Abstract
The distinction is made between musical and other plagiarism. The right to be recognised as an author is discussed with reference to moral rights, the theoretical idea of ‘death of the author’ and socialist principles. The role of expert testimony versus AI-style metrics in detecting academic plagiarism is discussed and the greater difficulty of reaching unambiguous decisions in musical cases is highlighted. The decision to plagiarise in terms of rational choice economics, in the form of the economics of crime literature, is appraised with respect to its behavioural applicability and the accuracy of its predictions. We move on to consider empirical evidence on unconscious plagiarism and self-plagiarism in academic work. Nine sources of cognitive bias are identified, which may systematically distort judgements about one’s own or others’ degree of plagiarism. The chapter concludes by looking at the thin statistical evidence. Proxy data for the growth in song output is used to estimate the growth rate in material available as a target for musical plagiarism. Some evidence is shown for the claim that recent decades have seen a marked upsurge in litigation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Although Men at Work are an Australian ensemble, Colin Hay, is in fact, Scottish having been moved as a child. The song itself is lyrically full of Australian references including the title and the foodstuff Vegemite. It is also sung at many national sporting events to celebrate national pride.
References
Ariely, D. (2009). Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. New York: Harper Books.
Balganesh, S., Manta, I. D., & Wilkinson-Ryan, T. (2014). Judging Similarity. Iowa Law Review, 100, 267–290.
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217.
Becker, G. S. (1991). A Note on Restaurant Pricing and Other Examples of Social Influences on Price. Journal of Political Economy, 99(5), 1109–1116.
Brown, A. S., & Murphy, D. R. (1989). Cryptomnesia: Delineating Unconscious Plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 432–442.
Bulc, G. (2009). Laibach: Manipulation of the Manipulation. Bturn online magazine. Bturn.com. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
Cameron, S. (1993). The Demand for Capital Punishment. International Review of Law and Economics, 13(1), 47–59.
Cameron, S. (2015). Music in the Marketplace: A Social Economics Approach. Routledge.
Catanziriti, K. (2010). Judge Rules That Men at Work Hit Down Under Rips Off Kookaburra Sits in the Old Gum Tree. Herald Sun. February 4. Retrieved June 28, 2019, from https://www.heraldsun.com.au/entertainment/judge-rules-that-men-at-work-hit-down-under-rips-off-kookaburra-sits-in-the-old-gum-tree/news-story/a8b35a1225cd120504de96f017b6b4b4?sv=a65d8853ffe2c017cb6cd5b6527139f0.
Ceulemans, C., & Lowe, S. (2018). The Cost of Creation: Technology, Sampling and Lawsuits in Hip-Hop Music. Working Paper. https://www.cedricceulemans.net/uploads/2/0/4/2/20423775/the_cost_of_creation_abstract.pdf.
Chanbonpin, K. D. (2012). Legal Writing, the Remix: Plagiarism and Hip Hop Ethics. Mercer Law Review, 63, 597–638.
Collins, A., Judge, G., & Rickman, N. (2007). On the Economics of Plagiarism. European Journal of Law and Economics, 24(2), 93–107.
Cronin, C. (2016). Comment by Charles Cronin on HaloSongs, Inc., Martin Harrington, Thomas Leonard vs. Ed Sheeran, et al. Retrieved November 18, 2019, from https://blogs.law.gwu.edu/mcir/case/inplay-halosongs-inc-martin-harrington-thomas-leonard-v-ed-sheeran-et-al/.
Drury, J. (2018). Radiohead v Del Rey: How Record Companies Use Waveform Analysis, Forensics and… Shazam to Avoid Being Sued. The I. Originally published on 11th January and updated on 6th September 2019. Retrieved October 3, 2019, from https://inews.co.uk/culture/radiohead-v-del-rey-record-companies-use-waveform-analysis-forensics-shazam-avoid-sued-515084.
Einhorn, M. (2004). Media, Technology and Copyright: Integrating Law and Economics. Edward Elgar.
Einhorn, M. (2010). Damage Valuation in Music Copyright. Retrieved July 9, 2019, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1611219.
Einhorn, M. (2014). Copyright, Causality and the Courts. Retrieved July 9, 2019, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2406392.
Fariña, F., Arce, R., & Novo, M. (2003). Cognitive Bias and Judicial Decisions. In M. Vanderhallen, G. Vervaeke, P. J. Van Koppen, & J. Goethals (Eds.), Much Ado About Crime (pp. 287–304). Bruselas: Uitgeverij Politeia NV.
Farmer, P. (2007). Granny blog. Retrieved April 6, 2019, from http://grannyp.blogspot.com/2007/06/cured.html.
Foucault, M. (2003). What Is an Author. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Essential Foucault (pp. 101–120). New York: New Press.
Ginsburgh, V. A., & van Ours, J. C. (2003). Expert Opinion and Compensation: Evidence from a Musical Competition. American Economic Review, 93(1), 289–296.
Glejser, H., & Heyndels, B. (2001). Efficiency and Inefficiency in the Ranking in Competitions: The Case of the Queen Elisabeth Music Contest. Journal of Cultural Economics, 25(2), 109–129.
Greenfield, S., & Osborn, G. (2005). Law, Music and the Creative Process – Who Is Now an Author? In Readings in Law and Popular Culture (Vol. 14, pp. 310–324). Routledge Studies in Law, Society and Popular Culture.
