Skip to main content

A Governance Perspective on the Complexification of Migration and Diversity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mainstreaming versus Alienation

Part of the book series: Global Diversities ((GLODIV))

Abstract

This chapter provides the analytical framework on which the subsequent chapters are based. It makes the case for a governance perspective on migration and diversity in order to make sense of the challenges that actors working on migration and diversity are facing. These challenges stem from what I have described as the ‘complexification’ of migration and diversity. A multidimensional governance perspective can help us to understand how actors cope with this complexity, and how multiple factors, including knowledge, institutions, discourses and power shape their responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bekkers, V., Fenger, M., & Scholten, P. (2017). Public policy in action: Perspectives on the policy process. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertossi, C. (2011). National models of integration in Europe: A comparative and critical analysis. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(12), 1561–1580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertossi, C., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2012). National models of immigrant integration: The costs for comparative research. Comparative European Politics, 10(3), 237–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. (1989). Economic theory and international migration. International Migration Review, 23(3), 457–485. https://doi.org/10.2307/2546424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, P. J. (2007). A view from France on the internal complexity of national models. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(6), 1003–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, W. R. (1990). Immigration, citizenship, and the nation-state in France and Germany: A comparative historical analysis. International Sociology, 5(4), 379–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. (1992). Nationhood and citizenship in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bygnes, S., & Erdal, M. (2017). Liquid migration, grounded lives: Considerations about future mobility and settlement among Polish and Spanish migrants in Norway. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 5(4), 379–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2014). Resilience: The governance of complexity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colebatch, H. K. (2009). Governance as a conceptual development in the analysis of policy. Critical policy studies, 3(1), 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crul, M. (2016). Super-diversity vs. assimilation: How complex diversity in majority–minority cities challenges the assumptions of assimilation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(1), 54–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crul, M., & Mollenkopf, J. (2012). The changing face of world cities: The second generation in Western Europe and the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crul, M., & Vermeulen, H. (2003). The second generation in Europe. International Migration Review, 37(4), 965–986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crul, M., Schneider, J., & Lelie, F. (2012). The European second generation compared: Does the integration context matter? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahinden, J. (2016). A plea for the ‘de-migranticization’ of research on migration and integration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(13), 2207–2225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, A., & Galaz, V. (2008). Governance and complexity—Emerging issues for governance theory. Governance, 21(3), 311–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engbersen, G. (2012). Migration transitions in an era of liquid migration. In European immigrations. Trends, structures and policy implications (pp. 91–106). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escafré-Dublet, A., & Lelévrier, C. (2018). Governing diversity without naming it: An analysis of neighbourhood policies in Paris. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776417750439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faist, T. (2000). Transnationalization in international migration: Implications for the study of citizenship and culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23(2), 189–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favell, A. (2001). Integration policy and integration research in Europe: A review and critique. Citizenship today: Global perspectives and practices, Washington, DC: Brooking Institution, 349–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldof, D. (2018). Superdiversity as a lens to understand complexities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, R., & Rihani, S. (2012). Complexity and public policy: A new approach to 21st century politics, policy and society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick-Schiller, N., Çaglar, A., & Guldbrandsen, T. (2006). Beyond the ethnic lens: Locality, globality, and born-again incorporation. American Ethnologist, 33(4), 612–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glorius, B., & Grabowska, I. (2014). Mobility in transition: Migration patterns after EU enlargement. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiraudon, V. (1997). Policy change behind gilded doors: Explaining the evolution of aliens’ rights in France, Germany and the Netherlands, 1974–94. New Haven: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms∗. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampshire, J. (2018). The politics of immigration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, D. A. (2006). Postethnic America: Beyond multiculturalism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, R. (2011). The governance of problems: Puzzling, powering and participation. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1997). The governance of complexity and the complexity of governance: Preliminary remarks on some problems and limits of economic guidance. Beyond market and hierarchy: Interactive governance and social complexity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 95–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. (1993). Complexity, governance and dynamics: Conceptual explorations of public network management. Modern governance, London: Sage, 191–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, A. M. (2004). Governance: Key concepts. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. (2014). Complexity in governance network theory. Complexity, Governance & Networks, 1(1), 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Klijn, E. H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. Abingdon: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, F. (2015). Migration in migration-related diversity? The nexus between superdiversity and migration studies. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, F., & Vertovec, S. (2015). Comparing super-diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2018). Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: So what? European Journal of Political Research, 52(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02065.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okólski, M. (2001). Incomplete migration: A new form of mobility in Central and Eastern Europe. The case of Polish and Ukrainian migrants. In C. Wallace & D. Stola (Eds.), Patterns of migration in Central Europe (pp. 105–128). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity, and accountability (Vol. 37). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, E. (2012). Taking complexity seriously: Policy analysis, triangulation and sustainable development. London: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2), 129–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, N., & Çağlar, A. (2013). Locating migrant pathways of economic emplacement: Thinking beyond the ethnic lens. Ethnicities, 13, 494–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, N. G., & Salazar, N. (2013). Regimes of mobility across the globe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(2), 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. M. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1995). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (2007). Strategic management and organisational dynamics: The challenge of complexity to ways of thinking about organisations. Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasan, T. (2014). Towards hyper-diversified European cities: A critical literature review. Utrecht: Utrecht University; Divercities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teisman, G. R., & Klijn, E.-H. (2008). Complexity theory and public management: An introduction. Public Management Review, 10(3), 287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teisman, G., van Buuren, A., & Gerrits, L. M. (2009). Managing complex governance systems. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bueren, E. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2003). Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 193–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verweij, M., & Thompson, M. (2006). Clumsy solutions for a complex world: Governance, politics and plural perceptions. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D. (2002). Constructing “race” and “ethnicity” in America: Category-making in public policy and administration. Armonk: ME Sharpe Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, K., Ashby, D., Boaz, A., & Grayson, L. (2002). Social science and the evidence-based policy movement. Social Policy and Society, 1(3), 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Scholten .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Scholten, P. (2020). A Governance Perspective on the Complexification of Migration and Diversity. In: Mainstreaming versus Alienation . Global Diversities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42238-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42238-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42237-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42238-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics