Advertisement

A Geospatial Approach to Conserving Cultural Heritage Tourism at Kumbh Mela Events in India

Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Kumbh Mela (the festival of the sacred Pitcher) is the largest peaceful congregation of pilgrims, held in India. During this festival, participants bathe in a sacred river (UNESCO 2017). This study explores how Geographic Information Systems (GIS) can be used to focus on sites of urban regeneration for conserving cultural heritage tourism related to Kumbh Mela. This chapter focuses on the city of Ujjain (in the state of Madhya Pradesh), one of the four Indian cities that host the festival. Ujjain is considered one of the world’s oldest religious cities, with over 5000 years of history. During the last Kumbh Mela in 2016, Ujjain City registered 80 million tourist visits. This paper discusses two approaches through which Ujjain City can enhance the Kumbh experience of pilgrims while they visit and stay in the city. The first approach talks about enhancing the universal accessibility of bathing in ghat areas using GIS. Ghat areas, situated along the sacred Kshipra River, are the most important as these places experience the maximum footfall during the Kumbh Mela event. The second approach discusses how geospatial approaches can be utilized to provide safety to pilgrims, which must be considered in future development planning, as the event is prone to stampedes given the number of visitors. Approaches thus proposed in this study may be adopted by other host cities of Kumbh Mela which will ultimately help conserve heritage aspects of the event.

Keywords

Kumbh Mela GIS Universal accessibility Placemaking 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research has been funded by ‘Universal Design Innovation for Heritage’ project under Design Innovation Centre (DIC) of School of Planning and Architecture, Bhopal, India. DIC is funded by the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India. Authors like to thank the DIC team members for collecting data at Kumbh Mela.

References

  1. Access-improving the accessibility of historic buildings and places (2011) National Disability Authority. Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrose I, Balmas S, Barragán I, Medina H, Orejas M (2013) Accessible route in historical cities. Maria European Foundation Centre, Brussels, Belgium, pp 1–40Google Scholar
  3. Apollonio FI, Rizzo F, Bertacchi S, Dall’Osso G, Corbelli A, Grana C (2017) SACHER: smart architecture for cultural heritage in Emilia Romagna. In Italian research conference on digital libraries. Springer, Cham, pp 142–156Google Scholar
  4. Bonazzoli G (1977) Prayaga and its Kumbha Mela. Parana 19(1):81–160Google Scholar
  5. Brovelli MA, Hogan P, Minghini M, Zamboni G (2013) The power of Virtual Globes for valorising cultural heritage and enabling sustainable tourism: NASA World Wind applications. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 4:W2Google Scholar
  6. Code of Practice-on Accessibility of Public Services and Information (2006) Public bodies—national disability authority. Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  7. Problems And Prospects Of Accessible Tourism In India (2010) Commissioned by: Ministry of Tourism (Govt. of India), Indian Institute of Tourism and Travel Management (An Organisation of Ministry of Tourism, Govt. of India)Google Scholar
  8. Dubey SK (2001) Kumbh City Prayag. Centre for Cultural Resources and TrainingGoogle Scholar
  9. Hadjimitsis D, Agapiou A, Alexakis D, Sarris A (2013) Exploring natural and anthropogenic risk for cultural heritage in Cyprus using remote sensing and GIS. Int J Digit Earth 6(2):115–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jimura T (2019) World heritage sites tourism. Local Communities and Conservation Activities, CABI, Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Lochtefeld JG (2004) The construction of the Kumbha Mela. South Asian Popul Cult 2(2):103–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maclean K (2009) Seeing, being seen, and not being seen: pilgrimage, tourism, and layers of looking at the Kumbh Mela. CrossCurrents 59(3):319–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin EJ (1999) Improving access to heritage buildings—a practical guide to meeting the needs of people with disabilities. Australian Council of National Trusts, Canberra, Australia, pp 1–69Google Scholar
  14. McKercher B, Du Cros H (2002) Cultural tourism: the partnership between tourism and cultural heritage management. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Merhotra R, Vera F (eds) (2015) Kumbh Mela: mapping the ephemeral megacity. Hatje CantzGoogle Scholar
  16. Ministry of Urban Development (2016) Harrmonised guidelines and space standards for barrier free built environment for person with disability and elderly person. Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development reportGoogle Scholar
  17. Mullick A (2011) Uniting differences—universal design for exploring the world heritage sites in India. In: Khare R, Khare A. SPA Press, Bhopal, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  18. Stebbins RA (1996) Cultural tourism as serious leisure. Ann Tour Res 23(4):948–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stefano ML, Davis P, Corsane G (eds) (2014) Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage, vol 8. Boydell & Brewer Ltd., Woodbridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Timothy DJ, Nyaupane GP (eds) (2009) Cultural heritage and tourism in the developing world: a regional perspective. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Ujjain Smart City Proposal (2016) Ministry of Urban Development, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  22. UNESCO (2017) Kumbh Mela. https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/kumbh-mela-01258. Accessed 19 Sept 2019
  23. Wise N (2016) Outlining triple bottom line contexts in urban tourism regeneration. Cities 53:30–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wise N, Mulec I (2015) Aesthetic awareness and spectacle: communicated images of Novi Sad (Serbia), the exit festival, and the petrovaradin fortress. Tour Rev Int 19(4):193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Planning, School of Planning and ArchitectureBhopalIndia
  2. 2.Department of Architecture, School of Planning and ArchitectureBhopalIndia

Personalised recommendations