Advertisement

What Is Plagiarism and What Is Musical Plagiarism?

  • Samuel Cameron
Chapter
  • 18 Downloads
Part of the Cultural Economics & the Creative Economy book series (CECE)

Abstract

The distinction is made between musical and other plagiarism. The right to be recognised as an author is discussed with reference to moral rights, the theoretical idea of ‘death of the author’ and socialist principles. The role of expert testimony versus AI-style metrics in detecting academic plagiarism is discussed and the greater difficulty of reaching unambiguous decisions in musical cases is highlighted. The decision to plagiarise in terms of rational choice economics, in the form of the economics of crime literature, is appraised with respect to its behavioural applicability and the accuracy of its predictions. We move on to consider empirical evidence on unconscious plagiarism and self-plagiarism in academic work. Nine sources of cognitive bias are identified, which may systematically distort judgements about one’s own or others’ degree of plagiarism. The chapter concludes by looking at the thin statistical evidence. Proxy data for the growth in song output is used to estimate the growth rate in material available as a target for musical plagiarism. Some evidence is shown for the claim that recent decades have seen a marked upsurge in litigation.

Keywords

Plagiarism Economics of crime Cryptomnesia Cognitive bias Growth in song production 

References

  1. Ariely, D. (2009). Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. New York: Harper Books.Google Scholar
  2. Balganesh, S., Manta, I. D., & Wilkinson-Ryan, T. (2014). Judging Similarity. Iowa Law Review, 100, 267–290.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1991). A Note on Restaurant Pricing and Other Examples of Social Influences on Price. Journal of Political Economy, 99(5), 1109–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, A. S., & Murphy, D. R. (1989). Cryptomnesia: Delineating Unconscious Plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 432–442.Google Scholar
  6. Bulc, G. (2009). Laibach: Manipulation of the Manipulation. Bturn online magazine. Bturn.com. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  7. Cameron, S. (1993). The Demand for Capital Punishment. International Review of Law and Economics, 13(1), 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron, S. (2015). Music in the Marketplace: A Social Economics Approach. Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Catanziriti, K. (2010). Judge Rules That Men at Work Hit Down Under Rips Off Kookaburra Sits in the Old Gum Tree. Herald Sun. February 4. Retrieved June 28, 2019, from https://www.heraldsun.com.au/entertainment/judge-rules-that-men-at-work-hit-down-under-rips-off-kookaburra-sits-in-the-old-gum-tree/news-story/a8b35a1225cd120504de96f017b6b4b4?sv=a65d8853ffe2c017cb6cd5b6527139f0.
  10. Ceulemans, C., & Lowe, S. (2018). The Cost of Creation: Technology, Sampling and Lawsuits in Hip-Hop Music. Working Paper. https://www.cedricceulemans.net/uploads/2/0/4/2/20423775/the_cost_of_creation_abstract.pdf.
  11. Chanbonpin, K. D. (2012). Legal Writing, the Remix: Plagiarism and Hip Hop Ethics. Mercer Law Review, 63, 597–638.Google Scholar
  12. Collins, A., Judge, G., & Rickman, N. (2007). On the Economics of Plagiarism. European Journal of Law and Economics, 24(2), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cronin, C. (2016). Comment by Charles Cronin on HaloSongs, Inc., Martin Harrington, Thomas Leonard vs. Ed Sheeran, et al. Retrieved November 18, 2019, from https://blogs.law.gwu.edu/mcir/case/inplay-halosongs-inc-martin-harrington-thomas-leonard-v-ed-sheeran-et-al/.
  14. Drury, J. (2018). Radiohead v Del Rey: How Record Companies Use Waveform Analysis, Forensics and… Shazam to Avoid Being Sued. The I. Originally published on 11th January and updated on 6th September 2019. Retrieved October 3, 2019, from https://inews.co.uk/culture/radiohead-v-del-rey-record-companies-use-waveform-analysis-forensics-shazam-avoid-sued-515084.
  15. Einhorn, M. (2004). Media, Technology and Copyright: Integrating Law and Economics. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  16. Einhorn, M. (2010). Damage Valuation in Music Copyright. Retrieved July 9, 2019, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1611219.
  17. Einhorn, M. (2014). Copyright, Causality and the Courts. Retrieved July 9, 2019, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2406392.
  18. Fariña, F., Arce, R., & Novo, M. (2003). Cognitive Bias and Judicial Decisions. In M. Vanderhallen, G. Vervaeke, P. J. Van Koppen, & J. Goethals (Eds.), Much Ado About Crime (pp. 287–304). Bruselas: Uitgeverij Politeia NV.Google Scholar
  19. Farmer, P. (2007). Granny blog. Retrieved April 6, 2019, from http://grannyp.blogspot.com/2007/06/cured.html.
  20. Foucault, M. (2003). What Is an Author. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Essential Foucault (pp. 101–120). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ginsburgh, V. A., & van Ours, J. C. (2003). Expert Opinion and Compensation: Evidence from a Musical Competition. American Economic Review, 93(1), 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glejser, H., & Heyndels, B. (2001). Efficiency and Inefficiency in the Ranking in Competitions: The Case of the Queen Elisabeth Music Contest. Journal of Cultural Economics, 25(2), 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenfield, S., & Osborn, G. (2005). Law, Music and the Creative Process – Who Is Now an Author? In Readings in Law and Popular Culture (Vol. 14, pp. 310–324). Routledge Studies in Law, Society and Popular Culture.Google Scholar
  24. Hansmann, H., & Santilli, M. (1997). Authors’ and Artists’ Moral Rights: A Comparative Legal and Economic Analysis, originally published Journal of Legal Studies, 26, 96–141. Obtained from: Faculty Scholarship Series. 5065. Retrieved July 10, 2019, from http://digitalcommons.law.yale.ed.
