Abstract
This chapter presents narrative accounts of the strategies and tactics used by successful women in physics. The cross-case analysis of these academic women’s trajectories demonstrates the salience of three significant experiences, and concurrent identity negotiations that facilitated their persistence in physics: (1) reliance on the self, (2) social support networks, and (3) the construction of a working class hero identity. This work presents suggestions for recruitment and retention of women in physics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Russell Group Universities are a collective of 24 public research universities in the UK, arguably regarded as the best universities in the UK (https://russellgroup.ac.uk)
References
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Balancing acts: Elementary school girls’ negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science. Science Education, 96(6), 967–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21031.
Archer, L., Osborne, J., DeWitt, J., Dillon, J., Wong, B., & Willis, B. (2013). ASPIRES Young people’s science and career aspirations, age 10–14. Retrieved from http://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/education/research/aspires/ASPIRES-final-report- December-2013.pdf.
Archer, L., Moote, J., Francis, B., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2016). The “exceptional” physics girl: A sociological analysis of multimethod data from young women aged 10–16 to explore gendered patterns of post-16 participation. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216678379.
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2008). Girls’ biology, boys’ physics: Evidence from free-choice science learning settings. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(1), 75–92. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02635140701847538.
Berger, R. (2015). Challenges and coping strategies in leavening an ultra-orthodox community. Qualitative Social Work, 14(5), 670–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325014565147.
Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<441::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-3.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1993). Imitation and gender insubordination. In I. H. Abelove, M. A. Barale, & D. M. Halperin (Eds.), The lesbian and gay studies reader (pp. 307–320). New York: Routledge.
Carli, L. L., Alawa, L., Lee, Y., Zhao, B., & Kim, E. (2016). Stereotypes about gender and science: Women = scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315622645.
Carlone, H. B., Webb, A. W., Archer, L., & Taylor, M. (2015b). What kind of boy does science? A critical perspective on the science trajectories of four scientifically talented boys. Science Education, 99(3), 438–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21155.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Danielsson, A. T. (2012). Exploring woman university physics students ‘doing gender’ and ‘doing physics’. Gender and Education, 24(1), 25–39. Retrieved from http://ezproxy-prd.bodleian.ox.ac.uk:2108/doi/abs/10.1080/09540253.2011.565040#.VMdzvVqZbww.
Danielsson, A. T. (2014). In the physics class: University physics students’ enactment of class and gender in the context of laboratory work. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(2), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9421-3.
de Boise, S. (2016). Post-Bourdieusian moments and methods in music sociology: Toward a critical, practice-based approach. Cultural Sociology, 10(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975516628309.
DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Osborne, J. (2014). Science-related aspirations across the primary- secondary divide: Evidence from two surveys in England. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.871659.
Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. New York: Routledge.
Department for Education and Skills. (2007). Gender and education: The evidence on pupils in England. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/00389-2007BKT-EN.pdf.
Ecklund, E. H., Lincoln, A. E., & Tansey, C. (2012). Gender segregation in elite academic science. Gender & Society, 26(5), 693–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243212451904.
Everyday Sexism Project. (2017). Retrieved September 18, 2017, from https://everydaysexism.com/
Francis, B. (2012). Gender monoglossia, gender heteroglossia: The potential of Bakhtin’s work for re-conceptualising gender. Journal of Gender Studies, 21(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2012.639174.
Fuller, C. (2018). The existential self: Challenging and renegotiating gender identity through higher education in England. Gender and Education, 30(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1241380.
Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. BDJ, 204(6), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192.
Gonsalves, A. J. (2014). “Physics and the girly girl—There is a contradiction somewhere”: Doctoral students’ positioning around discourses of gender and competence in physics. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(2), 503–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9447-6.
Gonsalves, A., Rahm, J., & Carvalho, A. (2013). “We could think of things that could be science”: Girls’ re-figuring of science in an out-of-school-time club. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(9), 1068–1097. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21105.
Götschel, H. (2013). No space for girliness in physics: Understanding and overcoming the masculinity of physics. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(2), 531–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9479-y.
Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is strong objectivity? In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies. New York/London: Routledge.
Harnois, G., & Gabriel, P. (2000). Mental health and work: Impact, issues and good practice. Geneva. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mental_health
Hazari, Z., Tai, R. H., & Sadler, P. M. (2007). Introductory university physics performance : The influence of high school physics preparation. Gender and Education, 91(6), 847–876. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.
Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2016). Data collection|HESA. Retrieved from https://www.hesa.ac.uk/collection
Hughes, G. (2001). Exploring the availability of student scientist identities within curriculum discourse: An anti-essentialist approach to gender-inclusive science. Gender and Education, 13(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250120063562.
Johnson, A., Brown, J., Carlone, H., & Cuevas, A. K. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20411.
Kantaria, P. (2012). It’s different for girls: The influence of schools A report looking at data from the National Pupil Database comparing boys’ and girls’ choices of science A-levels and the influence of their GCSE schools on these choices. Retrieved from http://www.iop.org/education/teacher/support/girls_physics/file_58196.pdf
Lancaster, K. (2016). Confidentiality, anonymity and power relations in elite interviewing: Conducting qualitative policy research in a politicised domain. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1–11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1123555
Lock, R. M., Hazari, Z., & Potvin, G. (2012). Physics career intentions: The effect of physics identity, math identity, and gender. In Physics education research conference (pp. 262–265). American Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789702.
Lucey, H., Melody, J., & Walkerdine, V. (2003). Uneasy hybrids: Psychosocial aspects of becoming educationally successful for working-class young women. Gender and Education, 15(3), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250303865.
Miller-Friedmann, J., Childs, A., & Hillier, J. (2018). Approaching gender equity in academic chemistry: Lessons learned from successful female chemists in the UK. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00252H.
Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10593–10597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809921106.
Phipps, A., & Young, I. (2015). Neoliberalisation and “lad cultures” in higher education. Sociology, 49(2), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038514542120.
Sadler, P. M., Almarode, J. T., Miller-Friedmann, J. L., Tai, R. H., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Dabney, K. P. (2012). Out-of-school time science activities and their association with career interest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education, Part B. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2011.629455.
Sikora, J., & Pokropek, A. (2012). Gender segregation of adolescent science career plans in 50 countries. Science Education, 96(2), 234–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20479.
Sinnes, A. (2006). Three approaches to gender equity in science education. NorDiNa, 2(1), 72–83.
Stentiford, L. J. (2018). “You can tell which ones are the laddy lads”: Young women’s accounts of the engineering classroom at a high-performing English university. Journal of Gender Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2018.1423957.
Stewart, M. (1998). Gender issues in physics education. Educational Research, 40(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188980400302.
Venville, G., Rennie, L., Hanbury, C., & Longnecker, N. (2013). Scientists reflect on why they chose to study science. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2207–2233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9352-3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miller-Friedmann, J. (2020). Elite British Female Physicists: Social Mobility and Identity Negotiations. In: Gonsalves, A.J., Danielsson, A.T. (eds) Physics Education and Gender. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41933-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41933-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41932-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41933-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)