Abstract
The objective of this chapter is to understand approaches conducted by experts to design an evaluation. It investigates the evaluation methods used by five disciplines (cognitive science, cognitive psychology, sociology, ethology, and ergonomics), in order to deduce the similarities and differences between these disciplines. In our qualitative survey, we asked five experts to reason on three research questions. These experts received instructions that consisted to explain how they would proceed to answer these questions. We then qualitatively analyzed experts’ explanations, which means that this chapter is the interpretation of both authors and cannot be generalized, even if it gives several interesting avenues worth exploring. In their responses, we mainly observed three different systems of thought which all lead to the same conclusion that seems to be a strong consensus that all research questions can be answered with a comparative study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jost, C., Le Pévédic, B. (2020). Designing Evaluations: Researchers’ Insights Interview of Five Experts. In: Jost, C., et al. Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42306-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42307-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)