Advertisement

An Intersectional Physics Identity Framework for Studying Physics Settings

Chapter
  • 195 Downloads
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 19)

Abstract

This chapter reports on research featuring three women physics majors of color who had generally positive things to say about their experiences in physics. This chapter presents data that helps us to understand the physics identity which is available in a setting where women of color feel particularly successful, and how that identity is accessible to women of color. Drawing on intersectionality theory and utilizing a Patricia Hill Collins’ Domains-of-Power Framework, this chapter considers how identities of successful women physics majors of color align with or how they contest wider patterns in physics and in society.

References

  1. Anzaldúa, G. (1999). Borderlands/La frontera (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Aunt Lute.Google Scholar
  2. Barthelemy, R. S., McCormick, M., & Henderson, C. (2016). Gender discrimination in physics and astronomy: Graduate student experiences of sexism and gender microaggressions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020119.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beichner, R. (2008). SCALE-UP: Student-centered active learning environment for undergraduate programs. Retrieved from http://scaleup.ncsu.edu/
  4. Carlone, H., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Collins, P. H. (2009). Another kind of public education: Race, schools, the media, and democratic possibilities. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Chicester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  9. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139.Google Scholar
  10. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. Fullilove, R., & Treisman, U. (1990). Mathematics achievement among African American undergraduates at the University of California, Berkeley: An evaluation of the Mathematics Workshop Program. The Journal of Negro Education, 59(3), 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ginther, D. K., Schaffer, W. T., Schnell, J., Masimore, B., Liu, F., Haak, L. L., & Kington, R. (2011). Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards. Science, 333(6045), 1015–1019.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gonsalves, A. J., Danielsson, A., & Pettersson, H. (2016). Masculinities and experimental practices in physics: The view from three case studies. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020120.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guy-Sheftall, B. (1995). Words of fire: An anthology of African-American feminist thought. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hilborn, R. C., Howes, R. H., & Krane, K. S. (2003). Strategic programs for innovations in undergraduate physics: Project report. College Park: American Association of Physics Teachers (NJ1).Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, A. (2007). Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education, 91, 805–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, A., Brown, J., Carlone, H., & Cuevas, A. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, A., Ong, M., Ko, L., Smith, J., & Hodari, A. (2017). Common challenges faced by women of color in physics, and actions faculty can take to minimize those challenges. The Physics Teacher, 55, 356–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kachchaf, R., Ko, L., Hodari, A., & Ong, M. (2015). Career–life balance for women of color: Experiences in science and engineering academia. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 8(3), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ko, L. T., Kachchaf, R. R., Hodari, A. K., & Ong, M. (2014). Agency of women of color in physics and astronomy: Strategies for persistence and success. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(2), 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moraga, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (Eds.). (1981). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. National Science Foundation. (2016). Science and engineering indicators. Retrieved May 25, 2017 https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsb20161/#/report
  26. National Science Foundation., & National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017. Special report NSF 17-310. www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
  27. Office for Civil Rights. (2014). Civil rights data collection: Data snapshot (College and career readiness). Retrieved from Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Ong, M. (2005). Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Social Problems, 52(4), 593–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Savinainen, A., & Scott, P. (2002). The force concept inventory: A tool for monitoring student learning. Physics Education, 37(1), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, B. (1983). Home girls: A black feminist anthology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Hold, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  33. Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  34. Traxler, A. L., Cid, X. C., Blue, J., & Barthelemy, R. (2016). Enriching gender in physics education research: A binary past and a complex future. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020114.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Treisman, U. (1992). Studying students studying calculus: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college. The College Mathematics Journal, 23(5), 362–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zinn, M. B., & Dill, B. T. (1996). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. Feminist Studies, 22(2), 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Mary’s College of MarylandSt. Mary’s CityUSA

Personalised recommendations