Tehran Convention), and the Antarctic Treaty System (comprising of the Antarctic Treaty 1959, the Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Seals 1972, the Convention for the Conservation of the Antarctic Marine Living Resources 1980, and the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty 1991).

  46. 46.

    Rayfuse (2015), p. 440.

  47. 47.

    Unterweger (2015).

  48. 48.

    Rayfuse (2015), p. 450.

  49. 49.

    Harrison (2011), p. 233.

  50. 50.

    Harrison (2015b), p. 69; Hulm (1983), p. 4; Haas (1989).

  51. 51.

    Oral (2015), pp. 361–362.

  52. 52.

    Churchill and Lowe (1999), pp. 23–24.

  53. 53.

    Molenaar (2003).

  54. 54.

    Gillespie (2011), p. 446.

  55. 55.

    Palma-Robles (2016), pp. 151–152.

  56. 56.

    Gillespie (2005).

  57. 57.

    Sielen (2009).

  58. 58.

    Boyle (2005).

  59. 59.

    Harrison (2011), pp. 237–242.

  60. 60.

    Bodansky (2010), p. 35.

  61. 61.

    Van Dyke and Broder (2015), pp. 69–71.

  62. 62.

    Boetius and Matthias (2018).

  63. 63.

    International Institute for Sustainable Development (2017).

  64. 64.

    Accordingly, upon greater reflection, the granting of a mineral exploration license in that part of the Area might not be contrary to its status as an EBSA, provided a license for exploitation is not granted over the said area subsequently. Given the status of the area as an EBSA, it seems to be unlikely that the ISA will eventually grant an exploitation license over that area.

  65. 65.

    Gillespie (2002).

  66. 66.

    Williamson et al. (2012), Markus and Ginzky (2011), Scott (2013) and IMO (2019).

  67. 67.

    Wolfrum and Matz (2003), pp. 159–175.

  68. 68.

    Hey (2007), p. 753.

  69. 69.

    de La Fayette (2006), p. 74.

  70. 70.

    Boyle (2006), pp. 61–62.

  71. 71.

    Franckx (1998), p. 322; Redgwell (2007), p. 923.

  72. 72.

    Churchill and Lowe (1999), p. 24.

  73. 73.

    Tanaka (2015b), p. 53.

  74. 74.

    Rothwell (2007), p. 1023.

References

  • Barnes R (2016) The proposed LOSC implementation agreement on areas beyond national jurisdiction and its impact on international fisheries law. Int J Mar Coast Law 31:1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnie P, Boyle A, Redgwell C (2009) International law and the environment, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodansky D (2010) The art and craft of international environmental law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Boetius A, Matthias H (2018) Mind the seafloor. Science 359:34–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle A (2005) Further development of the Law of the Sea Convention: mechanisms for change. Int Comp Law Q 54:563–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle A (2006) Further development of the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea: mechanisms for change. In: Freestone D, Barnes R, Ong DM (eds) The law of the sea: progress and prospects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 40–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle A (2007) The environmental jurisprudence of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Int J Mar Coast Law 22(3):369–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle A, Chinkin C (2007) The law making of international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Braethan J (1998) International co-operation on fisheries and environment. TemaNord, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill R, Lowe V (1999) The law of the sea, 3rd edn. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • de La Fayette L (2001) The Marine Environment Protection Committee: the conjunction of the law of the sea and international environmental law. Int J Mar Coast Law 16(2):155–238

    Google Scholar 

  • de La Fayette L (2006) The role of the United Nations in international ocean governance. In: Freestone D, Barnes R, Ong DM (eds) The law of the sea: progress and prospects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 63–74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Franckx E (1998) Regional marine environment protection regimes in the context of UNCLOS. Int J Mar Coast Law 13:307–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franckx E (2010) The International Seabed Authority and the Common Heritage of Mankind: the need for States to establish the outer limits of their continental shelf. Int J Mar Coast Law 25(4):543–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freestone D, Salman SMA (2007) Ocean and freshwater resources. In: Bodansky D, Brunee J, Hey E (eds) The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 337–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie A (2002) Forum shopping in international environmental law: the IWC, CITES, and the management of cetaceans. Ocean Dev Int Law 33:17–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie A (2005) Whaling diplomacy: defining issues in international environmental law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie A (2011) Conservation, biodiversity and international law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haas P (1989) Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. Int Organ 43:377–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harden-Davies H (2016) Marine science and technology transfer: can the International Oceanographic Commission advance governance of biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction. Mar Policy 74:260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison J (2011) Making the law of the sea: a study in the development of international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison J (2015a) The law of the sea convention institutions. In: Rothwell D et al (eds) The Oxford handbook on the law of the sea. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 373–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison J (2015b) Actors and institutions for the protection of the marine environment. In: Rayfuse R (ed) Research handbook on international marine environmental law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 57–80

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hey E (2007) International institutions. In: Bodansky D, Brunee J, Hey E (eds) The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 749–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulm P (1983) The regional seas program: what fate for UNEP’s crown jewels. Ambio 12:2–13

