Abstract
This chapter reviews findings from other chapters and applies these lessons to secondary contexts. Non-dominant students face difficulty forming physics identities because of classed, racialized, and gendered notions about “who” can do physics as well as systematic hurdles which serve as gatekeepers. Secondary educators need to actively work against these forces by disrupting norms around gender, cleverness, race, and interest through discussions with their students and other faculty to produce a culture that more readily recognizes non-dominant students as intelligible physicists. There is enormous potential for using identity as a tool to examine how students learn physics and position themselves (and each other) relative to the field. Before launching into a discussion of the implications this collection holds for upper secondary educators, I will first describe my own background and context so that readers can better understand my perspectives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Carlone, H., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237.
Francis, B., Archer, L., Moote, J., DeWitt, J., MacLeod, E., & Yeomans, L. (2016). The construction of physics as a quintessentially masculine subject: Young people’s perceptions of gender issues in access to physics. Sex Roles, 76, 1–19.
Hazari, Z., & Cass, C. (2018). Towards meaningful physics recognition: What does this recognition actually look like? The Physics Teacher, 56(7), 442–446. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5055325.
Hazari, Z., Brewe, E., Goertzen, R. M., & Hodapp, T. (2017). The importance of high school physics teachers for female students’ physics identity and persistence. The Physics Teacher, 55(2), 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4974122.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<296::AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R.
Rifkin, M. (2016, January 29). Addressing underrepresentation: Physics teaching for all. The Physics Teacher, 54(2), 72–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4940167.
Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gosling, C. (2020). Conclusions Part II: Implications of Identity Research for Upper Secondary Educators. In: Gonsalves, A.J., Danielsson, A.T. (eds) Physics Education and Gender. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41933-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41933-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41932-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41933-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)