Hansmann, H., & Santilli, M. (1997). Authors’ and Artists’ Moral Rights: A Comparative Legal and Economic Analysis, originally published Journal of Legal Studies, 26, 96–141. Obtained from: Faculty Scholarship Series. 5065. Retrieved July 10, 2019, from http://digitalcommons.law.yale.ed.
Hess, M. (2006). Was Foucault a Plagiarist? Hip-Hop Sampling and Academic Citation. Computers and Composition, 23, 280–295.
Hochma, T. (2017). The Ultimate List of Cognitive Biases: Why Humans Make Irrational Decisions. Human How website, Continually Updated Webpage But the Time of Access Gave 30 May 2017 as the page date. Retrieved May 22, 2019, from https://humanhow.com/en/list-of-cognitive-biases-with-examples/.
Hurwitz, L. (2015). Can’t Touch This: A Comparative Analysis of Sampling Law in the United States and Internationally. Michigan State International Law Review, 23(1), 231–264.
Kahnemann, D. (2012). Thinking Fast and Slow (Penguin Reprint ed.). Harmondsworth.
Ke, J. (1994). Slovenia (Entry in Section- GLOBAL PULSE the Latest Music News From Round the Planet), Billboard. November 5.
Klein, B., Lerner, A., & Murphy, K. (2002). The Economics of Copyright “Fair Use” in a Networked World. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 92(2), 205–208.
Laibach. (1982). 10 Items of the Covenant. Retrieved October 22, 2019, from http://www.laibach.org/data/10-items-of-the-covenant/.
Landes, W., & Posner, R. (1989). An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law. Journal of Legal Studies, 18(2), 325–363.
Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, Snob and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumer Demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2), 183–207.
Michaels, S. (2011, April 5). Kate Bush Reveals Guest Lyricist on New Album – James Joyce. The Guardian.
Moore, J., & Baker, E. (2013). 57 Songs That Sound the Same. Retrieved June 24, 2019, from https://www.complex.com/music/2013/01/57-songs-that-sound-the-same/.
Moreton, C. (1997, November 30). No Regrets as Oasis Admit They Stole Tunes. The Independent. Retrieved July 9, 2019, from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/no-regrets-as-oasis-admit-they-stole-tunes-1297147.html.
Newman, J. (2016). 11 Famous Rock Songs You Didn’t Know Were Sued for Plagiarism. Retrieved from https://www.fuse.tv/authors/jason-newman#latest (not the actual page).
Novos, I., & Waldman, M. (1984). The Effects of Increased Copyright Protection. Journal of Political Economy, 92(2), 236–246.
Perfect, T. J., & Stark, L. J. (2008). Why Do I Always Have the Best Ideas? The Role of Idea Quality in Unconscious Plagiarism. Memory, 16(4), 386–394.
Rosen, R. S. (2008). Music and Copyright. Oxford University Press.
Rushton, M. (2001). The Law and Economics of Artists’ Inalienable Rights. Journal of Cultural Economics, 25(4), 243–257.
Sanchez, F. (2019, August 2). 123 Artists File an Amicus Brief in Led Zeppelin’s Closely Watched ‘Stairway to Heaven’ Lawsuit. Digital Music News. Retrieved November 18, 2019, from https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2019/08/02/led-zeppelin-amicus-brief/.
Sattler, S., Graeff, P., & Willen, S. (2013). Explaining the Decision to Plagiarize: An Empirical Test of the Interplay Between Rationality, Norms and Opportunity. Deviant Behaviour, 34(6), 444–463.
Scherer, F. M. (2008). The Emergence of Musical Copyright in Europe from 1709 to 1850. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 5(2), 3–18.
Scott, A. (2017). 40 of the Best Songs inspired by books. Scottish Book Trust. Blog. Books-Reading. Published 9th November, 2017. Retrieved June 23, 2019.
Shenkar, O. (2010). Copycats: How Smart Companies Use Imitation to Gain a Strategic Edge. Strategic Direction, 26(10), 3–5.
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138.
Sparkles, J. (2018). 35 Songs You Didn’t Know Were (Allegedly) Plagiarised. Retrieved June 24, 2019, from https://www.sheknows.com/entertainment/articles/1049435/songs-you-didnt-know-were-allegedly-plagiarized/.
Stav, I. (2014). Musical Plagiarism: A True Challenge for the Copyright Law. DePaul Journal of Art, Technology and Intellectual Property Law, 25(1), Fall Article 2.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge. Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness (Penguin Reprint ed.). Harmondsworth.
Thursby, J., Thursby, M., & Jensen, R. A. (1991). Smuggling, Camouflage and Market Structure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(3), 789–814.
Towse, R. (2017). The Economics of Music Publishing: Copyright and the Market. Journal of Cultural Economics, 41(4), 403–420.
van Horen, F., & Pieters, R. (2012). Consumer Evaluation of Copycat Brands: The Effect of Imitation Type. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(3), 246–255.
Varian, H. (2005). Copying and Copyright. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(2), 121–138.
Vaver, D. (1987). Authors’ Moral Rights – Reform Proposals in Canada: Charter or Barter of Rights for Creators? Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 25(4), 749–786.
Watson, J. (2017). Copyright and the Production of Hip-Hop Music. Semantic Scholar website. Retrieved July 7, 2019, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7219/a09fa0a5b9b569ea9255088ab24bc8a2c7c4.pdf?_ga=2.117682305.907132683.1562585029-1907714462.1562585029.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cameron, S. (2020). What Is Plagiarism and What Is Musical Plagiarism?. In: An Economic Approach to the Plagiarism of Music. Cultural Economics & the Creative Economy. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42109-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42109-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42108-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42109-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)