Skip to main content

Corporate “Excelerators”: How Organizations Can Speed Up Crowdventuring for Exponential Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Innovative Entrepreneurship in Action

Part of the book series: International Studies in Entrepreneurship ((ISEN,volume 45))

Abstract

The emergence of exponential technologies, along with the affirmation of a collective intelligence paradigm, is creating new competitive pressures and entrepreneurial opportunities for organizations aiming to generate a spectrum of diverse outputs ranging from product innovation to large-scale corporate renewal. The entrepreneurial process designed and realized within the organization has traditionally been referred to as corporate entrepreneurship. Today, the affirmation of open innovation and the increasing role of employee creativity and initiative as drivers of innovation and entrepreneurship activities in companies are giving rise to a new concept of “crowdventuring.” In particular, exponential organizations, which are able to leverage disruptive technologies to create socioeconomic value, are well positioned in the emerging competitive scenario. Based on a number of internal and external drivers, these organizations can excel within their markets operating as Excelerators, i.e., organizations where people can think and act differently, embrace radical change, and create more sustainable outcomes. This chapter describes the evolution towards crowdventuring and presents the attributes of exponential organizations that act as entrepreneurial accelerators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Moore’s law is the observation that the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit doubles about every 2 years. The observation is named after Gordon Moore, the cofounder of Fairchild Semiconductor and CEO of Intel, whose 1965 paper described a doubling every year in the number of components per integrated circuit and projected this rate of growth would continue for at least another decade. In 1975, looking forward to the next decade, he revised the forecast to doubling every 2 years, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 41.4% (www.wikipedia.org).

  2. 2.

    Since 2009, SU has been building a global community of industry, government, and academic stakeholders in more than 127 countries, with over 5000 initiatives aimed to drive positive change in the areas of health, environment, security, education, energy, food, prosperity, water, space, disaster resilience, shelter, and governance.

  3. 3.

    The book builds on ideas introduced by the same author in the volumes The Age of Intelligent Machines (1990) and The Age of Spiritual Machines (1999) and embraces the concept of “singularity,” which was popularized by Vernor Vinge in his 1993 essay (book?) The Coming Technological Singularity.

  4. 4.

    Abundance of opportunities, information, innovation potential, and human creativity.