    Google Scholar 

  • International Institute for Sustainable Development (2017) International Seabed Authority: 23rd session highlights. Earth Negot Bull 25:145. Available at http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb25145e.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova M (2007) Designing the United Nations Environment Programme: a story of compromise and confrontation. Integr Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econ 7(4):337–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeckel A (2017) The International Seabed Authority and the precautionary principle. Brill, Leiden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jenisch U (2010) Renaissance des meeresbodens: mineralische rohstoffe und seerecht–Teil 1. NordÖR 10:373–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachel M (2008) Particularly sensitive sea areas: the IMO’s role in protecting vulnerable marine areas. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karim MS (2015) Prevention of pollution of the marine environment from vessels: the potential and limits of the International Maritime Organization. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge M (2015a) The deep seabed. In: Rothwell D et al (eds) The Oxford handbook on the law of the sea. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 226–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge M (2015b) Protecting the marine environment of the deep seabed. In: Rayfuse R (ed) Research handbook on international marine environmental law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 151–169

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Makgill R, Linhares AP (2016) Deep seabed mining: key obligations in the emerging regulation of exploration and development in the Pacific. In: Warner R, Kaye S (eds) Routledge handbook of maritime regulation and enforcement. Routledge, New York, pp 231–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus T, Ginzky H (2011) Regulating climate engineering: paradigmatic aspects of the regulation of ocean fertilization. Carbon Clim Law Rev 5(4):477–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus T, Singh P (2016) Promoting consistency in the deep seabed: addressing regulatory dimensions in designing the International Seabed Authority’s exploitation code. Rev Eur Comp Int Environ Law 25(3):347–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar EJ (2003) Participation, allocation and unregulated fishing: the practice of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations. Int J Mar Coast Law 18:457–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oral N (2015) Forty years of the UNEP Regional Seas Programme: from past to future. In: Rayfuse R (ed) Research handbook on international marine environmental law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 339–362

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Palma-Robles MA (2016) Fisheries enforcement and the concept of compliance and monitoring, control and surveillance. In: Warner R, Kaye S (eds) Routledge handbook of maritime regulation and enforcement. Routledge, New York, pp 139–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer S (2006) The International Hydrographic Organization (IHO): how to successfully modernize an international organisation. In: Ehlers P, Lagoni R (eds) International maritime organisations and their contribution towards a sustainable marine development. Lit Verlag, Hamburg, pp 197–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayfuse R (2015) Regional fisheries management organizations. In: Rothwell D et al (eds) The Oxford handbook on the law of the sea. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 439–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Redgwell C (2006) From permission to prohibition: the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea and protection of the marine environment. In: Freestone D, Barnes R, Ong DM (eds) The law of the sea: progress and prospects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 180–191

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Redgwell C (2007) National implementation. In: Bodansky D, Brunee J, Hey E (eds) The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 922–946

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell D (2007) The contribution of ITLOS to ocean governance through marine environmental dispute resolution. In: Ndiaye TM, Wolfrum R (eds) Law of the sea, environmental law and settlement of disputes: liber amicorum Judge Thomas A. Mensah. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, pp 1007–1024

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell D, Stephens T (2016) The international law of the sea, 2nd edn. Hart Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott K (2013) Regulating ocean fertilization under international law. Carbon Clim Law Rev 7(2):108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sielen A (2009) The new international rules on ocean dumping: promise and performance. Georgetown Int Environ Law Rev 21(2):295–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens T (2009) International courts and environmental protection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka Y (2015a) The international law of the sea, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka Y (2015b) Principles of international marine environmental law. In: Rayfuse R (ed) Research handbook on international marine environmental law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 31–56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Unterweger I (2015) International law on tuna fisheries management: is the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission ready for the challenge? Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke JM, Broder SP (2015) International agreements and customary international principles providing guidance for national and regional ocean policies. In: Cicin-Sain B, VanderZwaag DL, Balgos MC (eds) Routledge handbook of national and regional ocean policies. Routledge, Oxon, pp 49–84

    Google Scholar 

  • VanderZwaag DL (2015) The international control of ocean dumping: navigating from permissive to precautionary shores. In: Rayfuse R (ed) Research handbook on international marine environmental law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 132–140

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wedding LM et al (2013) From principles to practice: a spatial approach to systematic conservation planning in the deep sea. Proc R Soc B 280:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willetts P (2011) Non-governmental organizations in world politics: the construction of global governance. Routledge, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson P et al (2012) Ocean fertilization for geoengineering: a review of effectiveness, environmental impacts and emerging governance. Process Saf Environ Prot 90(6):475–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfrum R, Matz N (2003) Conflicts in international environmental law. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

Documents

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeep A. Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Singh, P.A. (2020). International Organizations and the Protection of the Marine Environment. In: Ribeiro, M., Loureiro Bastos, F., Henriksen, T. (eds) Global Challenges and the Law of the Sea. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42670-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42671-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics