Abstract
In this article, we focus on the movement of constitution of the mathematical object from a phenomenological perspective. In order to tackle this task, we proceeded hermeneutically studying the First Logical Investigation of Edmund Husserl, titled Expression and Meaning, from “Investigações Lógicas: segundo volume, parte I: Investigações para a Fenomenologia e a Teoria do Conhecimento, segunda edição, 1913” (We indicate this book in Portuguese because we had our investigation studying this version). In that text, Husserl is not dealing specifically with the mathematical object, but with the object in general. Given this scope, we interrogated the text, seeking to understand nuances of the object, which, in the realm of this investigation, we thematize as the mathematical object. We made considerations in pure logic and expressed the intimate relationship among (mathematical) object, as presented, and sense, meaning, demonstrating, speaking, expressing, as well as the acts of getting signification, evidence, and to understand the essence in order to elucidate how the movement of constitution of the mathematical object is actualized. We point out that the mathematical object is understood as an idea from the perspective of apprehended evidence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Psychologism is understood as the process of psychologically analyzing what is not in the field of psychology; a reduction of the object in question to psychology (Peres, 2017).
- 2.
We indicate 1901, because given the structure of the second edition of Logical Investigations, Volume 2, it is possible to access, in volume 2, the text of Logical Investigations, Volume 1, first edition. For further information, see the Portuguese translation of Logical Investigations, volume 2, Part I, Investigations for Phenomenology and Theory of Knowledge, Second Edition, 1913.
- 3.
Cited in the Introduction of the German editor Walter Biemel of “The Idea of Phenomenology”, while mentioning Edmund Husserl’s manuscripts of September, 1907, BII 1 (Husserl, 2008a).
- 4.
The Sixth Logical Investigation was published in 1921, separately from part I of the second volume.
- 5.
In order to preserve academic rigor, direct quotations were taken from the work published in English.
- 6.
In agreement with Onate, with understand physical state as “[...] is a concrete sign phenomenon” (2016, p. 91, author’s translation).
- 7.
Derrida talks about the possibility of surpassing the absence of a voice: “Mutism and deafness go together. A deaf individual can only participate in a colloquy by shaping their deeds in the form of words whose telos allows them to be heard by the speaker” (1994, p. 89, author’s translation).
- 8.
Still, the complexity of communicating to other individuals what is learned can be overcome if the interlocutors are focused on what is expressed in a pure way. “Pure,” in the sense Ales Bello (2004) points to, means that there are no external affects in the phenomenological analysis; which is performed in the phenomenological field without interference from other philosophical thoughts.
- 9.
Within the text, to refer to “apprehended evidence,” we wrote “intellectually grasped.”
- 10.
For Husserl the need to go back to “corresponding intuition,” for the clarification of the meaning represented symbolically, it occurs in cases in which the meaning of the content of a concept are fluid. In this case, the jurisdiction of illustrative intuition aims at identifying the topological limits of the differences shown with which the expressions express, and guarantee an effective judgment of the corresponding meaning.
- 11.
“The use of quotation marks in the expressions in-themselves and truths themselves is intended to mark the Husserlian detachment from meaning they enjoy in Kantian philosophy, but also, and above all, to indicate that they must be understood in a strictly phenomenological semantic context, to be gradually clarified in the sequence of Logical Investigations and other works published, as well as the other private texts currently available” (Onate, 2016, p. 101, author’s emphasis, author’s translation).
- 12.
“tend towards” is used here, in the sense of fostering, projecting, furthering; as we understand that, according to Husserl, intellectual thought cannot directly bring meaning.
References
Ales Bello, A. (2004). Fenomenologia e Ciências humanas. Trad. e Org. Miguel Mahfoud e Marina Massimi. Bauru: Edusc.
Chaui, M. (1988). Husserl: Vida e Obra. In E. Husserl. Investigações Lógicas: sexta investigação: elementos de uma elucidação fenomenológica do conhecimento (pp. V–XV). Seleção e tradução de Zeljko Loraric e Andréa Maria Altino de Campos Lorapric. São Paulo: Nova Cultural.
Derrida, J. (1994). A voz e o fenômeno: introdução ao problema do signo na fenomenologia de Husserl. Tradução de Lucy Magalhães. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar.
Gadamer, H. G. (2012). Verdade e Método I: traços fundamentais de uma hermenêutica filosófica (12th ed.). Tradução de Enio Paulo Giachini. Petrópolis: Vozes.
Husserl, E. (2008a). A Ideia da Fenomenologia (p. 70). Tradução de Artur Morão. Lisboa: Edições.
Husserl, E. (2008b). Logical investigations volume 1 (International Library of Philosophy) [Kindle edition]. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com
Husserl, E. (2012). Investigações Lógicas: segundo volume, parte I: Investigações para a fenomenologia e a teoria do conhecimento. Tradução de Pedro M. S. Ales e Carlos Aurélio Morujão. Rio de Janeiro: Forense.
Levinas, E. (1997). Descobrindo a existência com Husserl e Heidegger. Lisbon: Instituto Piaget.
Lyotard, J. F. (1954). A fenomenologia (p. 70). Lisbon: Edições.
Martinelli, Á. V. (2018). As origens do pensamento de Edmund Husserl: do psicologismo à fenomenologia. PERI Revista de Filosofia, 10, 36–57. Acesso Dezembro 7, 2018, em http://www.nexos.ufsc.br/index.php/peri/article/view/2021/2307
Onate, A. M. (2016). Ficção e tempo na filosofia de Edmund Husserl. Porto Alegre: Editora FI: EDIPUCRS. Acesso Janeiro 31, 2019, em http://ebooks.pucrs.br/edipucrs/Ebooks/Pdf/978-85-397-0861-1.pdf
Peres, S. P. (2017). Psicologia eidética e teoria do conhecimento nas Investigações lógicas de Husserl. Psicologia USP, 1, 118–124. Acesso Março 8, 2019, em http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65642017000100118&lng=en&nrm=iso
Sokolowski, R. (2010). Introdução à Fenomenologia (2nd ed). Tradução de Alfedro de Oliveira Moraes. São Paulo: Loyola.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Venturin, J.A., de Souza Coelho, F. (2020). The Constitution of the Mathematical Object in Acts of Evidence, from the Perspective of Edmund Husserl’s First Logical Investigation. In: Viggiani Bicudo, M. (eds) Constitution and Production of Mathematics in the Cyberspace. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42242-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42242-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42241-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42242-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)