Advertisement

Lighting the Fuse: Cultivating the Masculine Physics Habitus – A Case Study of Victor Aged 10–18

Chapter
  • 220 Downloads
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 19)

Abstract

This chapter presents a longitudinal case study analysis of Victor, a young man who was interviewed from the ages of 10–19, together with his mother, Sam, and who went on to study for a degree in astrophysics. We apply a Bourdieusian conceptual lens to the data, to explore how interactions of capital, habitus and field combine to possibilise Victor and his trajectory to being/becoming a physicist. We also identify specific alignments of his habitus and capital with dominant notions of masculinity and ‘cleverness’ that are demanded and normalised within physics and which, we argue, are key to the reproduction of the elite nature of physics.

References

  1. Adkins, L. (2004). Introduction: Feminism, Bourdieu and after. The Sociological Review, 52, 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00521.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, L., & Francis, B. (2007). Understanding minority ethnic achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012a). “Balancing acts”: Elementary school girls’ negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science. Science Education, 96(6), 967–989.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012b). Science aspirations, capital and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881–908.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211433290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous: Primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(1), 171–194.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.748676. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). Science capital: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending Bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Archer, L., Moote, J., Francis, B., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2017). The “exceptional” physics girl: A sociological analysis of multimethod data from young women aged 10–16 to explore gendered patterns of post-16 participation. American Educational Research Journal, 54, 1–39.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216678379. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Archer, L., Moote, J., & MacLeod, E. (2020). Learning that physics is ‘not for me’: Pedagogic work and the cultivation of habitus among advanced level physics students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1–38.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1707679.
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination, R. Nice (Trans). Cambridge: Polity Press. Originally published as La Domination Masculine. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (2010). Sociology is a martial art. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Routledge, Chapman & Hall Inc: London & New York.Google Scholar
  17. Carlone, H. B. (2003). (Re)producing good science students: Girls’ participation in high school physics. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9, 17–34.  https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i1.20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Danielsson, A. T. (2012). Exploring woman university physics students “doing gender” and “doing physics”. Gender and Education, 24(1), 25–39.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2011.565040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Mau, A. (2016). Dimensions of science capital: Exploring its potential for understanding students’ science participation. International Journal of Science Education, 38(16), 2431–2449.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1248520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dika, S. L., & Singh, K. (2002). Applications of social capital in educational literature: A critical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 72(1), 31–60.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072001031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Francis, B. (1999). Lads, Lasses and (New) Labour: 14-16-year-old students’ responses to the ‘laddish behaviour and boys’ underachievement’ debate. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(3), 355–371.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01425699995317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Francis, B. (2000). The gendered subject: Students’ subject preferences and discussions of gender and subject ability. Oxford Review of Education, 26, 35–48.  https://doi.org/10.1080/030549800103845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gonsalves, A. (2014). “Physics and the girly girl—There is a contradiction somewhere”: Doctoral students’ positioning around discourses of gender and competence in physics. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 9, 503–521.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9447-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Israel, G. D., Beaulieu, L. J., & Hartless, G. (2001). The influence of family and community social capital on educational achievement. Rural Sociology, 66, 43–68.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2001.tb00054.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Westport: Ablex.Google Scholar
  28. Martin, N. D. (2009). Social capital, academic achievement, and postgraduation plans at an elite, private university. Sociological Perspectives, 52, 185–210.  https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2009.52.2.185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McLeod, J. (2005). Feminists re-reading Bourdieu: Old debates and new questions about gender habitus and gender change. Theory and Research in Education, 3(1), 11–30.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878505049832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McNay, L. (1999). Gender, habitus and the field: Pierre Bourdieu and the limits of reflexivity. Theory, Culture & Society, 16(1), 95–117.  https://doi.org/10.1177/026327699016001007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mendick, H., & Francis, B. (2012). Boffin and geek identities: Abject or privileged? Gender and Education, 24(1), 15–24.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2011.564575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mendick, H. (2016). Gender and physics: A sociological approach. Physics Education, 51(5), 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/51/5/055014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moi, T. (1991). Appropriating Bourdieu: Feminist theory and Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology of Culture. New Literary History, 22(4), 1017–1049.Google Scholar
  34. Moote, J., Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & MacLeod, E. (2019). Comparing students’ engineering and science aspirations from age 10 to 16: Investigating the role of gender, ethnicity, cultural capital, and attitudinal factors. Journal of Engineering Education, 109.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20302.
  35. Ong, M. (2005). Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Social Problems, 52, 593–617.  https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. A report to the Nuffield Foundation. London: King’s College London.Google Scholar
  37. Perna, L. W., & Titus, M. A. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrolment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 485–518.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2005.11772296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sandefur, G. D., Meier, A., & Campbell, M. (2006). Family resources, social capital and college attendance. Social Science Research, 35, 525–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vincent, C., & Ball, S. (2007). Childcare, choice and class practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Webb, J., Schirato, T., & Danaher, G. (2002). Understanding Bourdieu. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UCL Institute of EducationLondonUK

Personalised recommendations