  25. Hess, M. (2006). Was Foucault a Plagiarist? Hip-Hop Sampling and Academic Citation. Computers and Composition, 23, 280–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hochma, T. (2017). The Ultimate List of Cognitive Biases: Why Humans Make Irrational Decisions. Human How website, Continually Updated Webpage But the Time of Access Gave 30 May 2017 as the page date. Retrieved May 22, 2019, from https://humanhow.com/en/list-of-cognitive-biases-with-examples/.
  27. Hurwitz, L. (2015). Can’t Touch This: A Comparative Analysis of Sampling Law in the United States and Internationally. Michigan State International Law Review, 23(1), 231–264.Google Scholar
  28. Kahnemann, D. (2012). Thinking Fast and Slow (Penguin Reprint ed.). Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  29. Ke, J. (1994). Slovenia (Entry in Section- GLOBAL PULSE the Latest Music News From Round the Planet), Billboard. November 5.Google Scholar
  30. Klein, B., Lerner, A., & Murphy, K. (2002). The Economics of Copyright “Fair Use” in a Networked World. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 92(2), 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laibach. (1982). 10 Items of the Covenant. Retrieved October 22, 2019, from http://www.laibach.org/data/10-items-of-the-covenant/.
  32. Landes, W., & Posner, R. (1989). An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law. Journal of Legal Studies, 18(2), 325–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, Snob and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumer Demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2), 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Michaels, S. (2011, April 5). Kate Bush Reveals Guest Lyricist on New Album – James Joyce. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  35. Moore, J., & Baker, E. (2013). 57 Songs That Sound the Same. Retrieved June 24, 2019, from https://www.complex.com/music/2013/01/57-songs-that-sound-the-same/.
  36. Moreton, C. (1997, November 30). No Regrets as Oasis Admit They Stole Tunes. The Independent. Retrieved July 9, 2019, from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/no-regrets-as-oasis-admit-they-stole-tunes-1297147.html.
  37. Newman, J. (2016). 11 Famous Rock Songs You Didn’t Know Were Sued for Plagiarism. Retrieved from https://www.fuse.tv/authors/jason-newman#latest (not the actual page).
  38. Novos, I., & Waldman, M. (1984). The Effects of Increased Copyright Protection. Journal of Political Economy, 92(2), 236–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Perfect, T. J., & Stark, L. J. (2008). Why Do I Always Have the Best Ideas? The Role of Idea Quality in Unconscious Plagiarism. Memory, 16(4), 386–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosen, R. S. (2008). Music and Copyright. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rushton, M. (2001). The Law and Economics of Artists’ Inalienable Rights. Journal of Cultural Economics, 25(4), 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanchez, F. (2019, August 2). 123 Artists File an Amicus Brief in Led Zeppelin’s Closely Watched ‘Stairway to Heaven’ Lawsuit. Digital Music News. Retrieved November 18, 2019, from https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2019/08/02/led-zeppelin-amicus-brief/.
  43. Sattler, S., Graeff, P., & Willen, S. (2013). Explaining the Decision to Plagiarize: An Empirical Test of the Interplay Between Rationality, Norms and Opportunity. Deviant Behaviour, 34(6), 444–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scherer, F. M. (2008). The Emergence of Musical Copyright in Europe from 1709 to 1850. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 5(2), 3–18.Google Scholar
  45. Scott, A. (2017). 40 of the Best Songs inspired by books. Scottish Book Trust. Blog. Books-Reading. Published 9th November, 2017. Retrieved June 23, 2019.Google Scholar
  46. Shenkar, O. (2010). Copycats: How Smart Companies Use Imitation to Gain a Strategic Edge. Strategic Direction, 26(10), 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sparkles, J. (2018). 35 Songs You Didn’t Know Were (Allegedly) Plagiarised. Retrieved June 24, 2019, from https://www.sheknows.com/entertainment/articles/1049435/songs-you-didnt-know-were-allegedly-plagiarized/.
  49. Stav, I. (2014). Musical Plagiarism: A True Challenge for the Copyright Law. DePaul Journal of Art, Technology and Intellectual Property Law, 25(1), Fall Article 2.Google Scholar
  50. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge. Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness (Penguin Reprint ed.). Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  51. Thursby, J., Thursby, M., & Jensen, R. A. (1991). Smuggling, Camouflage and Market Structure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(3), 789–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Towse, R. (2017). The Economics of Music Publishing: Copyright and the Market. Journal of Cultural Economics, 41(4), 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. van Horen, F., & Pieters, R. (2012). Consumer Evaluation of Copycat Brands: The Effect of Imitation Type. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(3), 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Varian, H. (2005). Copying and Copyright. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(2), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vaver, D. (1987). Authors’ Moral Rights – Reform Proposals in Canada: Charter or Barter of Rights for Creators? Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 25(4), 749–786.Google Scholar
  56. Watson, J. (2017). Copyright and the Production of Hip-Hop Music. Semantic Scholar website. Retrieved July 7, 2019, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7219/a09fa0a5b9b569ea9255088ab24bc8a2c7c4.pdf?_ga=2.117682305.907132683.1562585029-1907714462.1562585029.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel Cameron
    • 1
  1. 1.BradfordUK

Personalised recommendations