Advertisement

Conclusions Part II: Implications of Identity Research for Upper Secondary Educators

Chapter
  • 186 Downloads
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 19)

Abstract

This chapter reviews findings from other chapters and applies these lessons to secondary contexts. Non-dominant students face difficulty forming physics identities because of classed, racialized, and gendered notions about “who” can do physics as well as systematic hurdles which serve as gatekeepers. Secondary educators need to actively work against these forces by disrupting norms around gender, cleverness, race, and interest through discussions with their students and other faculty to produce a culture that more readily recognizes non-dominant students as intelligible physicists. There is enormous potential for using identity as a tool to examine how students learn physics and position themselves (and each other) relative to the field. Before launching into a discussion of the implications this collection holds for upper secondary educators, I will first describe my own background and context so that readers can better understand my perspectives.

References

  1. Carlone, H., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Francis, B., Archer, L., Moote, J., DeWitt, J., MacLeod, E., & Yeomans, L. (2016). The construction of physics as a quintessentially masculine subject: Young people’s perceptions of gender issues in access to physics. Sex Roles, 76, 1–19.Google Scholar
  3. Hazari, Z., & Cass, C. (2018). Towards meaningful physics recognition: What does this recognition actually look like? The Physics Teacher, 56(7), 442–446.  https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5055325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hazari, Z., Brewe, E., Goertzen, R. M., & Hodapp, T. (2017). The importance of high school physics teachers for female students’ physics identity and persistence. The Physics Teacher, 55(2), 96–99.  https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4974122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<296::AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rifkin, M. (2016, January 29). Addressing underrepresentation: Physics teaching for all. The Physics Teacher, 54(2), 72–74.  https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4940167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saranac Lake High SchoolSaranac LakeUSA

Personalised recommendations