References

  • Adler, B.M., Baets, W.R.J., and König, R. (2011) “A complexity perspective on collaborative decision making in organizations: the ecology of group-performance”, Information and Management, 48, 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T.J. (2004) “Integrating decentralized strategy making and strategic planning processes in dynamic environments”, Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1271–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T.J. (2015) “Interactive strategy-making: Combining central reasoning with ongoing learning from decentralized responses”, Journal of General Management, 40(4), 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T.J., and Hallin, C.A. (2017) Global Strategic Responsiveness: Exploiting Frontline Information in the Adaptive Multinational Enterprise (Strategy Matters – Series). Routledge, Oxon, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Antoncic, B., and Hisrich, R.D. (2004) “Corporate entrepreneurship contingencies and organizational wealth creation”, Journal of Management Development, 23(6), 518–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baets, W.R.J. (2006) Complexity, Learning and Organizations: A Quantum Interpretation of Business, Routledge, Oxon, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A. (1983) “A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 223–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A. (1996) “A process model of strategic business exit: Implications for an evolutionary perspective on strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1), 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A., and Grove, A.S. (2007) “Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos—repeatedly: managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity”, Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 965–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte (2018) Exponential Technologies in Manufacturing. Transforming the Future of Manufacturing through Technology, Talent, and the Innovation Ecosystem. Deloitte Development LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • dos Santos, R., and Spann, M. (2011) “Collective entrepreneurship at Qualcomm: combining collective and entrepreneurial practices to turn employee ideas into action”, R&D Management, 41(5), 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elia, G., and Margherita, A. (2018) “Assessing the maturity of crowdventuring for corporate entrepreneurship”, Business Horizons, 61(2), 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodburn, M. (2015) “What is the life expectancy of your company?” World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, C.A., Andersen, T, J., and Tveterås, S. (2017) “Harnessing the frontline employee sensing of capabilities for decision support”, Decision Support Systems, 97, 104–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayton J.C., and Kelley D.J. (2006) “A competency-based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurs”, Human Resource Management, 45(3), 407–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, J.C. (2005) “Promoting corporate entrepreneurship through HRM practices: a review of empirical research”, Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby J.S., Kuratko D.F., and Zahra S.A. (2002) “Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale”, Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, J.S., Holt, D.T., and Kuratko, D.F. (2008) “The dynamic nature of corporate entrepreneurship: Assessing the CEAI”, Academy of Management Proceedings, 2008(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R.D., Covin, J.G., and Kuratko, D.F. (2009) “Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, S. (2014) Exponential Organizations: Why New Organizations are Ten Times Better, Faster, and Cheaper than Yours (and What to Do About it), Singularity University Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junni, P., Sarala, R.M., Taras, V., and Tarba, S.Y. (2013) “Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis”, Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanbach, D.K., and Stubner, S. (2016) “Corporate accelerators as recent form of startup engagement: The what, the why, and the how”, Journal of Applied Business Research, 32, 1761–1776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, T. (2016) “Corporate accelerators: Building bridges between corporations and startups”, Business Horizons, 59(3), 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko D.F., Hornsby J.S., and Covin J.G. (2014) “Diagnosing a firm’s internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship”, Business Horizons, 57(1), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko D.F., Montagno R.V., and Hornsby J.S. (1990) “Developing an intrapreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial environment”, Strategic Management Journal, 11(5), 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil, R. (1990) The Age of Intelligent Machines, MIT Press, Cambridge (USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil, R. (1999) The Age of Spiritual Machines, Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil, R. (2005) The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, Penguin Group, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud-Jouini, S. B., Duvert, C., and Esquirol, M. (2018) “Key Factors in Building a corporate accelerator capability: Developing an effective corporate accelerator requires close attention to the relationships between startups and the sponsoring company”, Research-Technology Management, 61(4), 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. (1991) “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning”, Organization Science, 2, 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margherita, A., and Caforio, A. (2017), Process Mindset. Aracne, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margherita, A., and Secundo, G. (2009) “Density, diversity, openness and speed: Is management development aligned?”, Journal of Management Development, 28(10), 933–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., and Waters, J. A. (1985). Of Strategies Deliberate and Emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschner, S. L., Fink, A. A., Kurpjuweit, S., Wagner, S. M., and Herstatt, C. (2019). Toward a better understanding of corporate accelerator models. Business Horizons. 62(5), 637–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R., and Berger, D. (1972) “Entrepreneurship in Organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 16: 97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, M.W., and Holt, D.T. (2007) “Corporate entrepreneurship. An empirical look at the innovativeness dimension and its antecedents”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(3), 429–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmelter, R., Mauer, R., Börsch, C., and Brettel, M. (2010) “Boosting corporate entrepreneurship through HRM practices: Evidence from German SMEs”, Human Resource Management, 49(4), 715–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. 1983. [1912] The Theory of Economic Development, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, R.K., and Shepherd, D.A. (2018) “Accelerating strategic fit or venture emergence: Different paths adopted by corporate accelerators”, Journal of Business Venturing, 34(5), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soleimani, M., and Shahnazari, A. (2013) “Studying effective factors on corporate entrepreneurship: Representing a model”, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(4), 1309–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somech, A., and Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013) “Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: the role of team composition and climate for innovation”, Journal of Management, 39(3), 684–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, N. and Agrawal, A. (2010) “Factors supporting corporate entrepreneurship: an exploratory study”, VISION - The Journal of Business Perspective, 14(3), 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. Y. (2005) "Critical success factors for implementing knowledge management in small and medium enterprises". Industrial Management and Data Systems, 105(3), 261-279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Margherita .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Margherita, A., Elia, G., Baets, W.R.J., Andersen, T.J. (2020). Corporate “Excelerators”: How Organizations Can Speed Up Crowdventuring for Exponential Innovation. In: Passiante, G. (eds) Innovative Entrepreneurship in Action. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 45. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42538-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics