Skip to main content

The Genome of Digital Entrepreneurship: A Descriptive Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Studies in Entrepreneurship ((ISEN,volume 45))

Abstract

The study of entrepreneurship literature has highlighted the presence of a number of antecedents of successful initiatives at individual, organizational, and ecosystem level. Such conditions assume more peculiar meaning, relevance, and dynamics in the context of technology-based ventures. In them, the entrepreneurial process is conceived, designed, and undertaken in a landscape of digital platforms and multi-stakeholder communities that interact within digital ecosystems. In such an endeavor, the objective of the chapter is to define the multiple meanings of digital entrepreneurship as well as the distinguishing features and “dimensions” of successful digital entrepreneurship. Using theory and practical evidence, a set of key success factors and enabling or facilitating conditions are extracted and organized along a process-based view showing the different stages and steps of the entrepreneurial roadmap. The study is undertaken using a combined desk, premarket, and market view of the entrepreneurial process. The final purpose is to derive the digital entrepreneurship “genome” as well as the key activities for its effective management. While a genome is an organism’s complete set of DNA, including all of its genes, and contains all of the information needed to build and maintain that organism, the idea of the digital entrepreneurship genome is to identify and classify the DNA of successful digital entrepreneurship. This is done by providing an initial reference framework useful for further theory and practitioner development. In theory, the study can be a knowledge platform for investigating the antecedents for the success of digital entrepreneurship. Meanwhile, for practitioners, the chapter provides a reference guide and management checklist to design and implement more effective initiatives aimed to facilitate, nurture, and develop successful entrepreneurial processes in digital settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antoncic, B. and Prodan, I. (2008) Alliances, corporate technological entrepreneurship and firm performance: testing a model on manufacturing firms, Technovation, 28(5), 257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auerswald, P.E. (2014). Enabling entrepreneurial ecosystems. In D. Audretsch, A. Link, and M. Walshok (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of local competitiveness. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borangiu, T., Trentesaux, D., Thomas, A., Leitão, P., & Barata, J. (2019). Digital transformation of manufacturing through cloud services and resource virtualization. Computers in Industry, 108, 150–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., and Mason, C. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, T. H., Dorf, R. C. and Nelson, A. J. (2010). Technology ventures: From idea to enterprise. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems, Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B., Hall, B., & Wood, C. (2017). Data Localization Laws and Their Impact on Privacy, Data Security and the Global Economy. Antitrust Law Journal, 32(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, F. S., Morgan, M., & Patrinos, A. (2003). The human genome project: Lessons from large-scale biology. Science, 300, 286–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • dos Santos, R., & Spann, M. (2011). Collective entrepreneurship at Qualcomm: combining collective and entrepreneurial practices to turn employee ideas into action. R&D Management, 41(5), 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B., & Christensen, C. (2008). Entrepreneur behaviors, opportunity recognition, and the origins of innovative ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(4), 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekbia, H.R. (2009). Digital Artifacts as Quasi-Objects: Qualification, Mediation, and Materiality, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (60:12), 2554–2566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfring, T. and Hulsink, W. (2003) Networks in entrepreneurship: the case of high-technology firms, Small Business Economics, 21(4), 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elia, G., Li, X., Margherita, A., & Petti, C. (2017). Human-oriented corporate entrepreneurship: An integrative framework of creativity and HRM enablers. European Business Review, 29(4), 386–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elia, G., Margherita, A. (2016) A Collective Intelligence Platform for Developing Technology Entrepreneurship Ecosystems, in Passiante G. and Romano A. (Eds.) “Creating Technology-Driven Entrepreneurship: Foundations, Processes and Environments,” Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 195–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia, G., Margherita, A., Petti, C. (2016) An Operational Model to Develop Technology Entrepreneurship EGO-SYSTEM, Special Issue on “Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship: Dynamics and Impact,” International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 13(5), 1640008

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2015). Digital Transformation of European Industry and Enterprises, available at http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/9462/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native

  • European Commission (2017). Digital Transformation Scoreboard 2017, available at https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/dem/monitor/scoreboard

  • Ford, S., Garnsey, E., & Probert, D. (2010). Evolving corporate entrepreneurship strategy: technology incubation at Philips. R&D Management, 40(1), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawer, A., and Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giones, F., and Brem, A. (2017). Digital Technology Entrepreneurship: A Definition and Research Agenda. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafeez, K., Alghatas, F. M., Foroudi, P., Nguyen, B., & Gupta, S. (2019). Knowledge sharing by entrepreneurs in a virtual community of practice (VCoP). Information Technology & People, 32(2), 405–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 479–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosu, I., and Iancu, I. (Eds.). (2016). Digital Entrepreneurship and Global Innovation. IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. E., Caisy Hung, Y. T., Hair, N., Perotti, V., & DeMartino, R. (2007). Taking advantage of digital opportunities: a type of digital entrepreneurship. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 4(3), 290–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, June, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., and Marton, A. (2013). The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 37(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. and Von Burgh, U. (1999) Technology, entrepreneurship and path dependence: industrial clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1), 67–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., and Hann, I. (2013). Does crowdfunding democratize access to capital? A geographical analysis. INFORMS Conference on Information Systems and Technology (CIST), Arlington, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (2012). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Courier Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koellinger, P. D., van der Loos, M. J., Groenen, P. J., Thurik, A. R., Rivadeneira, F., van Rooij, F. J., Uitterlinden, A. G. & Hofman, A. (2010). Genome-wide association studies in economics and entrepreneurship research: promises and limitations. Small Business Economics, 35(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, T., & Chesbrough, H. (2019). From collaborative community to competitive market: the quest to build a crowdsourcing platform for social innovation. R&D Management, 49(3), 356–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S., Palmer, C., Kailer, N., Kallinger, F. and Spitzer, J. (2019), Digital entrepreneurship, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 353–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmer, M. (2012). Transformational entrepreneurship: Where technology meets societal impact. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S. (2016). Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., and Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M., and Choudary, S.P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy–and how to make them work for you. New York: W.W. Norton Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petti, C., & Zhang, S. (2011). Explaining technological innovation in Chinese enterprises: Insights from technological entrepreneurship. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 5(3), 452–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan, P., & Foo, M. 2004. Technological entrepreneurship in emerging regions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(s1): 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezazadeh, A., & Nobari, N. (2018). Antecedents and consequences of cooperative entrepreneurship: A conceptual model and empirical investigation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 479–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Urbano, D. (2009). Overview of collaborative entrepreneurship: an integrated approach between business decisions and negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 18(5), 419–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Beckmann, M., & Hockerts, K. (2018). Collaborative entrepreneurship for sustainability. Creating solutions in light of the UN sustainable development goals. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, K. N., Lindsay, V., and Xu, Y. (2018). Digital entrepreneurship. Information Systems Journal, 28(6), 1125–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing, C., and Mattsson, J. (2018). Fake it until you make it: business model conceptualization in digital entrepreneurship. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26(5), 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Startup Genome (2019) Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2019, www.startupgenome.com

  • Steiber, A. (2014). The Google model: Managing continuous innovation in a rapidly changing world. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussan, F., and Acs, Z. J. (2017). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 49(1): 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D. (2014). The digital economy anniversary edition: rethinking promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. McGraw Hill Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., and Bush, A.A. (2010). Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trakunsaranakom, C., Butdee, S., Noël, F., & Marin, P. (2018). Product Design Review in a Virtual Reality Environment. Applied Science and Engineering Progress, 11(2), 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Briel, F., Davidsson, P., & Recker, J. (2018). Digital technologies as external enablers of new venture creation in the IT hardware sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(1), 47–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorbach, S., Poandl, E., & Korajman, I. (2018). Digital Entrepreneurship: MOOCs in Entrepreneurship Education the Case of Graz University of Technology. In International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (pp. 545–555). Springer, Cham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, F., and Collier, A. (2016). Digital Entrepreneurship: Research and Practice, 9th Annual Conference of the EuroMed Academy of Business.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Elia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Elia, G., Gatti, L., Margherita, A. (2020). The Genome of Digital Entrepreneurship: A Descriptive Framework. In: Passiante, G. (eds) Innovative Entrepreneurship in Action. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 45. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42538-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics