Abstract
Active leisure is strongly linked to happiness and well-being. Yet, actual leisure practices are stratified according to social class and status, and there is no consensus about what kind of leisure contributes to happiness. The aim of this empirical chapter is to understand whether some types of leisure are more associated with happiness than others—and why. It uses interview data (n = 49) on leisure and cultural consumption with Finnish people whose background profiles statistically predict low cultural participation (such as unemployment and/or low education). Qualitative content analysis is used to scrutinize expressions relating discussed leisure practices to happiness. Finland, one of the most egalitarian countries in the world with high rates of self-rated happiness according to recent reports, makes an interesting context for the study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ateca-Amestoy, V., Gerstenblüth, M., Mussio, I., & Rossi, M. (2016). How do cultural activities influence happiness? Investigating the relationship between self-reported well-being and leisure. Estudios Económicos, 31(2), 217–234.
Bauman, Z. (2008). The art of life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Belfiore, E. (2002). Art as a means of alleviating social exclusion: Does it really work? A critique of instrumental cultural policies and social impact studies in the UK. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8(1), 91–106.
Belfiore, E. (2016). The arts and healing: The power of an idea. In S. Clift & M. Camic Paul (Eds.), Oxford textbook of creative arts, health, and wellbeing (pp. 11–17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2007). Rethinking the social impacts of the arts. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(2), 135–151.
Bennett, T., Savage, M., Silva, E., Warde, A., Gayo-Cal, M., & Wright, D. (2009). Culture, class, distinction. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Darbel, A. (1991). The love of art. European art museums and their public. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1979). The inheritors: French students and their relation to culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bygren, L. O., Konlaan, B. B., & Johansson, S. E. (1996). Attendance at cultural events, reading books or periodicals, and making music or singing in a choir as determinants for survival: Swedish interview survey of living conditions. BMJ, 313, 1577–1580.
Cieslik, M. (2015). “Not Smiling but Frowning”: Sociology and the “Problem of Happiness”. Sociology, 49(3), 422–437.
Clift, S. (2012). Creative arts as a public health resource: Moving from practice-based research to evidence-based practice. Perspectives in Public Health, 132(3), 120–127.
Elliott, J., Miles, A., Parsons, S., & Savage, M. (2010). The design and content of the ‘Social participation’ study: A qualitative sub-study conducted as part of the age 50 (2008) sweep of the National Child Development Study. London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flemmen, M., Jarness, V., & Rosenlund, L. (2018). Social space and cultural class divisions: The forms of capital and contemporary lifestyle differentiation. The British Journal of Sociology, 69(1), 124–153.
Heikkilä, R. (2015). Suomalainen maku ja kulttuurin kuluttamisen valikoituneisuus [Finnish taste and the exclusiveness of cultural consumption]. In A. Lindholm (Ed.), Ei-kävijästä osalliseksi. Osallistuminen, osallistaminen ja osallisuus kulttuurialalla [From non-participant to participant. Participation, involvement and partaking in the cultural field] (pp. 33–52). Helsinki: Humak.
Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2018). World Happiness Report 2018. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
Hochschild, A. (2003). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. London: University of California Press.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
Hyyppä, M. (2010). Healthy ties. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hyyppä, M., Mäki, J., Impivaara, O., & Aromaa, A. (2006). Leisure participation predicts survival: A population-based study in Finland. Health Promotion International, 21, 5–12.
Konlaan, B. B., Bygren, L. O., & Johansson, S. E. (2000). Visiting the cinema, concerts, museums or art exhibitions as determinant of survival: A Swedish fourteen-year cohort follow-up. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 28, 174–178.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews. Learning the craft of qualitative research interviews. London: Sage.
Lahire, B. (2004). La culture des individus. Dissonances culturelles et distinction de soi. Paris: La Découverte.
Lamont, M. (1992). Money, morals and manners: The culture of the French and American upper-middle classes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lamont, M., & Swidler, A. (2014). Methodological pluralism and the possibilities and limits of interviewing. Qualitative Sociology, 37(2), 153–171.
Miles, A., & Sullivan, A. (2012). Understanding participation in culture and sport: Mixing methods, reordering knowledges. Cultural Trends, 21(4), 311–324.
Miller, D. (Ed.). (2001). Home possessions: Material culture behind closed doors. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Oishi, S., Graham, J., Kesebir, S., & Galinha, I. C. (2013). Concepts of happiness across time and cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(5), 559–577.
Peterson, R. A., & Kern, R. M. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61, 900–907.
Purhonen, S., Gronow, J., Heikkilä, R., Kahma, N., Rahkonen, K., & Toikka, A. (2014). Suomalainen maku. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Silverman, D. (2014). Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage.
Stebbins, R. A. (2009). Personal decisions in the public square: Beyond problem solving into a positive sociology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Stebbins, R. A. (2020). Positive sociology. An overview. In S. Kono, A. Beniwal, P. Baweja, & K. Spracklen (Eds.), Positive sociology of leisure: Contemporary perspectives on sociology of leisure. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wheatley, D., & Bickerton, C. (2017). Subjective well-being and engagement in arts, culture and sport. Journal of Cultural Economics, 41(1), 23–45.
Wilkinson, A. V., Waters, A. J., Bygren, L. O., & Tarlov, A. R. (2007). Are variations in rates of attending cultural activities associated with population health in the United States. BMC Public Health, 7, 226.
Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus group methodology: A review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(1), 181–203.
Willekens, M., & Lievens, J. (2016). Who participates and how much? Explaining non-attendance and the frequency of attending arts and heritage activities. Poetics, 56, 50–63.
Yaish, M., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2012). Disentangling “Cultural Capital”: The consequences of cultural and economic resources for taste and participation. European Sociological Review, 28(2), 169–185.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heikkilä, R. (2020). Anything Goes for Being Happy? A Qualitative Analysis of Discourses on Leisure in Finland. In: Kono, S., Beniwal, A., Baweja, P., Spracklen, K. (eds) Positive Sociology of Leisure. Leisure Studies in a Global Era. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41812-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41812-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41811-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41812-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)