Skip to main content

Entrepreneurability: Innovation Labs as Engines of Innovation Capacity Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Innovative Entrepreneurship in Action

Part of the book series: International Studies in Entrepreneurship ((ISEN,volume 45))

Abstract

In the current political-economic scenario, creativity and innovation are increasingly considered the key to organizations’ survival. Innovation is a high-risk process that hides various uncertainty factors and several barriers. The key challenge is how to innovate successfully and cope with the pace of innovation, rather than deciding if it is worth innovating or not. We use the notion of entrepreneurability to refer to organizations and individuals’ ability to develop an innovation capacity. In particular, this chapter aims to investigate the role of Innovation Laboratories (Innovation Labs) as an engine of entrepreneurability, e.g., of innovation capacity development. The chapter introduces an understanding of what an Innovation Lab is. It acknowledges that, in recent years, many organizations are experimenting with different forms of labs, centers of competence, and more generally initiatives to boost innovation capacity. Defining the notion of Innovation Lab aims to provide managers with a conceptual framework to understand, from a descriptive and a prescriptive viewpoint, the setup of organizational units and initiatives for innovation capacity development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabile, T.M. (1983) The Social Psychology of Creativity. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, T., & Hermann, S. (2010). Innovative Dienstleistungen aus dem Labor. In GI Jahrestagung (1) (pp. 89–95).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, V., Davies, M., & Zhang, S. (2016). An online immersive reality innovation-lab. iLRN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro A (2000) How does knowledge management influence innovation and competitiveness? Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2):87–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S. T., Calantone, R. J., & Zhao, Y. (2003). Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. Journal of business & industrial marketing, 18(1): 6–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.). (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cong, X., & Pandya, K. V. (2003). Issues of knowledge management in the public sector. Electronic journal of knowledge management,1(2):25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Darroch J. (2005). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3):101–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, M. (2007). The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4): 20–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Lowe, A. (2002). Management research: An introduction. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fecher, F., Winding, J., Hutter, K., & Füller, J. (2018). Innovation labs from a participants’ perspective. Journal of Business Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, G. (2001) Lab Practicals. FX: Design, Business and Society, February, 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gey, R., Meyer, L. P., &Thieme, M. (2013, September). A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon Innovation Laboratory: A Structurational Viewpoint. In Proceedings of the XXIII International RESER Conference, Aix en Provence, France (pp. 1–17).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjimanolis, A. (1999). Barriers to innovation for SMEs in a small less developed country (Cyprus). Technovation, 19(9), 561–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hii, J., & Neely, N. (2000). Innovative capacity of firms: on why some firms are more innovative than others. Paper presented at the 7th International Annual EurOMA Conference 2000, Ghent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. J. (2011). What is an innovation ecosystem. National Science Foundation, 1(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, P., & Lewis, A. (2007). How award-winning SMEs manage the barriers to innovation. Creativity and innovation management, 16(2), 142–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M., & Moultrie, J. (2005). The organizational innovation laboratory. Creativity and innovation management, 14(1), 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madrid-Guijarro, A., Garcia, D., & Van Auken, H. (2009). Barriers to innovation among Spanish manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 465–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magadley, W., & Birdi, K. (2009). Innovation labs: an examination into the use of physical spaces to enhance organizational creativity. Creativity and innovation management, 18(4), 315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín‐de‐Castro, G., Navas‐López, J. E., López‐Sáez, P., & Alama‐Salazar, E. (2006). Organizational capital as competitive advantage of the firm. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(3), 324–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabani S. E., & Shajari, M. (2012). Knowledge management and innovation capacity. Management Research, 4(2):164

    Google Scholar 

  • Memon, A. B., Meyer, K., Thieme, M., & Meyer, L. P. (2018). Inter-InnoLab collaboration: An investigation of the diversity and interconnection among Innovation Laboratories. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 47, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, J. (1993). Theory building through conceptual methods. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13(5), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L. P. (2014). Innovation Laboratories Worldwide: Insights Gathered Through the Analysis of the Representation in the World Wide Web. Universität Leipzig, Inst. Für Angewandte Informatik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A., & Hii, J. (2014). The innovative capacity of firms. Nang Yan Business Journal, 1(1), 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford university press. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, D. S., Phillips, F., Park, S., Lee E (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation 54, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo, D. I., & Ahmed, P. K. (2006). Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management, 36(5), 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S., Brinks, V., &Brinkhoff, S. (2014). Innovation and creativity labs in Berlin. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 58(1), 232–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szeto, E. (2000). Innovation capacity: working towards a mechanism for improving innovation within an inter‐organizational network. The TQM Magazine, 12(2):149–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Industrial and corporate change, 3(3), 537–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, J. (2000). The Competence Cycle: Translating Knowledge. From knowledge management to strategic competence: Measuring technological, market and organizational innovation, 3, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thieme, M., & Meyer, K. (2011, March). Innovation through collaboration: a case-study based strategy to connect research institutions and enterprises. In SRII Global Conference (SRII), 2011 Annual (pp. 622–629). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomer, J. F. (1987). Organizational capital: The path to higher productivity and well-being. Newyork: Praeger publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Goolen, R., Evers, H., &Lammens, C. (2014). International Innovation Labs: An innovation meeting ground between SMEs and business schools. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 184–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied psychology, 51(3), 355–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Santarsiero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Santarsiero, F., Schiuma, G., Carlucci, D. (2020). Entrepreneurability: Innovation Labs as Engines of Innovation Capacity Development. In: Passiante, G. (eds) Innovative Entrepreneurship in Action. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 45. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42538-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics